On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 20.10.2012 05:00, Bart Oldeman пишет:
>>
>> I agree that a release is long overdue (I planned 1.4.1 in 2008 but
>> never got around to it!), and "current git" while a moving target and
>> "current svn" before that have been almost always stable enough and
>> better than 1.4.0 to be used by distributions (this is in fact what
>> they've all been doing now for awhile AFAIK, RPMFusion as above, but
>> also Ubuntu/Debian, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, ALT Linux, and Mageia, a
>> quick google search reveals).
>
> Yes but do you still remember this:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/plucker-dev@rubberchicken.org/msg01892.html
> We can't expect them to use git snapshots forever, good that
> they still have a patience.
>
>> Just tarring up a git checkout will look a bit odd though, especially
>> the NEWS file (if there are volunteers who want to check the SF issues
>> for closed reports and read the git log to update it, it would be most
>> welcome -- otherwise I'll do it myself when I have more time again).
>> There's a backlog of SF issues that should be resolved (including also
>> updating the dosemu-freedos tarball, a lot more runs with FD 1.1 incl.
>> Windows 3.1) but it's not 100% necessary for a quick release.
>
> Exactly! This simply won't happen so why to bother.
> NEWS is fine but nothing else.
>
>> Family commitments leave me very little time for DOSEMU these days
>> though I'll try. Then there is a little thing called a version number:
>> 1.4.1? 1.6.0? Or just do as Linus and call it 2.0?
>
> No, please, we had already 1.0 which was as buggy as hell, and
> completely unfixable for a quick update, or for a long update, or
> at all. Not again. :)
> If the development is ever to be healthy again, we can define a
> set of goals for 2.0, but playing with numbers without doing any
> real work is unforgivable (but then firefox will disagree).
>
> Justin, are you willing to take care of the NEWS file and make a
> kind of a release for SF?


I just don't know about the changes and new features that go in the
news file.  Do you have some goals in mind for a release?  It would be
great to set some goals and stabilize before releasing it this time,
but with such a lack of developer time it may not happen.  I can make
some kind of release for SF, I see most of it is out of date on there.
 But I think distro packages are what most people are using.   Are you
suggesting we update the news file, stabilize what there is now and
release it?


BTW, I think that link above is obsolete now, and that was before
fedora existed,  taking the current git has been the way its done for
a while now.

Thanks,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Dosemu-devel mailing list
Dosemu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dosemu-devel

Reply via email to