Ron Catterall wrote:
1. Is Oxygen corrupting the pure XML distinction between structure and
presentation by introducing 'bold' and 'italic' into XML when what they
should be doing is offering different ways of emphasizing text. The
Oxygen solution is no different to what I do when I use
Ron Catterall wrote:
2. Is Docbook lacking in structural elements? Particularly in different
types of emphasis. This I think is the real problem. I think we can
all agree that a block element such as chapter is a structural
element, so is a section and a para etc. When we come to in-line
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 03 de octubre de 2007 15:31
Para: 'DocBook Apps Mailing List'
Asunto: RE: [docbook-apps] oXygen 9 beta with WYSIWYG-like editing
supportforDocBook
Sorry Elliotte, I did mean to distort your argument. I did think that was
your idea but, obviously, I
: Pedro Pastor
CC: 'DocBook Apps Mailing List'
Asunto: Re: [docbook-apps] oXygen 9 beta with WYSIWYG-like editing
supportforDocBook
Pedro Pastor wrote:
Hi,
My previous message was sent in parallel with some other responses and I'd
like to make two points to some of them.
Making clear that my
I have thoroughly enjoyed reading the last two dozen or so emails on
this topic. I'm late joining in, but that's just one of the problems
of living a long way west of Greenwich.
It seems to me that there are two distinct problems.
1. Is Oxygen corrupting the pure XML distinction between
