Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Saxon 9

2008-08-19 Thread Florent Georges 
Norman Walsh wrote:

  Hi Norman,

 Perhaps you forgot to say 'version=2.0' on your xsl:stylesheet
 element?

  If I am right, even with version=1.0, Saxon 9 should recognize
xsl:result-document.  But is it really Saxon 9?  I would test it for
real with something like:

xsl:template match=/
   info
  version info={ system-property('xsl:version') }/
  vendor info={ system-property('xsl:vendor') }/
  vendor-url info={ system-property('xsl:vendor-url') }/
   /info
/xsl:template

(maybe added in the original stylesheet, using xsl:comment to put this
info in a comment in the original output, using exactly the same system
to run the transform).

  JAXP is not always giving you the processor implementation you think
it would ;-)

  Regards,

--drkm























  
_ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Saxon 9

2008-08-19 Thread Florent Georges 
Dave Pawson wrote:

  Hi Dave,

 That would be a nice piece of debug information to add either way?
 Especially as docbook moves towards v5 and xslt 2.0

  Yes, good idea.  It would be nice to have something like the
following in each docbook.xsl (for XSL-FO, HTML, XHTML, ...), somewhere
near the top of the template rule matching /:

xsl:comment
   xsl:text_#10;Version:/xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:version')/
   xsl:text_#10;Vendor: /xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:vendor')/
   xsl:text_#10;Vendor URL: /xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:vendor-url')/
   xsl:text_#10;/xsl:text
/xsl:comment

in order to have a comment like this one at the top of each generated
file:

!--
   Version:2.0
   Vendor: SAXON 9.0.0.6 from Saxonica
   Vendor URL: http://www.saxonica.com/
--

  Regards,

--drkm






















  
_ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Saxon 9

2008-08-19 Thread Dave Pawson 

Florent Georges wrote:


  If I am right, even with version=1.0, Saxon 9 should recognize
xsl:result-document.  But is it really Saxon 9?  I would test it for
real with something like:

xsl:template match=/
   info
  version info={ system-property('xsl:version') }/
  vendor info={ system-property('xsl:vendor') }/
  vendor-url info={ system-property('xsl:vendor-url') }/
   /info
/xsl:template

(maybe added in the original stylesheet, using xsl:comment to put this
info in a comment in the original output, using exactly the same system
to run the transform).

  JAXP is not always giving you the processor implementation you think
it would ;-)



That would be a nice piece of debug information to add either way?
Especially as docbook moves towards v5 and xslt 2.0

Very useful for this list at least!


regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Saxon 9

2008-08-19 Thread Dave Pawson 

Florent Georges wrote:

Dave Pawson wrote:

  Hi Dave,


That would be a nice piece of debug information to add either way?
Especially as docbook moves towards v5 and xslt 2.0


  Yes, good idea.  It would be nice to have something like the
following in each docbook.xsl (for XSL-FO, HTML, XHTML, ...), somewhere
near the top of the template rule matching /:

xsl:comment
   xsl:text_#10;Version:/xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:version')/
   xsl:text_#10;Vendor: /xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:vendor')/
   xsl:text_#10;Vendor URL: /xsl:text
   xsl:value-of select=system-property('xsl:vendor-url')/
   xsl:text_#10;/xsl:text
/xsl:comment

in order to have a comment like this one at the top of each generated
file:

!--
   Version:2.0
   Vendor: SAXON 9.0.0.6 from Saxonica
   Vendor URL: http://www.saxonica.com/
--



For the fo output, (guessing that newbies don't look at the fo)
perhaps an xsl:message?

So many people rely on the installed Java for the transform,
it might be instructive for them to see
which engine they were using?

regards



regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[docbook-apps] Re: Saxon 9

2008-08-18 Thread Norman Walsh 
/ Mauritz Jeanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
| -Original Message-
| From: Lillian Sullam 
| 
| I'm trying to use a XSLT 2.0 to translate C# XML to DocBook 
| XML.  I use a Saxon processor and it doesn't seem to 
| recognize the XSLT xsl:result-document  Does any one know 
| why this is happening?
|
| The subject line says Saxon 9. Are you sure you are using that version?
| xsl:result-document is an XSLT 2.0 instruction, and it is undoubtedly
| recognized by Saxon 9.

Perhaps you forgot to say 'version=2.0' on your xsl:stylesheet element?

Be seeing you,
  norm

-- 
Norman Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | The belief in a supernatural
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | source of evil is not necessary;
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | men alone are quite capable of
   | every wickedness.--Joseph Conrad


pgpnnba8M0irE.pgp
Description: PGP signature