25.06.2013 11:47, Eric W. Biederman пишет:
> Mateusz Viste writes:
>
>> I think there is no point refreshing the bsd stack used in slirp (iirc
>> it uses the stack of a 4.4 bsd), because it is used only between slirp
>> and dosemu anyway. Between slirp and the outside world only 'normal'
>> host's
And to the note, Eric's address fails with this:
---
ebied...@xmission.com
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO::
host mx.xmission.com [166.70.12.20]: 550-XM-RJCT22:
[94.100.176.90] is prohibited from connecting to XMission mail
550-servers due to high spam volume. Se
After a quick look, I see that slirpvde is to VDE what my taprouter is
to TAP interfaces (that is, a glue between a layer 2 architecture -
TAP/VDE - and a layer 3 tunnel provided by slirp).
With the difference that slirpvde ripped most of its code from Qemu,
while I implemented the whole DHCP/AR
28.06.2013 19:11, Mateusz Viste пишет:
> After a quick look, I see that slirpvde is to VDE what my taprouter is
> to TAP interfaces (that is, a glue between a layer 2 architecture -
> TAP/VDE - and a layer 3 tunnel provided by slirp).
How would you then interpret this:
---
vde_plug2tap is another p
On 06/28/2013 05:31 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> How would you then interpret this:
> ---
> vde_plug2tap is another plug tool that can be connected to vde_switches.
> Instead of using standard input and standard output for network I/O
> everything that come from vde_switch to the plug is redirected to
28.06.2013 20:42, Mateusz Viste пишет:
>> This has the downsides too. dosemu releases are so
>> infrequent that the new features of slirp, if any, will be
>> delayed for too long.
> Sure. But on the other hand, if it works today, there's no reason it
> will stop working tomorrow ;)
But there may be
On 06/28/2013 07:12 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> But there may be new features added, like pings.
> There are the efforts to allow pings/icmp without a root
> requirement:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/420801/
> Not sure if that happened already or not.
Sure, there is plenty of features we can imagine in
On 06/28/2013 07:38 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> if $_netdev is empty (or undefinied), then we use an internal, embedded
> slirp for user-friendliness, else we use the one specified in $_netdev.
>
> This would have the benefit of providing a DOSemu internet connectivity
> that works out of the box, a
28.06.2013 21:38, Mateusz Viste пишет:
>> If VDE does not replace any of your code, then I immediately
>> stop talking about it. :) (since anyway it doesn't seem to have
>> any advantages on other fronts too)
> Well, it does replace pretty much all of my code - since both
> librouter and vdeslirp
On 06/28/2013 09:42 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Well, but you wanted to embed slirp anyway, and haven't
> started that yet. So maybe it would be the same cost to
> evaluate the embedding of slirp and the cost of embedding
> vde? :)
In fact, I don't think embedding slirp is a good thing anymore.
I fi
29.06.2013 01:10, Mateusz Viste пишет:
> On 06/28/2013 09:42 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> Well, but you wanted to embed slirp anyway, and haven't
>> started that yet. So maybe it would be the same cost to
>> evaluate the embedding of slirp and the cost of embedding
>> vde? :)
> In fact, I don't think
11 matches
Mail list logo
