Re: [DOTNET] Screen capturing in dotnet

some fast BitBlt's - which is basically what a screengrab is. ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Nick Wienholt" <

Re: [DOTNET] Displaying info on loading forms

--- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Mark Boulter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Displaying info on

[DOTNET] C++ watch window and pointers

Anyone know if there's a way to persuade VS.NET to display the values of C++ pointers in the watch window? (As opposed to trying to dereference them). Ta! Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinso

[DOTNET] Displaying info on loading forms

tend it. Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] Setting properties

That one is a cool idea. Ta Graeme! Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Graeme Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DOTNET] Setting properties

parately, either by making them readonly and having a set method, as a couple of people have suggested, or having an immutable class, which will have the same impat on client code. Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobi

[DOTNET] Setting properties

s, and I'm trying to figure out if there's any way of doing this that's consistent with the normal .NET usage guidelines that it should be acceptable to set properties in any order. Any ideas? Is what I want to do possible? Simon -----

Re: [DOTNET] Lame compiler error of the day...

Just out of interest, why do you need a line that long? Don't you find it a bit difficult to read? :) Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Ori

Re: [DOTNET] Why does Substring() throw?

st character and '=' not being present. That might be what you want in a particular situation but I would imagine in most cases it would be desirable to separate those situations. Simon --- Sim

Re: [DOTNET] Convert Hex to Decimal

You need to call uint.Parse(): uint i = uint.Parse(textBox1.Text, System.Globalization.NumberStyles.AllowHexSpecifier); Note that this method expects the plain number - eg. "20" will convert to 32, while "0x20" will throw an exception so you will want to check and strip off any leading "0x" f

Re: [DOTNET] Minimum VS.NET Requirements

Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Kevin Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:26 PM Subject:

Re: [DOTNET] String concatenation performance

e's little to choose between them. And yeah I'd agree that if you're doing this with strings from a database then a stored procedure is likely to be better anyway. Simon --- Simon Ro

Re: [DOTNET] String concatenation performance

the string. Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 03,

Re: [DOTNET] JIT optimization and inlining (again)

out what was going on, as well as several people on this list who made various suggestions) Simon ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message

Re: [DOTNET] Wrox

explicitly or shown the result for approval before printing.) Simon ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Tom Arch

Re: [DOTNET] Wrox

astly improved as a result of their efforts. Sorry for leaving them out. Simon ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Simo

Re: [DOTNET] Wrox

ns like that are always easier with hindsight aren't they :) Simon ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- - Original Message - From: "Paul Janssen&quo

Re: [DOTNET] Mixing MFC App and .NET Forms

son if you intend developing the app a lot further in future). If your MFC app is working fine at the moment then you could be giving yourself a lot of work for nothing. Hope that's of some help Simon --- Simon Robinson http://ww

Re: [DOTNET] MC++ help: managed/unmanaged DLL

m your description, the most likely problem is either you haven't copied the C++ assembly to the C# project directory or you've incorrectly specified a path or assembly name in the C# code. Simon --- Simon Robinson

[DOTNET] Another likely VS.NET bug

. (btw is there somewhere better than this list to report obvious bugs like that)? Simon --- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRobinson.com --- You can read messages from the DOTNET

Re: [DOTNET] NEWS: Google with .NET Api!

that .NET is one of the technologies you can use to access it (which kinda follows automatically from the fact that they are using SOAP protocols). So I don't think it's strictly correct to claim it's a .NET API Simon ----

Re: [DOTNET] Possible bug in VS.NET

the most up-to-date source file it has - the new one. That doesn't look like a bug to me - just you're not compiling the entire solution when you should be. SImon ------- Simon Robinson http://www.SimonRo

[DOTNET] gcroot for arguments and locals

error, and there's no word in the docs about using gcroot here. I'm assuming you are still supposed to use gcroot<> in all managed pointer declarations - can anyone confirm if that is correct? Simon --- Simon Robinson h