Hi Hazel,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> Well, I am definitely not signing up to Twitter or Facebook. I have
> better things to to with my time.
Twitter would be just part of a panoply of means of communication -
more "output only". Alerts (about stuff published, resource
Hi :)
I often find it easier to go through doing 1 process at a time and then go
through again for the other mission. An odd note or 2 jic i don't spot
something i may have noticed while my attention drifted from the mission at
hand. I'm not sure if you folks find the same. I guess it's diffe
I think the process we choose should allow for and encourage, but not require,
the steps or roles of reviewer, proofreader, etc even if we skip some steps (as
indeed we do) or one person does several steps. I'll write more when I'm not on
the phone.
Jean
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
On 07/08/2012, at 4:22, Hazel Russman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:28:43 +0300
> David Nelson wrote:
>
>> Most of all, I'd definitely recommend revising the file naming
>> conventions and taking advantage of Alfresco's built-in versioning.
>
> +1 to that.
>
Yes. I'm sure I said the file n
Hi David, all,
Am 07.08.2012 11:28, schrieb David Nelson:
[...]
We *really* have a fuzzy, fluid organization.
And we are proud of it. ;-)
[...]
However, IMHO, it would be good to start using Alfresco's blogging
facilities, maybe it's wiki functionality, and it's automated email
alerts and RS
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:28:43 +0300
David Nelson wrote:
> You could also consider Twitter as a good channel for updates, both
> automated and manual. Using Twitter would do away with the need to
> sign-up for and follow a mailing list, and put you closer to potential
> contributors from the huge T
Hi Hazel, Jean, guys,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> Reviewing and proofreading are two very different activities. A
> reviewer needs to be knowledgeable about the software being described,
> so that he/she can check the accuracy of every statement made about it.
> A proof
