maxwell writes:
> It's too late now, I'm sure, but as a user of DocBook for purposes
> other than software documentation (we use it for grammars), DocBook
> seems bloated with all these tags for software (the aforementioned
> being a perfect example).
Yes. Well. Fair
Stefan Seefeld writes:
> Yes, at this point it's not possible to remove all the original synopsis
> elements, so we'll have to live with them. But if users switch to the
> API extension (if it turns out to be useful to anyone outside a small
> community, that is), these
Aristedes Maniatis writes:
> I guess I'm just not understanding a fundamental concept in docbook
> then. I had always assumed docbook was a pure documentation schema and
> not intended to model real world concepts. When I look at
Well. Every now and then, we've been persuaded to