Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hmm. I suppose I could change Dovecot master so that if no imap/pop3
processes have been created yet, it would silently ignore the clock move.
Also it might be an idea to just restart dovecot instead of completely
stopping it. If this happens to often in a certain time int
Hi
I've a problem. I've built a new mailserver for our company based on
dovecot (1.1.15). At the same time, our company's name has changed. The
old mail addresses are forwarded to the new addresses.
But I've a problem with sieve. It looks like the sieve filters are only
working for the new a
Hi,
Wondering if anyone could give some indication as to where to look for the
cause of the following error messages. These error messages seem to occur
at about the time when users are having problems logging in.
Jun 8 10:33:19 host dovecot: auth(default): Master request . not
found
U
On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
Many startup scripts for ntp make a call to ntpdate or an equivalent
to get
the time close on startup, then call ntp to keep the clock synced.
Hmm. I suppose I could change Dovecot master so that if no imap/pop3
processes have been created ye
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
You could of course also apply Apple's multiple-connections-per-
process patch posted to this list some months ago or wait for Snow
Leopard which distributes Dovecot with that patch.
From what I heard today, Snow is only going to support non P
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
Thanks, I have been looking at those adjustments. My concern, is
that if Dovecot uses a process per imap or pop connection, 2048 is
not nearly enough for any significant email system.
Yes, it
Bruce Bodger wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I have been looking at those adjustments. My concern, is
>> that if Dovecot uses a process per imap or pop connection, 2048 is
>> not nearly enough for any significant email system.
>
> There are several parameter
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
Thanks, I have been looking at those adjustments. My concern, is
that if Dovecot uses a process per imap or pop connection, 2048 is
not nearly enough for any significant email system.
Yes, it uses a process per each logged in user. POP3 proce
On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
Thanks, I have been looking at those adjustments. My concern, is
that if Dovecot uses a process per imap or pop connection, 2048 is
not nearly enough for any significant email system.
There are several parameters in dovecot.conf that can be
On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for
clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl
[kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but
can be rais
On Jun 8, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for
clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl
[kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but
can be raised to 2500. I believe the OS uses around 100 or
On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Bodger wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for
clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl
[kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but can
be rais
On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Scott Haneda wrote:
I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for
clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl
[kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but can
be raised to 2500. I believe the OS uses around 100 or
I've temporarily got SELinux set to permissive mode on a fresh install on
CentOS 5. It was blocking Dovecot's access to ~/mail because the files were
labeled file_t. What's the correct way to label these?
I will be deploying Dovecot on OS X shortly. I am looking for
clarification on the limits imposed by OS X and sysctl
[kern.maxproc]. I understand that it is defaulting to 532, but can be
raised to 2500. I believe the OS uses around 100 or so, plus I will
have other processes and shells a
on 6-6-2009 2:45 PM Harlan Stenn spake the following:
> Juergen wrote:
>> Harlan wrote:
>>> There is no corrected version of the real-time clock before the PC goes
>>> online.
>> I'd suggest to read chrony's manual. Chrony stores the reference values
>> collected while running online for further us
on 6-6-2009 11:50 AM Scott Haneda spake the following:
> Sorry for the top post and lack of snipping this email down, I'm using a
> mobile phone.
>
> Can you explain why the system clock gets so far out of time? I
> certainly struggle with crime (time?) drifting even on an always network
> connect
on 6-6-2009 12:52 PM Arno Wald spake the following:
> Pascal Volk wrote:
>> On Debian systems I'm very happy with the OpenBSD NTP daemon.
>> Package: openntpd
>> This ntpd adjusts the local time in little steps.
>
> Also on startup? ntpd uses little steps while running, too. But only at
> startup
--On Monday, June 08, 2009 11:05 AM -0400 Charles Marcus
wrote:
rc5 is the latest... you might wanna try with that first...
Thanks. I'll do that as soon as Rawhide catches up. (If it takes too long,
I'll patch their source RPM to use RC5.)
I'm actually running with a couple patches from M
--On Monday, June 08, 2009 10:09 AM -0700 Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's always only the From line that it doesn't like. Do you really have
"tss at iki.fi" instead of "t...@iki.fi"? That's why it's not working.
It's expecting: From single-word timestamp.
That's what's in the file. It's possible I
For what it's worth, I've been running Dovecot (and a whole slew
of other stuff) on ZFS for about a year now, but under Solaris, not
FreeBSD. Very fast, no stability problems. It's being hit pretty
hard and handles it well. Just FYI.
-Dave
On Jun 8, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Frank B
On Jun 7, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Getting "Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file" on 1.2rc2 after
transferring mail from an ancient 0.99.13 system. The first line of
the file looks ok. Curiously, it's one of my archival folders of
this list. Here's the first header from the top o
It seems to be when reading all the subfolders, hich was very quick in RC4.
I will do your proposal of running strace for further details
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Joan wrote:
Switiching to RC5, there is a visible decrease in performance to
access via IMAP large accou
Hello,
I'm running Dovecot 1.1.13 on FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE and I'm receiving a
large number of errors much like the following:
dovecot: Jun 08 09:27:04 Error: IMAP(x...@x.x): Corrupted index cache file
/nfs/x.x/x/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache: Corrupted physical size for
uid=2284: 5312 != 5217
d
On 6/8/2009, Kenneth Porter (sh...@sewingwitch.com) wrote:
> Getting "Mailbox isn't a valid mbox file" on 1.2rc2
rc5 is the latest... you might wanna try with that first...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Since 7.2 the only "tuning" I have been doing is raising my kmem size so
I can have a larg arc_max.
I've been using 2gb arc_max with 2.8G kmem size. I haven't done any
detailed tests but ZFS loves it's arc.
You should read this http://www.cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=979
Check this
Is anyone running Dovecot on AIX? I'm trying to debug the "Corrupted
index cache file... record points outside file" problem. I can give
gory details about what I've tried, but for now I would just like to
see setups on AIX.
Thanks,
Jonathan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic sig
I have been running AIX, IBM's Unix on IBM hardware for years but am
being forced into Lintel, mostly because of IBM hollowing out support,
moving to a Fortune 500 only customer base and leaving the small shop
increasingly SOL. One of the realities of Lintel is that the hardware
is, compared
Proskurin Kirill schreef:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Proskurin Kirill schreef:
Hello all.
We run it in an test case also, with no problems till now.
We have about 200 mailboxes, not much i know.
We have mailboxes with more than 5 messages, and it all works
well.
No problems after the normal
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Proskurin Kirill schreef:
Hello all.
We run it in an test case also, with no problems till now.
We have about 200 mailboxes, not much i know.
We have mailboxes with more than 5 messages, and it all works well.
No problems after the normal kernel Tuning.
Could you sa
Proskurin Kirill schreef:
Hello all.
We run it in an test case also, with no problems till now.
We have about 200 mailboxes, not much i know.
We have mailboxes with more than 5 messages, and it all works well.
No problems after the normal kernel Tuning.
Could you say what tuning do you us
Hello all.
We run it in an test case also, with no problems till now.
We have about 200 mailboxes, not much i know.
We have mailboxes with more than 5 messages, and it all works well.
No problems after the normal kernel Tuning.
Could you say what tuning do you use and why?
--
Best regards
Frank Bonnet schreef:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
Thanks for the feedback ! I'll plan to run it at 7.2
and of course certainly not on a production server
without numerous tests !
Dino Ming wrote:
Just to let you guys know, I have nightmare with FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
Thanks for the feedback ! I'll plan to run it at 7.2
and of course certainly not on a production server
without numerous tests !
Dino Ming wrote:
> Just to let you guys know, I have nightmare with FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE + ZFS.
> It brought to me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoffroy Desvernay wrote:
> Frank Bonnet a écrit :
>> Hello
>>
>> Anyons has tested this configuration with success ?
>>
>> I'll test it in few days and I am wondering if I am alone :-)
>>
> Not ZFS, but various combinations of dovecot 1.1.15+FreeBSD(7
On Jun 7, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Joan wrote:
Switiching to RC5, there is a visible decrease in performance to
access via IMAP large accounts (>1G) with mutiple mailboxes per
accounts.
In RC4, there was no delay visible by a human when accessing
locally. Now it takes up to 4 or 5 secs.
When
36 matches
Mail list logo
