Hi Jirka,
I got some clarification from the vendor, and you are correct that not all
named character entities will be considered incorrect.
In particular, it looks like the following five entities remain ok: lt;, gt;,
amp;, quote; and apos;
Thanks for the reply; it pushed me into checking
I got the information from a conversion house, but I'm following up with them,
so I'll refrain from naming them until they get a chance to respond.
Dick
---
XML Press
XML for Technical Communicators
http://xmlpress.net
hamil...@xmlpress.net
On Oct 22, 2014, at 13:41, Jirka Kosek
It looks as though the next version of epubcheck may reject epub3 files that
use named character entities (amp;, etc.).
Right now, the stylesheets will generate at least some of these, even if you
use the numeric equivalent (e.g., if you use #38; for ampersand in your
source, the output will
On 22.10.2014 18:48, Richard Hamilton wrote:
It looks as though the next version of epubcheck may reject epub3 files that
use named character entities (amp;, etc.).
Any source for this information?
It's hard to believe that amp; will be refused as it can't be written
directly (same with lt;
