Please always add your signature at the end of your reply by clicking on
the "Signature and timestamp" button between Italics and Link button.
Consult this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Talk_pages
Use : for indenting your replies, so the hierarchy is communicated (see
the help
Thanks Olivier, that's fine.
I've put a useless test comment on the ACOS page. We'd better remember
to initial our comments so that Ronnie knows who has raised each one.
Regards,
Steve
-- Original Message --
From: "Olivier Hallot"
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Sent:
Hi Steve
Each wiki page has (after login) a discussion tab on the top left.
It appeared to me a good place to add comments on the page being edited,
about the technicalities...
Olivier
Em 02/09/2020 10:20, Steve (GMail) escreveu:
> Hi Ronnie and Olivier,
>
> During our Monday meeting, I
Yes, I agree. I'll do that as you suggested. Also regarding comments I
think Olivier can better tell.
Regards,
Ronnie
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, 6:55 pm Steve (GMail),
wrote:
> Hi Ronnie,
>
> Since you mention the ABS function, I quite like the description of its
> argument (because the argument may
Hi Ronnie,
Since you mention the ABS function, I quite like the description of its
argument (because the argument may be a cell reference rather than a
number). The same applies to ACOS and many other functions.
Hence would the first line of the Arguments section for ACOS read better
as
Hi Ronnie and Olivier,
During our Monday meeting, I think it was suggested that we could record
comments within the wiki itself (rather than via email). Is that so and
what's the best way to do this?
Regards,
Steve
-- Original Message --
From: "GANDHI RONNIE"
To: "Steve (GMail)"
Hello Steve,
Done!
> I don't think there's any need to change the wording throughout to
> reflect the name "arccosine". I just thought it would be worth
> mentioning in the Summary sub-section that "inverse trigonometric
> cosine" and "arccosine", and maybe even "arccos", are just different
>
Hi Regina,
Some months ago, we had some email correspondence about including a
description of the use of MULTIPLE.OPERATIONS as a normal function in
the Calc Functions wiki
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Calc_Functions). At
the time you sent me a link to a German wiki
Hi Ronnie,
Thanks for your feedback.
I don't think there's any need to change the wording throughout to
reflect the name "arccosine". I just thought it would be worth
mentioning in the Summary sub-section that "inverse trigonometric
cosine" and "arccosine", and maybe even "arccos", are just
Steve,
If you believe that gif isn't needed then we can have simple png for these
functions and only in a special case we will opt for gifs?
Regards,
Ronnie
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:44 PM GANDHI RONNIE wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
>> As Olivier commented, this update
For Calc:
POWER(0,0)=1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136387
For Writer
Concordance files:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136320
Page count
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135861
--
Olivier Hallot
LibreOffice Documentation
Thanks Ilmari and Mark,
I'm happy to update the section in the 7.0 Calc Guide (which is
currently in preparation) but I'm still confused. Why does the z-test
tool think that the variance of the given data sets is zero? As you say
Ilmari, that is not a number that the user currently enters.
Thanks! That was my gut feeling.
So the immediate action would be to change the screenshots in Help and
Calc guide so the variance cells have non-zero values, also adding a
note to the instructions.
A further question is, should we consider adding fields for inputting
variance values into
13 matches
Mail list logo
