Hello I am trying to scale an image to "50%" of a "5.25in" page margin.
Below is the code.
Video Logix
The problem is that the image is not scalling at all it's only rendering
to the full 5.25in defined in contentwidth. Am I doing something wrong?
I even use instead of and th
I think your right Colin that it's nothing to worry about -- it's just
an annoyance. Interestingly, I manually removed the span="inherit"
from the fo file (it surrounds the Index title) -- the warning from
FOP went away and the PDF file looked ok too.
tgm
On 4/25/07, Colin Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTEC
I've been trying to get inline images in a PDF file to appear
correctly but they always seem to big. I've been following the advice
in Bob's excellent book (also available at
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/ImageSizing.html) and using
So far, no luck; they appear to be scaled bigger
Yeah, the default value of span is "none" (
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/slice7.html#span).
So, by setting span="inherit" on a child object, you are effectively setting
its span attribute to "none" as well.
I think the FOP developers just designed FOP to output a warning whenever a
I have heard that fop is not so good at obeying the scaling commands.
I can't remember where, though.
On 4/26/07, T.G. Mutato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to get inline images in a PDF file to appear
correctly but they always seem to big. I've been following the advice
in Bob's ex
I'm currently working with a custom stylesheet I wrote from scratch (not
DocBook) to generate FO from an XML document, and I'm using FOP v0.93. I've
found that the image scaling does work. If I use the following FO:
then the image is scaled properly to the given width, and the proportions
rem
Hrm, maybe I was thinking of fop 0.2x
I did (re)find more info on DocBook's scaling attributes:
http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/imagedata.html
On 4/26/07, Colin Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently working with a custom stylesheet I wrote from scratch (not
DocBook) to generate F
Was this for an image that is 100 pixels wide Colin? Or was the
example meant to say ..."width=100%"...?
Thanks,
tgm
On 4/26/07, Colin Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently working with a custom stylesheet I wrote from scratch (not
DocBook) to generate FO from an XML document, and
No, I meant pixels, as I wrote. It works this way for an image of any size;
if my source image is 800px wide and 600px tall, then the FO
will render my image as 100px wide and 75px tall (preserving the
proportions).
Colin
On 4/26/07, T.G. Mutato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> content-width=
Hi,
Actually, that example is for a mediaobject, not an inlinemediaobject. The
width attribute is specifying the size of the viewport, and width=100% is
going to mean the width of the current block. Then scalefit="1" means to
scale it up to fit that viewport. That's why they are too big.
W
You should use width="5.25in" to set the viewport area reserved for the
graphic, and then scale="50" will make it half that size. The contentwidth
attribute specifies the size of the output image. In your example, the
contentwidth attribute is overriding the scale attribute. See the
second-t
The example
was just one of the many I tried Bob. Even something very simple like
didn't work for
the inline image. I also tried specifying the actual width and height
of the graphic but that didn't work either; it still looked to big.
On 4/26/07, Bob Stayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
12 matches
Mail list logo
