Hello everybody!
Currently, dovecot just kills itself if it detects that time has moved
backwards more than a hardcoded number of seconds. I accept the
reasons, but I do not like to restart dovecot manually after waiting
for time to move forward again. A cron job would not help, because
time
Hi
We have been running a dovecot server for some time.. users connect with
pop.
Now this server is going to be substituted with a new one.. before we
used mbox, but now we will move to maildir!
I have done some testing transfering the mail with the mb2md script, the
conversion works correctly,
Hi
We have been running a dovecot server for some time.. users connect with
pop.
Now this server is going to be substituted with a new one.. before we
used mbox, but now we will move to maildir!
I have done some testing transfering the mail with the mb2md script, the
conversion works correctly,
Hi
We have been running a dovecot server for some time.. users connect with
pop.
Now this server is going to be substituted with a new one.. before we
used mbox, but now we will move to maildir!
I have done some testing transfering the mail with the mb2md script, the
conversion works correctly,
Hi
We've been using dovecot successufly for few month.
Previous setup : solaris 8, postfix+LDA, mbox + index on NFS (Netapp),
2500 accounts
Everything shared overs NFS, multiple servers connect to index, mbox.
mail_location =
Dear Dovecot experts,
I have a small home server debian based, with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail
installed locally and working. Dovecot is used non-secured (no imaps) but
only on the 192.168.0.100 address (address of the server on the local
network). I want to use squirrelmail to read my email
On 02/05/2007 12:13, Eric wrote:
Dear Dovecot experts,
I have a small home server debian based, with postfix/dovecot/squirrelmail
installed locally and working. Dovecot is used non-secured (no imaps) but
only on the 192.168.0.100 address (address of the server on the local
network). I want to
Eric wrote:
I installed dovecot from scratch and compiled it from 1.0.0 source.
Installed in /usr/local.
Now everytime I launch dovecot it creates and uses
/usr/local/var/lib/dovecot and /usr/local/var/run/dovecot directories. For
the latter I found the modifications to do in dovecot.conf for
I'm having the same issue, but only with client using outlook (not
outlook express)
On 5/2/07, Lars Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We have been running a dovecot server for some time.. users connect with
pop.
Now this server is going to be substituted with a new one.. before we
used
On 5/2/07, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your answer. What do you mean by you may as well use 2 ?
You mean both authentication options ? I though we have to decide in
dovecot.conf to use one option or another one...
I do force the use of my webserver (lighttpd) through https. My
I submitted this question to the Postfix maillist and they suggested
that I post to this one.
Here's my issue:
I have a Postifx email system running on a CentOS 4 box, with Dovecot
pop3 and imap. Last week, one of my users reported to me that about a
dozen emails suddenly showed up in his in
Hi,
according to
http://wiki.dovecot.fi/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/AllowNets
there exists an option allow_nets to restrict IP ranges from where
users are allowed to login to Dovecot.
I am using Debian Etch with the official Dovecot packages:
# dpkg -l | grep dovecot
ii dovecot-common
Timo Sirainen wrote:
This school year is pretty much finished next thursday (for the classes
I intended to pass). After that I should again have enough energy to
read and answer the 150 mails in this list .. :) And maybe release
v1.0.1 fixing the newly found bugs.
Just curious, has there
On 2007-04-26, Adrian Stoica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is this ?
We just saw the same fault today when we switched from courier
to dovecot on a large system today. The ~username/dovecot-uidlist
contained:
1 -1 0
and deleting this file plus it's lockfile seems to have fixed the
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:19:36PM +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
I tried to add the line
allow_nets=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.0/16
in the block
passdb pam {
which is the default enabled auth code in Debian.
allow_nets is a passdb field (for example in an SQL passdb), not a
dovecot.conf
Sorry, here it is:
Version:
dovecot-0.99.11-4.EL4
## Dovecot 1.0 configuration file
imap_listen = *
pop3_listen = *
imaps_listen = *
pop3s_listen = *
log_path = /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
info_log_path = /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log
login_dir = /var/run/dovecot-login
login = imap
login = pop3
Problem solved by migrating to solaris 10 !
On 5/2/2007 Jason Baker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Sorry, here it is:
Version:
dovecot-0.99.11-4.EL4
Upgrade...
0.99 is no longer supported...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hello All,
I try to set up a read only maildir
just as in the wiki, to no avail.
The extra (public) namespace shows up but
I can not susbscribe to it (in thunderbird) or
if I change to that directory (in mutt),
it is empty.
Is it the problem mentioned in the wiki
The ACL documentation is at http://wiki.dovecot.org/ACL is a bit
vague... I'd be happy to update it myself, but I need some clarification:
For example, I have a dovecot-acl file with:
group=portal_admin lrw
anyone l
To me this means that any user in the portal_admin group should be able
to
If it's read-only, then your user can't write the 'subscriptions' file;
as root, edit that file and manually insert the subscription, then your
clients should pick it up.
Thanks for the quick reply.
Is it subscriptions or .subscriptions or in the singular
(without the ending s)? Where
Nagyon Almos wrote:
Is it subscriptions or .subscriptions or in the singular
(without the ending s)? Where should it be exactly?
If you run dovecot 0.99, it's .subscriptions; if you run dovecot 1.0,
it's subscriptions - so adjust as necessary. It is always located in the
Maildir/ directory
If you run dovecot 0.99, it's .subscriptions; if you run dovecot 1.0,
it's subscriptions - so adjust as necessary. It is always located in the
Maildir/ directory itself - take a look at your own personal maildir
folder and it should be pretty obvious.
It goes without saying that if you are
If you run dovecot 0.99, it's .subscriptions; if you run dovecot 1.0,
it's subscriptions - so adjust as necessary. It is always located in the
Maildir/ directory itself - take a look at your own personal maildir
folder and it should be pretty obvious.
The contents should be the name of the
hi,
i'm using dovecot 1.0 rc26 and i want to upgrade to dovecot 1.0; i want to
know if i must uninstall previus version or i can install overriding prevus
install .
Thanks in advance!!!
aza zel wrote:
hi,
i'm using dovecot 1.0 rc26 and i want to upgrade to dovecot 1.0; i want to
know if i must uninstall previus version or i can install overriding prevus
install .
Use the procedure recommended by the package maintainer for your distro...
Or, if you rolled your own, you
Zbigniew Szalbot writes:
I am using dovecot 1.0.0 and have only 5 pop3 users. However, I have
counted over 200 pop3-loging processes. I just wonder if it is normal for
dovecot (has been running maybe for 2-3 weeks after installing the stable
verion).
What is your login_processes_count in
Scott Silva writes:
If you want to experiment with a inexpensive NAS with replication, look at
Freenas. It can do nfs sharing and automatic replication with rsync.
And it is free and based on Freebsd. Still immature, but it has a lot of
promise.
Our experience with FreeBSD+NFS has been less
John Rowe writes:
gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new.
Thanks. Saw it on a list of distributed FS but didn't click on it.
I was planning to take a look at AFS and Coda to start. Will also take a
look at gluster, although so far it seems a Linux only FS.
Hi Timo and all,
I used to use Dovecot back in the 0.99 days a couple of years ago, had
since moved to Courier IMAP, but with the release of Dovecot 1.0.0, I'm
looking at moving back!
One thing I currently have set up and working with Courier is the use of
the enhanced IDLE mode, whereby
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/port-freebsd/2007-February/000199.html
The freebsd port looks like it might be a bit hairy yet though.
AFS and CODA are on my list to check.
Another user in this list mentioned Gluster.
I must say gluster looks very interesting.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:06:43PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
John Rowe writes:
gluster is looking extremely interesting although it's rather new.
Thanks. Saw it on a list of distributed FS but didn't click on it.
I was planning to take a look at AFS and Coda to start. Will also take
I can specified two passdb so I can mix auth source.
Can I do similar thing with userdb? I would like to have uid, gid and home
from static and quota from sql.
Regards,
Steve
33 matches
Mail list logo