Re: [Dorset] Slightly O/T: Technical authoring decisions...

2009-07-09 Thread Terry Coles
On Wednesday 08 Jul 2009, Hugh Frater wrote: Okay, so I've decided that I want to write some technical documentation for one of our software packages here at work. I would like to be able to deliver a help system for windows (chm probably - some of our user base uses 2k pro) as well as a

[Dorset] Slightly O/T: Technical authoring decisions...

2009-07-08 Thread Hugh Frater
Okay, so I've decided that I want to write some technical documentation for one of our software packages here at work. I would like to be able to deliver a help system for windows (chm probably - some of our user base uses 2k pro) as well as a nicely styled paper/pdf manual from the same source.

Re: [Dorset] Slightly O/T: Technical authoring decisions...

2009-07-08 Thread Peter Merchant
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 13:28 +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Hi Hugh, Should I try and tackle what seems like a steep learning curve and use XML DocBook...? This seems to offer what I need but it does seem to be a little less polished than LaTeX. Is DocBook to CHM straighforward these

Re: [Dorset] Slightly O/T: Technical authoring decisions...

2009-07-08 Thread Andrew Morgan
Hugh Frater wrote: I know that microsoft now want to eol CHM support and move to something else (I can't remember what exactly though) and this replacement might be easier? In vista, looking in %WINDIR%\Help there are quite a few files ending in .h1s. These appear to be MAML format.

Re: [Dorset] Slightly O/T: Technical authoring decisions...

2009-07-08 Thread Hugh Frater
And to throw another spanner in the works, I've just discovered reStructuredText which looks rather sweet... Hugh -- Next meeting: Dorchester, Tuesday 2009-07-07 20:00 Dorset LUG: http://dorset.lug.org.uk/ Chat: http://www.mibbit.com/?server=irc.blitzed.orgchannel=%23dorset List info: