--- Kevin Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually have VS.NET on a PII/266 and 256Mb and
> for most cases it is quite
> adequate. But you mention migrating to Win2K. I am
> running XP Professional.
> And yes if I had my wish I would first get more
> memory.
>
>
Thanks Kevin,
Dell doesn't
Simon
---
Simon Robinson
http://www.SimonRobinson.com
---
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:26 PM
Subject:
I actually have VS.NET on a PII/266 and 256Mb and for most cases it is quite
adequate. But you mention migrating to Win2K. I am running XP Professional.
And yes if I had my wish I would first get more memory.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Penrod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri
I have been running VS.NET on my PII/266 notebook with 160mb RAM with Win2k
pro. Works great. Only a tad slower then my Athlon 800 at home. Definitely
useable.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Penrod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:43 PM
Sub
I ran the RC0 version on a PIII/450 with 256 MB of ram. It wasn't super
speedy, but if you turn off the dynamic help, it works out fine. If you have
256 or less, I would recommend getting another stick of memory, as that will
help more then a faster CPU.
Erick
- Original Message -
From:
