[Dosemu-devel] dosemu build

2009-08-25 Thread solarflow99
hi, I am just trying to build dosemu and wondered what this error meant? I have fedora 10 and surely the latest version of binutils. I know it builds on F-10 just fine, but this is a mock build where everything needed to be pulled in with buildrequires, maybe something is missing? binutils-2.18

Re: [Dosemu-devel] dosemu build

2009-08-31 Thread solarflow99
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Samuel Bronson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:36 PM, solarflow99 > wrote: > > hi, I am just trying to build dosemu and wondered what this error meant? > I > > have fedora 10 and surely the latest version of binutils. I know it >

[Dosemu-devel] dosemu for Fedora

2009-09-17 Thread solarflow99
Hi,I just thought i'd announce that dosemu is finally available for fedora. The current package is a SVN snapshot (1905) and is currently in the F-10 free repo in RPM Fusion, i'm working on adding it into F-11 and so on. So to install, just enable RPM Fusion for yum, and do a "yum install dosemu"

Re: [Dosemu-devel] DosEmu and newer Cpu's - please support Cpu family 16 (AMD Phenom, Opteron 23xx, Opteron 83xx) or select it by the cpu flags

2009-09-22 Thread solarflow99
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:38 PM, solarflow99 wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:03 PM, SINGER Bernd NLTD-G (AREVA NP GmbH) < > bernd.sin...@areva.com> wrote: > >> > from: Bart Oldeman [mailto:bartolde...@gmail.com] >> > > wrote: >> > >

[Dosemu-devel] dosemu package in RPMfusion

2009-10-25 Thread solarflow99
Hi, Just thought i'd post that there is now an RPM available for dosemu in RPMFusion updates-testing repo F-11. It takes the latest SVN release 1988. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Hoo boy! This is going to be interesting.

2010-10-08 Thread solarflow99
not sure, have you tried dosemu -sAlso you didn't say which version of dosemu you are using. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Steve Cohen wrote: > Okay, I am engaged in an effort trying to determine whether or not DOSEMU > offers any hope as a path to porting a complicated legacy DOS applic

[Dosemu-devel] svn 2053 problem

2011-09-03 Thread solarflow99
Has anyone noticed a problem with svn 2053 in Fedora 15 i686? It just hangs at the command line, here is the tail end output of strace: ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or SNDRV_TIMER_IOCTL_NEXT_DEVICE or TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0 fstat64(0, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0620, st_rdev=make

[Dosemu-devel] svn 2053

2011-09-05 Thread solarflow99
has anyone even tried svn 2053? does it work at all? -- Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs

Re: [Dosemu-devel] svn 2053

2011-09-05 Thread solarflow99
oh ya.. It seems to be a problem with package builds on rpmfusion, when I rpmbuild on my own system it works. Strange.. Here is the strace output anyways: Thanks guys.. # strace dosemu.bin execve("/usr/bin/dosemu.bin", ["dosemu.bin"], [/* 46 vars */]) = 0 brk(0)

[Dosemu-devel] svn 2053

2011-09-07 Thread solarflow99
I'd have to assume it was a problem with the build system to make it hang there like that, its wierd. Unless there's a missing dependancy, but then it shouldn't even compile, here's what is pulled in in case anyone notices something missing: BuildRequires:bison BuildRequires:flex BuildRe

Re: [Dosemu-devel] svn 2053

2011-09-09 Thread solarflow99
onfigure --enable-debug > or set "debug on" in compiletime-settings before running configure, > or run > ./default-configure -d > before running "make". > > Bart > > On 7 September 2011 23:08, solarflow99 wrote: > > ok, Thanks. I just can't fi

Re: [Dosemu-devel] mappable conventional memory support

2012-04-12 Thread solarflow99
Glad you got it to work then, all the legacy code still left must make it hard to change anything without breaking something else. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hello. > > I needed to run some commercial DOS-based multitasking > environment recently, which doesn't work

[Dosemu-devel] svn

2012-05-29 Thread solarflow99
Hi, I had about 4 - 5 simple changes i'd like to commit to svn, since this is 1 time only and I don't want to risk messing anything up, what is the best way I can do this? Thanks, -- Live Security Virtual Conference Excl

Re: [Dosemu-devel] svn

2012-05-29 Thread solarflow99
svn in the name. Thanks Stas, On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 29.05.2012 21:24, solarflow99 wrote: >> Hi, I had about 4 - 5 simple changes i'd like to commit to svn, since > dosemu uses git already. > >> this is 1 time only and I don't want to ris

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Fwd: DOSEMU for Linux project inactivity?

2012-10-19 Thread solarflow99
I have been doing RPM releases to rpmfusion for quite a while. Just because the dosemu site doesn't have anything, maybe there should be a link to there. Here is the F-17 x86_64 package for example: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/17/x86_64/repoview/dosemu.html On Fri, Oct

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Fwd: DOSEMU for Linux project inactivity?

2012-10-19 Thread solarflow99
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Bart Oldeman wrote: > Hi, > >>> I have been doing RPM releases to rpmfusion for quite a while. Just >>> because the dosemu site doesn't have anything, maybe there should be a >>> link to there. Here is the F-17 x86_64 package for example: >>> >>> http://download1

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Fwd: DOSEMU for Linux project inactivity?

2012-10-20 Thread solarflow99
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hi, > > 20.10.2012 05:00, Bart Oldeman пишет: >> >> I agree that a release is long overdue (I planned 1.4.1 in 2008 but >> never got around to it!), and "current git" while a moving target and >> "current svn" before that have been almost alwa

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Fwd: DOSEMU for Linux project inactivity?

2012-10-21 Thread solarflow99
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hello. > > 20.10.2012 20:12, solarflow99 пишет: >> >> I just don't know about the changes and new features that go in the >> news file. > > Understood... Lets make this a collective effort > then:

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Fwd: DOSEMU for Linux project inactivity?

2012-10-21 Thread solarflow99
> We didn't have 1.5 I think, so why not 1.5? > I'd call it 1.4.X, but I know people these days suddenly > started to hate 3-number scheme, so whatever. its fine by me, if someone can create a 1.5 tag then, I can build and test with that. I see you submit most of the patches, so any fixes you put

[Dosemu-devel] patches

2013-01-05 Thread solarflow99
hi Stas, I was about to create a RPM release for F-18, and was wondering if you had a chance to add at least 1 of my patches at this time? http://sourceforge.net/p/dosemu/patches/100/ http://sourceforge.net/p/dosemu/patches/105/ The second one can wait, but the first one would be nice to have i

[Dosemu-devel] patch

2013-01-07 Thread solarflow99
Hi, I did a git clone: git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/dosemu/code dosemu-code and noticed the change wasn't in there, maybe this is why? status: open --> accepted milestone: --> Unstable_(example) Thanks,

[Dosemu-devel] excellent bug fix

2013-01-07 Thread solarflow99
FYI, with your patch, I can get a successful build for Fedora 18. nice... http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.msdos.dosemu.devel/130 -- Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS and more.

[Dosemu-devel] dosemu error

2013-01-12 Thread solarflow99
using the devel branch, I am getting this error: # dosemu -s Running as root in full feature mode ALSA lib pulse.c:243:(pulse_connect) PulseAudio: Unable to connect: Connection refused ERROR: SDL sound init failed: No available audio device ERROR: PCM: "Sound Output: SDL device" failed to open

[Dosemu-devel] latest devel build

2013-01-13 Thread solarflow99
I was just wondering if anyone had any feedback about this problem I noticed so I know if it should be released? Isn't there a way to disable sound so it will work? Stas? Thanks, -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQ

Re: [Dosemu-devel] latest devel build

2013-01-14 Thread solarflow99
> I think the better solution would be to let Justin to do the testing > and decide whether or not it suits. He already claims to have found > some $_sound=(0) bug, but I think that's the false alarm - works > perfectly here (needs a -D9+Sc log to justify). from the boot log now I can see its not

[Dosemu-devel] dos

2013-01-15 Thread solarflow99
http://sourceforge.net/blog/potm-201301/ -- Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tu

Re: [Dosemu-devel] undefined reference to `sb_mixer_register_write'

2013-01-28 Thread solarflow99
There is a RPM available in case you need, fairly recent. http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/17/x86_64/repoview/dosemu.html > I think no, my script does all work from download to build and package > dosemu RPM. > Now when I apply these Barts patches (vgaemu.c video.c console.c >

[Dosemu-devel] console and ssh

2013-01-30 Thread solarflow99
This is a simple question, I was just wondering what is the preferred method of running for the console was, I was trying to test some games and other programs and most won't work unless i'm in an xterm: dosemu -s -D9+Sc -f /etc/dosemu/dosemu.conf Any changes needed for dosemu.conf for this?

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Odd problem with WordPerfect under latest git

2013-02-10 Thread solarflow99
Thanks for reporting the error anyways. Do you know if this is new problem, or did it work in previous versions? Also what arch is this? I bet its x86_64 right? On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Edward Mendelson wrote: > Here is a very strange problem that someone reported to me, and which I

[Dosemu-devel] dosemu over an ssh session

2013-03-11 Thread solarflow99
I just had this question in case anyone has had success running games and other programs this way? -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "rema

Re: [Dosemu-devel] dosemu over an ssh session

2013-03-11 Thread solarflow99
I mean without X11 at all. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 12.03.2013 00:34, solarflow99 пишет: >> I just had this question in case anyone has had success running games >> and other programs this way?

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Revisit COPYING.DOSEMU (Re: DOSEMU Version 2 has been Released)

2013-07-21 Thread solarflow99
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hi, thanks for getting involved into this. > Lets discuss it a little more then. My intention here > is NOT to push such a changes one way or another - > that's what I care the least. BUT, it is very important > to do the good research on tha

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Revisit COPYING.DOSEMU (Re: DOSEMU Version 2 has been Released)

2013-07-21 Thread solarflow99
ok, I don't disagree. Also, I read on the FSF site one way to deal with this kind of problem was to say something like "GPL 3 and any future version" On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 21.07.2013 20:09, solarflow99 пишет: > >> On Sun, Jul 21, 20

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Revisit COPYING.DOSEMU (Re: DOSEMU Version 2 has been Released)

2013-07-22 Thread solarflow99
> Except as a code cleanup I don't see you raising any valid concerns at > this point. And a code cleanup to licensing terms frankly adds a lot > more confusion than it is worth. Unless there is an actual problem > let's please concentrate on the code and getting out a release > before the end of

Re: [Dosemu-devel] merge devel and release something

2014-09-20 Thread solarflow99
+1 assuming there's isn't any reason against. The dosemu site shows old releases as stable, maybe we can update the version to 1.6 at least, 1.4 is very old now. On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 20.09.2014 21:55, Eric Auer пишет: > >> The only reason I didn't merge devel

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Issue with dosemu after upgrade to Fedora 22?

2015-09-15 Thread solarflow99
is this 64 bit? are you using the RPM? On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > During my C++ course last semester I had used dosemu to show the > students the old borland c++ compiler with linux using Fedora 21 and > dosemu to run the bc program and it worked great. Update

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Issue with dosemu after upgrade to Fedora 22?

2015-09-16 Thread solarflow99
I suspect its just a bug with the 64 bit version, some programs, usually games have experienced problems running in 64 bit. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > On 15 Sep 2015 at 16:51, solarflow99 wrote: > > Date sent: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:51

Re: [Dosemu-devel] DOSEMU2 on this list

2015-12-22 Thread solarflow99
This is it On Dec 22, 2015 1:09 AM, wrote: > Hello all > > Is this used for discusion about the DOSEMU_2_ too or is there a new one > / other location ? > > Andreas > > > -- > _

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Is DOSEMU2 intended running on kernels like 3.2 ?

2015-12-25 Thread solarflow99
I'd like to update the docs with this info. Any way I can help do that Stas? On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Bart Oldeman wrote: > Hello Andreas, > > On 22 December 2015 at 07:38, wrote: >> Thank you for your reply. I'm on 32-bit and my goal there is to stay >> with "vm86" for speed. So I don

Re: [Dosemu-devel] Is DOSEMU2 intended running on kernels like 3.2 ?

2015-12-28 Thread solarflow99
not since the last 10 years or so On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote: > 24.12.2015 06:06, Bart Oldeman пишет: >> Hello Andreas, >> >> On 22 December 2015 at 07:38, mailto:bo...@geodb.org>> >> wrote: >>> Thank you for your reply. I'm on 32-bit and my goal there is to stay >>> wit