(apologies for such trivial questions -- i'm only just getting back
to docbook after quite some time away.)
if i wanted to display the contents (or an excerpt thereof) of a
simple text file such as, say, a config file, what is the semantically
proper element? i don't want to use
(not strictly a docbook question but i'm interested in the opinion
of the gurus here.)
i'm perusing the semantic markup of someone who has created their
own XML language which, in all, looks fairly similar to docbook, but
this person has explicitly defined two elements -- file-name and
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Jirka Kosek wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
perhaps a silly question, but at the moment (as i read it), the
definition of docbook is generally presented as the official DTD.
however, there is also a schema for docbook and, given that schemas
can represent things non
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http
replacing fop.
xep is not open source, is it? last i looked, it was still
commercial with trial versions. ideally, i'd like to keep my entire
toolchain OSS.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
to do is just set up a minimal f12 toolchain.
thoughts and a couple questions on that shortly.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training
. for no good reason, i want to clarify these steps so i can write
a one-page wiki entry on how to get started playing with docbook5 on
fedora linux.
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
of a 5.0 directory under that one:
http://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/docbook/trunk/testdocs/tests/5.0/
i'm assuming that's where a collection of equivalent 5.0 docs are
slowly being collected?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day
. is there a canonical test suite for
this? thanks.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page
some of the content here could stand to be updated:
http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookPackages
where's the right forum to make some suggestions?
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo
to follow up bob stayton's recent posting on adding
xsl:output indent=yes to get indented, hierarchical output:
1) works great with xalan. xsltproc, on the other hand, doesn't
seem to recognize this attribute although, in all fairness,
no XSLT processor is *required* to do so
2) xalan
a couple of quick questions regarding docbook - FO and beyond.
first, i'm experimenting with FOP for the eventual FO - PDF
conversion, so i'm using xsltproc to generate the intermediate
FO for the time being. is there an option with xsltproc to
generate tidy FO? or some kind of tidy utility
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Steinar Bang wrote:
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the problem is that something like the escape key can be used in
two different ways:
1) it can be a modifier, if you want to call it that, in that it
can be pressed just before pressing another key
i didn't mean to make a big issue out of this; i'm satisfied
with the current proposal, but let me just try to explain what
i was talking about -- it might make sense, it might not.
currently, a key cap is written as keycapx/keycap. this
seems to suggest that a keycap is, by default, of
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, David Cramer wrote:
Nested procedures, procedures inside of tables, etc. would be messy--not
sure how you'd number them. substeps allows you to nest procedures
without that problem. I think no procedures in paras is a good thing.
i don't follow this logic. in a way, a
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
Here's my 2 cents:
I see no reason that a procedure should be a child of a paragraph. The
paragraph immediately preceding a procedure would reference that
procedure. Why would one need to put a procdure inside a paragraph?
for exactly the same reason
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tim Waugh wrote:
I think you're confusing para with simpara. A para is not a
single textual paragraph, but a grouping of elements that constitute
an idea. It's typically used in the same way that simpara is, but
it's very often used like this:
paraIt's very often
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
So what are you proposing? That an inline procedure element be a child
of the paragraph element?
only that a para be allowed to have a procedure as a child,
that's all. i think this has gotten blown way out of proportion
here.
rday
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Steven Cogorno wrote:
Robert P. J. Day said:
consider a possible para:
paraIf you want to start writing in DocBook, here are the
steps you'll need to do:
procedure
/procedure
/para
this makes perfect sense, and it's clear
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Carlos Araya wrote:
Robert:
Semantically iot makes perfect sense but it's when converting the docbook to
other formats that a problem is caused. How owuld translate the:
procedure
step.../step
/procedure
Into HTML or PDF?
I tend to agree with a previous
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
As I see it now you have a point in seeing that the procedure element be
included as a child of the paragraph element. It does make sense,
especially in context of the other child elements. Why not put in an RFE
at:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
If I may inquire, what ever happened to your RFE? I assume it wasn't
implemented, any reason why?
well, i submitted it this morning. i guess norm is slacking
again. :-)
rday
?
and if anyone wants to play along, i can email them
my sample DB file showing the various markup elements
and they can see what they get out of it.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day, RHCE
Eno River Technologies, Inc.
Unix, Linux and Open Source training
since this involves parsing potentially docbook files, i
figured i'd throw it out here.
i'm trying to clarify how one properly installs the xerces-j
parser for use by, for instance, saxon, and i've read conflicting
explanations.
the xerces-j distribution comes with three jar files:
i just noticed that the procedure element cannot be a child
of a para, as can other lists. any reason for this? it seems
like this would be useful if a procedure should be considered
part of its enclosing paragraph. just curious.
rday
i downloaded the latest FOP from xml.apache.org, and installed
what i thought was everything i needed around it (Jimi, the newer
xalan in the endorsed/ directory and so on), but when i run FOP
to convert a .fo file to .pdf, i get:
[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
is there anything to upgrading to a newer set of docbook
XSL stylesheets besides just downloading the tarball and
installing it in the right place? it seems fairly obvious,
but one never knows.
i have a RH 8.0 system with the salient directories
/usr/share/sgml/docbook/
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:48:11AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
and add it to the xmlto command with -m, it has no effect.
is this because it's not an xsl:param, but an xsl:attribute-set?
The xmlto program doesn't interpret the fragments at all
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
On Sun, 02 Mar 2003 14:51:41 -0500 (EST)
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i spent the last hour trying to figure out why i was losing
my PIs and comments in transforming my original XML source file
to another XML format.
my
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
With this style xslt-processor must not copy comments and PI.
This style not overriding built-in templates, so saxon is
incorrect.
ah, so as i read this, the conflict resolution is that,
even if i have a template that matches node(), that will
be
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jirka Kosek wrote:
Vitaly Ostanin wrote:
node() is not a comment, not PI, not attribute - it just node
like
node/
With respect, you are wrong. Exact behaviour of node() is defined in
XPath recommendation and you can read in section 2.3:
A node test node() is
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jirka Kosek wrote:
But this discussion should be probably moved to some xsl specific or
processor specific list. It drifted far away from DocBook processing.
i agree. i've already posted on the mulberrytech list, so i'll see
what i get back there.
rday
i spent the last hour trying to figure out why i was losing
my PIs and comments in transforming my original XML source file
to another XML format.
my stripped-down stylesheet to isolate the problem was
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
xsl:stylesheet
XSLT, Doug Tidwell, p. 51
* The node() node test, which selects all nodes in the current
context, regardless of type. This includes elements, text, comments
processing instuctions, attributes, and namespace nodes.
XSLT Programmer's Reference, 2nd ed., Michael Kay, p. 432
Since root
i'm about to sit down with kay's 1000-page XSLT book and
a keg of coffee. is there an XSLT-specific mailing list
somewhere that i can antagonize on occasion?
rday
for the first time, i'm incorporating a qandaset into a document,
and when generating the chunked HTML, what i'm getting doesn't match
what is in the latest TDG online documentation.
what i get is, first, the list of questions (which are links),
followed by the question and answer pairs.
is the figure element still endorsed despite the fact that
there is a mediaobject element that can contain an
imageobject?
i notice that, in docbook 5.0, mediaobject will replace
graphic. will figure also be deprecated in deference to
mediaobject as well?
rday
p.s. and did anything ever
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:31:52AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
almost certainly a trivial question, but i've looked through
the entire FO Parameter Reference and i don't see how i can
force a page break before particular section headers when
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:31:52AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
almost certainly a trivial question, but i've looked through
the entire FO Parameter Reference and i don't see how i can
force a page break before particular section headers when
pulled it out of dead.letter but forgot to clean it up.
sorry.
rday
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Martin Stemplinger wrote:
On So Feb 23 2003 at 18:29, Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as a final efficiency for typing in my XML, i'd like
to add an emacs function to auto-terminate tags, as one
can do in emacs+psgml. (i don't know enough about psgml
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jeff Beal wrote:
I have the following template in my customization layer that forces a page
break and places the section on an odd-numbered page, based on the existence
of a role attribute:
xsl:template match=[EMAIL PROTECTED]'rightpagestart']
fo:block
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Jeff Beal wrote:
XSL customization can be quite complicated in many ways. Basically, you
need to be the master of the source language (DocBook), the target language
(XSL-FO or HTML+CSS), the transformation language (XSLT), and the stylesheet
base (The XSLT stylesheets
as a final efficiency for typing in my XML, i'd like
to add an emacs function to auto-terminate tags, as one
can do in emacs+psgml. (i don't know enough about psgml
to see how it does it, but i don't need all of psgml --
just this one feature.)
all i want to be able to do is, with a control
i'm following the advice of one of the posters here and designing
an XSL stylesheet that will allow me to write in what i'm calling
pidgin docbook, with shortcuts for all of the elements i use,
like p for para, em for emphasis, and so on.
what i'm not clear on is how to write a template for
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:41:32AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm following the advice of one of the posters here and designing
an XSL stylesheet that will allow me to write in what i'm calling
pidgin docbook, with shortcuts for all
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Jeff Beal wrote:
I would include the xsl:apply-templates select=@*|node()/ in all of your
templates. If you just use xsl:apply-templates/, you will discard all
text, comments, processing-instructions, and attributes in that element.
ah, gotcha. so, other than that, it
just in case anyone was interested, i threw together a script
that accepts pairs of element names and generates the appropriate
.xsl file that i use to tranform pidgin docbook to the real thing.
it *appears* to work, and you can see how easy it is to add
more transformations.
rday
i'm still working my way thru the literature on XSLT, and i'm
having a couple of transformation issues with my current .xsl file.
to be brief, here's the opening part of the pidgin.xsl file:
?xml version=1.0 ?
xsl:stylesheet
xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform;
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, David Cramer wrote:
Using Saxon and your stylesheet, I get ?xml version=1.0
encoding=utf-8? and comments are copied through.
ok, so apparently, xsltproc is not behaving nicely. thanks.
rday
while i know there are numerous XML editors to make one's
life easier, one of my issues is that, in the end, the
docbook that is produced is virtually impossible to scan
(although i'm sure numerous people will tell me that that's
not the point, you're not *supposed* to be able to scan it,
just
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Markus Spath wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i like to write my documents and manuals in condensed
form, and it would be nice to quickly to go from that to
final docbook.
Since you stay with the xml-syntax anyway I'd say XSLT would be a convenient
way; all
since i'm just about to start transforming some of my
docbook files into PDF, i was looking at the possible
toolchains and have a couple questions:
first, since my docs are not that complicated, i was
going to try saxon 7.3.1, just for the fun of it, but
this leads to two issues:
1) is
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Jirka Kosek wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
first, since my docs are not that complicated, i was
going to try saxon 7.3.1, just for the fun of it, but
this leads to two issues:
Saxon 7.x is _experimental_ implementation of XSLT 2.0. It is not
recommended
what XSL param would i use to generate a single-level
TOC in every section, regardless of that section's level?
that is, at the chapter level, i want to open with a TOC that
contains only the section level 1 entries.
if i go to a level 1 section, it should start with a TOC
listing its
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i have a docbook file that, for the first time, is using
three levels of sectioning, but even when i set the chunking
level to 3, it refuses to go beyond two.
here's my
i have a docbook file that, for the first time, is using
three levels of sectioning, but even when i set the chunking
level to 3, it refuses to go beyond two.
here's my chunk.xsl file:
?xml version='1.0'?
xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform;
a while back, i got some pointers from people on this list
for websites that used the website DTD -- some very nice
examples there.
any pointers to tutorials on starting to use the website DTD?
mailing list? examples? any pointers gratefully accepted.
rday
Robert P. J. Day, RHCE
Eno
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
i can send my ant build.xml file and the corresponding
website stylesheets to the list if you are interested ...
btw - shouldn't this mail go to docbook-apps instead
of docbook ;-)
probably. or it would be even better if it went to
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but what if i wanted to similarly represent Ctrl Alt Fn, where
the n part was replaceable? is there any way to add parameters
to regular entity definitions?
Not really. An entity can use another
from what i've read, it appears that the officially sanctioned to
represent something like the simultaneous key combination
Ctrl Alt Del would be
keycombo action=simul
keycapCtrl/keycap
keycapAlt/keycap
keycapDel/keycap
/keycombo
and if i was planning on needing it frequently,
for the longest time, i've designed manuals using emacs outline
mode, given the invaluable ability to expand and collapse any part
of the document.
given that i'm just about to start learning the psgml package
to use with emacs, can i still set it up to use outline mode
while retaining psgml
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
How does this sound:
1. Add 'verbatim'.
!ELEMENT verbatim (...)
!ATTLIST verbatim
class(normal|monospaced) monospaced
contents CDATA #IMPLIED
Contents is where you can say it's a configfile or a cprogram or
whatever
given that i've concentrated exclusively on docbook and
XSL stylesheets, am i correct in assuming that DSSSL stylesheets
are an alternative to XSL? (which, AFAICT, i have no interest
in since i'm restricting myself to XSL).
which leads to a related question -- as i read it, the jade
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Wlodzimierz Skiba wrote:
Is chapters supposed to be counted per part ? I mean is this a bug or expected
behaviour that chapters are rendered with contignous numbering along whole
book without reset at begining of each part. I use following syntax:
book
i have a section of a much larger docbook document, with the following
screen element and co callout marks:
screen
filename/etc/passwd/filename co id=/etc/passwd/
filename/etc/shadow/filename co id=/etc/shadow/
filename/etc/group/filename
again, nitpicky, but in the online TDG 2.0.7, in the explanation
of xref, we read:
... If the Endterm attribute is specified, the content of the
element pointed by by Endterm must be used as the text of the
cross-reference ... If the object pointed to has a specified
XRefLabel, that
appropriate for some symbols, so is there
a compelling example of a value that would be symbol that
would clearly *not* be a constant?
and, given their similarity, it would probably be useful
that each of them refer to the other with See Also.
rday
Robert P. J. Day, RHCE, RHCI
Eno River
the example for a shortcut seems inappropriate, since it
allegedly demonstrates a keycombo for an emacs key sequence,
which is presented as C-x-C-c, but the standard representation
for an emacs key sequence is (AFAICT) C-x C-c instead.
comments?
rday
according to TDG 2.0.7, the table attribute tocentry
defines whether the table will appear in the generated
List of Tables. is there a reason that attribute is not
called lotentry instead?
rday
for something like itemizedlist, what does it mean for the spacing
attribute to have no listed default? i'm sure someone explained this to
me once before, i've just lost it (the answer, not my mind).
rday
i'm not clear on the rationale for the simpara element.
since it seems to be a restricted version of para, does it
have any benefits? i guess, other than that it can be
transformed differently based on a stylesheet.
rday
Robert P. J. Day, RHCE, RHCI
Eno River Technologies, Chapel Hill NC
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Restie Perona wrote:
hi guys,
can anybody help me about this?
My text shows like this: Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
with error:
publisher
address
cityPhiladelphia:/city
/address
publishernameWB Saunders,/publishername
/publisher
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:30:07PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Restie Perona wrote:
hi guys,
can anybody help me about this?
My text shows like this: Philadelphia: WB Saunders,
with error:
publisher
currently, in a screen element, anything i put in a
lineannotation element is displayed in regular, courier font.
what's the easiest way to have that italic, times roman
instead?
is there a specific XSL stylesheet directive for doing this,
or should i go through the CSS decoration? and am
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Kraa de Simon wrote:
Ehm, not really... (-;
I do not want to define all entities in main.xml (where the DOCTYPE is, as
you indicated), but divide them over the different XML files where the
entities are actually used.
The main reason: so I can isolate the
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:05:26AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
currently, in a screen element, anything i put in a
lineannotation element is displayed in regular, courier font.
what's the easiest way to have that italic, times roman
instead
i'm writing some fairly simple docbook in red hat 8.0, which
has the docbook 4.2 dtd, which allegedly supports the errortext
element.
i've verified that that DTD directory is there under
/usr/share/sgml/docbook, that xmlcatalog properly resolves
the public identifier to that location, i've
i'm sure numerous folks will tell me that this is a silly
thing to do, but is there a parameter somewhere that will
tell xsltproc to generate tidy html from docbook, so that
it's at least remotely humanly readable, rather than one
long line? just curious. having it a bit more readable
makes
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Jirka Kosek wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i'm sure numerous folks will tell me that this is a silly
thing to do, but is there a parameter somewhere that will
tell xsltproc to generate tidy html from docbook, so that
it's at least remotely humanly readable
what's the trick to getting the neat dark circles with internal
numbers in a callout list like norm walsh has in his online docbook
TDG? all i get are boring numbers. i'm sure there's an XSL trick
somewhere, yes?
rday
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
Are you using a customization? The 'callout.graphics'
parameter is set to 1 by default in the XSL stylesheets.
found the problem -- the callout graphics png files 1.png and
so on were not at the default directory location, so a quick
fix to
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:23:09PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Bob Stayton wrote:
Are you using a customization? The 'callout.graphics'
parameter is set to 1 by default in the XSL stylesheets.
found the problem
i want to list all of the files involved in the linux login process:
/etc/passwd
/etc/shadow
/etc/group
/etc/profile
... etc etc ...
and would like to assign something like callouts to each file so i can
expand on each one underneath the list. but, as i read it, cos can't
be
i can't seem to get java to find the sax.Counter class to play
with some of the xerces stuff.
first, under red hat 8.0, i've installed sun's jdk 1.4.1,
and that seems to work fine, with the full path being
/usr/java/j2sdk-1.4.1.
according to the docs, i can add some extensions as long
as
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Mark Johnson wrote:
On Saturday, November 2, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
if one has queries about XML catalogs, where's the best
place to ask?
Since I suspect you're interested in the RedHat implementation, Daniel
Veillard is their defacto resident xml catalog policy
i have a couple clients who are interested in a course in
xml/docbook and associated processing. i could write it myself
at this point, but it would take some time.
does anyone have recent, up-to-date and battle-tested courseware?
feel free to drop me a note and we can talk. or point me
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Norman Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ Joachim Ziegler [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Exercises occur much more frequently as a building block than descriptions of
| destructors., I think. That's why I was wondering why there is no
www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook/specs/cs-docbook-docbook-4.2.xml
seems to be broken. or is it just me?
rday
i'm still grappling with how to categorize a set of exercises
that would be found at the end of a section.
i'd like the set to have a title, Exercises, but i don't want
it to be a section since that doesn't seem appropriate, and i
don't want the exercises to show up in the TOC.
(i emailed norm walsh about this already, but assuming that
he's generally a busy guy, i thought i'd ask about something
here.)
for the purpose of being able to peruse the latest (2.0.7)
version of docbook: TDG, i wanted to print it off, perhaps
using mpage to do it 2 up to save paper.
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 03:55:41PM -0700, Norman Walsh wrote:
The see-also lists at the bottom of each reference page are
generated from this list:
Is this list in tdg cvs, so that we could work and submit patches on
latest version ?
I have
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Dave Pawson wrote:
!DOCTYPE section PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN
/sgml/oasis/docbook412/docbookx.dtd
!ENTITY tdgHome /documentation/tdg/en/html/
snip
what about for 4.2 rather than 4.1.2? or is that a silly question?
rday
what's the appropriate inline markup to use for a term that is just
being introduced for the first time? for example, before you start
the procedure, you must first go out a buy a widget. a widget is insert
explanation here...^^
normally, such terms are shown
www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml
while that page says that DocBook XML V4.2 is the current version
of DocBook, the most recent link is to DocBook XML V4.2CR3. perhaps
the addition of a link with the more obvious name of simply V4.2?
rday
is there a hierarchical reference list for the current
docbook elements somewhere? you know, grouped by association
or category or something like that.
at the moment, google isn't turning up anything like that.
thanks.
rday
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Dave Pawson wrote:
At 07:11 27/07/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a hierarchical reference list for the current
docbook elements somewhere? you know, grouped by association
or category or something like that.
I'd suggest the index in docbook
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Dave Pawson wrote:
At 08:58 27/07/2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
actually, i'm in the process of creating a hierarchical list
(in emacs outline mode) of all of the elements listed in TDG
(updated when i get the chance).
when i'm done, i can post it if anyone's
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Tsuguya Sasaki wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a hierarchical reference list for the current
docbook elements somewhere? you know, grouped
by association or category or something like that.
Check the section Logical Divisions: The Categories of
Elements
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
