On 22 Jun 2001, at 17:54, Peter Ring wrote:
While Dublin Core might often be appropriate for *delivery* of common
metadata, it is not really intended for basic markup in your repository.
Gee, I don't know. Is it possible to assure the right intention for
everything? Some persons use a
-
From: Jeff Iezzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Markup for personal names
On 22 Jun 2001, at 17:54, Peter Ring wrote:
While Dublin Core might often be appropriate for *delivery* of common
metadata, it is not really
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:47:53PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Michael Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I've had a long standing action item to write a new proposal for
| names and addresses. So I've been thinking about personal
|
/ Horacio [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| [messing up a bit]
|
| On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Wroth, M. LTC MATH wrote:
|
|
|personalnamegivennameMark/givennamesecondnameB./secondnamesurnameWroth/surnamelinealJr/lineal/personalname
|
| I much prefer forename to givenname, and the
On 21 Jun 2001, at 16:47, Norman Walsh wrote:
| Rather than reinvent the wheel from scratch, I wonder if there are any
| sources we could borrow from. Does anyone know of a good name markup |
schema? | | I'll do some looking at other sources and follow up to the
list with | any examples I
At 01:09 PM 21/06/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
Rather than reinvent the wheel from scratch, I wonder if there are any
sources we could borrow from. Does anyone know of a good name markup
schema?
Or, alternatively, be consistent with other elements, e.g., para,
simplepara, formalpara?
/ Ed Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| At 01:09 PM 21/06/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
| Rather than reinvent the wheel from scratch, I wonder if there are any
| sources we could borrow from. Does anyone know of a good name markup
| schema?
|
| Or, alternatively, be consistent with
At 03:42 PM 21/06/2001 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
snip
| Or, alternatively, be consistent with other elements, e.g., para,
| simplepara, formalpara?
I'm not sure I follow. Are you suggesting different elements for personal
names with something akin to the bibliomixed vs. biblientry content
/ Michael Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I've had a long standing action item to write a new proposal for
| names and addresses. So I've been thinking about personal
| names. Right now we have author, editor, etc. but there's clearly a
|
/ Ed Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Sorry, Norm. It came off the top of my head and was more a response to
| your example: nameNorm Walsh/name
| versus the current firstname, othername, surname, etc. set. At the
| risk of added complexity, perhaps a more well considered variant like
I notice your comment -- correct in my experience -- that librarians and
archivists do not attempt to decompose the name and/because it is difficult
to do so. This is precisely why I think a usable markup model for this
information is desirable -- the author may be able to supply this
[messing up a bit]
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Wroth, M. LTC MATH wrote:
personalnamegivennameMark/givennamesecondnameB./secondnamesurnameWroth/surnamelinealJr/lineal/personalname
I much prefer forename to givenname, and the simpler name
to personalname.
and
personalnameMark B. Wroth
12 matches
Mail list logo
