Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Generated text survey

2001-03-29 Thread Kevin Dunn
Will anyone familiar with a language that requires more sophisticated gentext, please describe what the rules are? I'm not looking for a specific stylesheet solution, just a description of the problem to be solved. I'm not sure this is what you're asking for, but I have a nit to pick on

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Generated text survey

2001-03-29 Thread Jon Willeke
I pointed this out a while back: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/26/msg00026.html An xref to a section has the trailing period, as well. I proposed a kludge at the time, but I'd love it if someone more fluent in XSLT could fix it for good. At 03:00 PM 3/29/01 -0500,

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Generated text survey

2001-03-29 Thread Jirka Kosek
Jon Willeke wrote: I pointed this out a while back: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/26/msg00026.html An xref to a section has the trailing period, as well. I proposed a kludge at the time, but I'd love it if someone more fluent in XSLT could fix it for good.

Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Generated text survey

2001-03-29 Thread Norman Walsh
/ Jon Willeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: | I pointed this out a while back: | |http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-apps/26/msg00026.html | | An xref to a section has the trailing period, as well. I proposed a kludge | at the time, but I'd love it if someone more

DOCBOOK-APPS: Generated text survey

2001-03-27 Thread Norman Walsh
At the moment, the DocBook stylesheets have somewhat limited support for generated text. Basically, all you can do easily is put a word or phrase in front of a title or cross reference. I've broken a whole bunch of stuff with respect to gentext, so I thought I should try to fix this problem