Jirka Kosek wrote:
There is no contradiction. Your document will be read by humans. In many
cases (I'm not saying in all, so might be your indexing needs are really
different) human can't start reading in the middle of paragraph after
he/she followed link from index. Instead you usually need
/ Keith Fahlgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:25 AM, spr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have a very basic customization - only to set the draft.mode to yes
| (see attached).
| ...
| xsl:param name=draft.mode select=yes/
Almost all of the boolean parameters in the
As I work on porting the XSLT 1.0 stylesheets to XSLT 2.0, I find
workarounds, mostly for FOP and PassiveTeX scattered throughout. Does
anyone know if these are still necessary?
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
/ Stefan Seefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| earlier this year I asked about the expected and 'correct' behavior
| for index generation in HTML and pdf, as I found (find) the current
| behavior surprising.
[...]
| I still find these two texts to contradict each other. I do find the
|
On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers:
F
Foo, _1_, _2_
is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as
page numbers. A 1 under Foo should be the same place as a 1 under
Bar which simply won't be
Norman Walsh wrote:
DocBook: The Definitive Guide is normative with respect to the
processing expectations. The HTML stylesheets simply don't satisfy
those expectations.
Issue 1. OK
If you can think of a way to present the index in HTML that more
closely matches the expectations, I'd be
On Wed, Mar 12 2008 14:16:19 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Tony Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| ...
| Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers:
|
| F
|
| Foo, _1_, _2_
|
| is misleading
Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Suggest putting the responsibility on the author?
| If they choose to use
| primaryFoo/primary then that is exactly what they'll get?
I don't follow. Foo is the index term, that's what appears in the index:
Index
Hi -
I have the impression that I used to be one of the most serious
PassiveTeX users out there, but I have now abandoned it in favor of
Fop (trunk alias fop1). For me, PassiveTeX is a thing of the past.
Are you (or is somebody else) going to port the slides stylesheets
also? This would be
/ Tony Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| ...
| Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers:
|
| F
|
| Foo, _1_, _2_
|
| is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as
| page numbers. A 1 under Foo
Norman Walsh wrote:
/ Tony Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| On Wed, Mar 12 2008 12:18:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| ...
| Likewise, using pseudo-page numbers:
|
| F
|
| Foo, _1_, _2_
|
| is misleading because readers have been conditioned to think of those as
| page
/ Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Suggest putting the responsibility on the author?
| If they choose to use
| primaryFoo/primary then that is exactly what they'll get?
I don't follow. Foo is the index term, that's what appears in the index:
Index
...
F
Fable, ...
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| Are you (or is somebody else) going to port the slides stylesheets
| also? This would be greatly appreciated over here :-).
Yes. Eventually. I've probably done the HTML ones, the FO ones will have
to wait until the FO stylesheets more-or-less work.
Hi Rolf,
can anybody tell me in which xsl file I can find the docbook
language settings (#8222;chapter#8220;, #8222;figure#8220;,
#8222;table#8220;
etc. in different langages)?
It's not in a XSL file. Each language has a separate file,
stored under the common directory. :)
Tom
On Wed, Mar 12 2008 14:01:48 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| FWIW, I think that scheme works okay in the CSS2 index at
| http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2/indexlist.html
Bleh. I think it looks ridiculous. But if the world disagrees with me,
I won't stand in its way. I probably will give
For more detailed information, see this doc:
http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/CustomGentext.html
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Schraitle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Hi Norm,
No fix is needed, as draft.mode is not a boolean parameter. It has three
possible text values (yes, no, maybe), and has since at least 2002. The
param is correctly documented in:
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/fo/draft.mode.html
Bob Stayton
Sagehill
FrameMaker's online help index uses this format:
cats [1]
dogs [1] [2]
where the [1] is the hot text that takes you to the point destination. All
entries have [1], and any duplicates get more numbers. It is pretty obvious
that those are not page numbers.
Just another suggestion.
Bob
Hi,
In DocBook 5's RelaxNG schema, the imagedata, equation, and informalequation
elements can contain elements in the MathML namespace. So the equation
example in the book is still accurate, you can just skip the DOCTYPE
declarations.
Once you mix namespaces, though, validation becomes more
19 matches
Mail list logo
