Sure Steve thanks. Will do that now.
Regards,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020, 2:58 pm Steve Fanning,
wrote:
> Hi Ronnie,
>
> Please link both pages to the ODF's WORKDAY function but explain that:
>
> (1) Calc's WORKDAY function does not support the optional Workdays
> argument that is specified in the ODF
Hi Ronnie,
Please link both pages to the ODF's WORKDAY function but explain that:
(1) Calc's WORKDAY function does not support the optional Workdays
argument that is specified in the ODF. Also, with regards to the issues
you raise concerning the example definitions of the work week, please
wo
For this issue:
WORKDAY.INTL seems linked to WORKDAY of ODF based on the parameters but
Weekend accepts 1 to 17 or 011 type of string.
So both functions are somehow similar to ODF function WORKDAY. So which one
to link?
> The function WORKDAY in help pages and also its implementation has onl
Hello Olivier and Steve,
The function WORKDAY in help pages and also its implementation has only the
first 3 parameters whereas ODF section has 4 parameters. Also ODF mentions
passing {0;0;0;0;0;1;1} or {1;0;0;0;0;0;1} or even this {0;0;0;1;1;1;1} as
the Holiday parameter which when I tried does
so far. If you spot any more, please
carry
on emailing
>>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding
the
issue to the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steve
;>> >> Ronnie Gandhi
> >>>> >> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>>> >> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>>> >> +91-07874243430
> >>>> >>
> >
before adding the
issue to the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> -- Original Message --
>>> From: "Steve (GMail)" mailto:stevemfanning...@gmail.c
> >> >>> From: "Steve (GMail)" >> <mailto:stevemfanning...@gmail.com>>
> >> >>> To: "GANDHI RONNIE" >> <mailto:gron...@cs.iitr.ac.in>>
> >> >>> Cc: "Ol
re, please carry
on emailing
>>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding the
issue to the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> -- Original Message --
;>> Ronnie, please have a quick look and see if I've missed any of
> the issues
> >>> that you have raised so far. If you spot any more, please carry
> on emailing
> >>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding the
> issue
D20.odt". We can discuss
> >>> these during our weekly Tuesday meetings as required.
> >>>
> >>> Ronnie, please have a quick look and see if I've missed any of the
> issues
> >>> that you have raised so far. If you spot any more, pleas
k before adding the issue to the
list.
Regards,
Steve
-- Original Message --
From: "Steve (GMail)"
To: "GANDHI RONNIE"
Cc: "Olivier Hallot" ; "Documentation
Team"
Sent: 25/10/2020 13:57:15
Subject: Re[4]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 -
rry on
>>> emailing
>>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding the issue
>>> to the
>>> list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> -- Original Message --
>>> From: "
please carry on emailing
>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding the issue to the
>> list.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ------ Original Message --
>> From: "Steve (GMail)"
>> To: "GANDHI RONNIE"
g
report on this.
Regards,
Steve
-- Original Message --
From: "GANDHI RONNIE"
To: "Steve (GMail)"
Cc: "Olivier Hallot" ; "Documentation
Team"
Sent: 25/10/2020 10:46:58
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible Error
in H
on Wizard contains text which indicates that
> the parameter is optional when, in fact, it is required. I will raise a bug
> report on this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
> -- Original Message ------
> From: "GANDHI RONNIE"
> To: "Steve (GMail)"
> Cc:
sue to the list.
Regards,
Steve
-- Original Message --
From: "Steve (GMail)"
To: "GANDHI RONNIE"
Cc: "Olivier Hallot" ; "Documentation
Team"
Sent: 25/10/2020 13:57:15
Subject: Re[4]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible Error
: "GANDHI RONNIE"
To: "Steve (GMail)"
Cc: "Olivier Hallot" ; "Documentation
Team"
Sent: 25/10/2020 10:46:58
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible
Error in Help pages
Hello Steve and Olivier,
I have found some more e
to say that the default is the probability density
> function.
>
> Olivier, if you agree, would you like me to make the change via Gerrit?
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
> -- Original Message ------
> From: "GANDHI RONNIE"
> To: "Steve (GMail)&q
eam"
Sent: 18/10/2020 17:20:43
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible Error in
Help pages
Hello Steve and Olivier,
I found one more erroneous function in help pages. HYPEGEOMDIST's
description of cumulative parameter's last statement is wrong. It
states
"
> To: documentat...@libreoffice.org; "Documentation Team"
>
> Sent: 04/10/2020 19:05:41
> Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible Error in Help
> pages
>
> >Hello Olivier and Steve,
> >
> >I could sense an error on the help pa
umentation Team"
Sent: 04/10/2020 19:05:41
Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible Error in Help
pages
Hello Olivier and Steve,
I could sense an error on the help pages for BETA.INV and BETAINV function.
The definition of Number is wrong. It states Number to be betwe
Hello Olivier and Steve,
I could sense an error on the help pages for BETA.INV and BETAINV function.
The definition of Number is wrong. It states Number to be between Start and
End but actually it is the probability which is associated with BETA
function for other given arguments and the output wi
23 matches
Mail list logo
