I am nor sure where I should report this since this list is for
general DocBook questions and not mailing lists issues but I would
like to mention the fact that the procedure to subscribe to the list as
described at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/mailinglist/
.. did not work for me.
As
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:46:55PM EST, cga2000 wrote:
I am nor sure where I should report this since this list is for
general DocBook questions and not mailing lists issues but I would
like to mention the fact that the procedure to subscribe to the list as
described at:
Yeah. This could have been a solution :) I just have one problem with
that: The extensions do not exist on Debian systems. Unfortunately I
cannot provide them with the docbook-xsl package.
I don't understand. Are you saying the DocBook XSL package on Debian
excludes the extensions directory
Bob Stayton a écrit :
This seems to be a bug in FOP 0.93 regarding fo:footnotes inside a
fo:list-block. If you set the stylesheet parameter
glossary.as.blocks=1 then the footnote comes out ok. But it isn't as
nice looking.
I think you could report this as a bug to the FOP developers.
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 00:09 -0800 schrieb Bob Stayton:
Yeah. This could have been a solution :) I just have one problem with
that: The extensions do not exist on Debian systems. Unfortunately I
cannot provide them with the docbook-xsl package.
I don't understand. Are you saying
Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 18:38 +0900 schrieb Michael(tm) Smith:
Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2007-02-27 08:59 +0100:
Yeah. This could have been a solution :) I just have one problem with
that: The extensions do not exist on Debian systems. Unfortunately I
cannot provide them with
