Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-15 Thread Christopher R. Maden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 08:07 14-11-2001, Norman Walsh wrote: One outstanding problem is the link attribute names. Unfortunately, XLink doesn't allow the XLink HREF attribute to be renamed, so we'll have to battle the linkend vs xlink:href problem. I think we have two

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Adam Turoff
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote: So my proposal is that we allow most (all?) inline elements to optionally function as simple links. We may also want to allow selected other elements (like funcprototype) to function as simple links as well. Which inline elements

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Jirka Kosek
Adam Turoff wrote: There's a reasonably good case for making block elements such as section and chapter take xlinks as well; it makes it easier to compose larger works from smaller works without resorting to defining entities in the local subset, especially when using xlink:show=embed.

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: Norman Walsh wrote: Given a PE like this: !ENTITY % xlink-optional-simple-link xlink:type (simple)#IMPLIED I think that there should be #FIXED simple, so one is not forced to add xlink:type=simple to

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Jirka Kosek
Daniel Veillard wrote: On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: Norman Walsh wrote: Given a PE like this: !ENTITY % xlink-optional-simple-link xlink:type (simple)#IMPLIED I think that there should be #FIXED simple, so one is not forced

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Yann Dirson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:47:44PM +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: 1. Switch. Remove linkend and break everything all at once. This is not good approach, IMHO. Seconded. 2. Allow both in V5 and remove linkend in V6. Stipulating that when both are present linkend wins (or xlink:href wins,

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Dave Pawson
At 18:13 14/11/2001 +0100, Jirka Kosek wrote: OK. So lets have extended links in DocBook. With ~400 elements, DocBook always provided features that most users didn't use, but they were there for few people who needed them. Lot of truth in that Norm! The XML ahead is a docbook instance?

Re: DOCBOOK: Linking in DocBook V5.0

2001-11-14 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
At 11:56 AM -0500 11/14/01, Daniel Veillard wrote: Is there anybody who need to use extended links? If there is no stress Yes, me. I want to be able to use external link bases containing generic indexes for a collections of documents at least. Yes, but the point of external linkbases is