-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Actually, I once had a system where the request was we do not send over
quota notices, all mails have to arrive. Hence, deliver should have no
quota - well, a
Sure .. but you can break the index files in exactly the same way as
with NFS. :)
That is right :)
For us, all the front end exim servers pass their mail to a single final
delivery server. It was done so that we didn't have all the front end
servers needing to mount the storage. It also
Hello,
thanks for help.
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:26 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
my user_query:
user_query = SELECT home, uid, gid, concat('*:storage=',
quota_bytes,'M')
AS quota_rule FROM mail_users WHERE login = '%u'
Do you really want quota_bytes number of megabytes? If not, change
the
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 11:32 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
best way would be if we could pipe mails from procmail to deliver like
described here:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail
but in this case lda ignores my quota and is putting mails in inbox which is
actual over quota.
is there a way to
On 2010-02-18 4:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over
quota at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message,
*regardless* of whether or not it puts the user over quota.
Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this behavior? One
On 2010-02-19 3:16 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Actually, I once had a system where the request was we do not
send over quota notices, all mails have to arrive. Hence,
deliver should have no quota - well, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
Ahh... so, this would only be a [potential] problem in the case of [a]
user[s] that didn't login for a long time... and I guess you could even
deal with that by some kind of nightly cron job...
A cron
Hello,
Call deliver with -d $USER parameter.
puhh, thanks, i got it now.
lda works + all procmail rules.
one thing is left, but i think this is not possible.
our users have full access to procmailparts. if they use procmailrules to
attach mails on folders it its possible to bypass the
hi...
which are the diference to configure quota plugin when LDA is dovecot:
these setting:
protocol imap {
:
mail_plugins = quota imap_quota
:
}
protocol pop3 {
:
mail_plugins = quota
:
}
.vs.
Hi,
I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve.
I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report
anything that's new in the folders.
What I mean is this :
Postfix get's a mail and hands it over to dovecot's LDA and sieve moves
it to a folder.
When I log in with
http://blog.dovecot.org/
I was thinking that I could blog about:
- ideas for new Dovecot feature designs
- when I actually manage to implement some new great feature
- maybe some stuff about IMAP/email in general
- and maybe whenever I happen to be moving to a different country
I wasn't
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100
Koenraad Lelong dove...@ace-electronics.be wrote:
Hi,
I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve.
I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report
anything that's new in the folders.
What I mean is this :
Postfix get's a mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX and
the currently selected folder are automatically
imap is the only special case, because there you probably want to use
imap_quota. Everything else is just happy with plain quota. Actually you
could even put the regular mail_plugins outside protocol {} and only override
it for imap.
On 19.2.2010, at 16.15, maximatt wrote:
hi...
which are
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX
and the currently selected folder
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100
Koenraad Lelong xxx...@ace-electronics.be wrote:
...
Take a look http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/tips#beh_downloadstartup
Hi Nikita,
Thanks for the link.
What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your
Hi Koenraad,
What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your
message. Now it will be available to harvesters, and I will get spam
via that address very soon. Please don't be offended, but remove
that from your replies.
Not to a wise ass, but by posting to a list, you'll get your
Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
were marked as unread.
This is a Thunderbird bug and
On 19.2.2010, at 17.28, Werner wrote:
Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
were marked as
On 2010-02-19 6:33 AM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the
On 2010-02-19 9:20 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://blog.dovecot.org/
I was thinking that I could blog about:
I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
blogging about. Thanks Timo!
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hello,
I may have missed a point, but I could have found an issue between plugins
quota and lazy_expunge.
I have noticed that the lazy_expunged mails are counted as part of the
quota, while the documentation says it should not be. I have first tried to
find out if this was a configuration
Hi,
I was following the earlier namespaces discussion and I would like to
repost a doubt. I need to have some kind of archiving, it means, store old
messages into a cheap storage. But I couldn´t think any other solution
than symlinks.
Then, I thought about store 'Sent Items' (as having old
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Charles Marcus
cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-02-19 9:20 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://blog.dovecot.org/
I was thinking that I could blog about:
I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
blogging about. Thanks Timo!
On 19.2.2010, at 19.56, Brandon Lamb wrote:
I was thinking that I could blog about:
I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
blogging about. Thanks Timo!
Now where is the Like button to this thread
In the blog itself? ;)
(Apparently I should replace those
We've been struggling with a problem for the past couple of days which to this
point I've only gotten to be able to boil down to this:
1. Install nessus home edition (less pluggins I assume)
2. run all scans (sequentially or in parallel, doesn't seem to matter)
3. about 3 minutes in
Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread, it has been
very educational.
Since my last post, I have had several meetings, including a conference
with Dell storage specialists. I have also gathered some metrics to beat
around.
The EqualLogic units we are looking at are the baseline
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 06:10 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
I certainly wouldn't want to accept a message in this case, user
might be 1K under quota, but get 20m file now that might be a
whoopie doo :) but what if 130K users did same.
Well, I'd argue that if you're allowing messages
Wayne Thursby put forth on 2/19/2010 3:40 PM:
Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread, it has been
very educational.
Since my last post, I have had several meetings, including a conference
with Dell storage specialists. I have also gathered some metrics to beat
around.
Rodolfo Gonzalez put forth on 2/19/2010 5:18 PM:
Hi,
This might be a silly question: which would be
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 called news with inode_ratio = 4096, and after
Hi!
On Fre, 2010-02-19 at 17:18 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
[...]
This might be a silly question: which would be
Not at all IMHO.
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 called news
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If your version of Ubuntu server has XFS support built in, forget ext4 and go
XFS. It's more reliable, faster in every single benchmark I've seen
especially
for large numbers of files, both large and small, has a ton of management
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better than
using EXT4 though, why on earth anyone would use that on a serious
production server I'll never know.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:51 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
If
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:28 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
pop3-login[24451]: segfault at 000c rip 003c7de610a2 rsp
7fff07116968 error 4
I'm having a really hard time getting a core dump
Yeah, it's difficult to get login processes to core dump. In v1.2 it's
easier though.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 05:23 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:28 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
pop3-login[24451]: segfault at 000c rip 003c7de610a2 rsp
7fff07116968 error 4
BTW. I just tried with Nessus, but couldn't reproduce this.
signature.asc
Noel Butler wrote:
Agree wth XFS, providing, and a big providing, you have reliable
and guaranteed power, hard powerouts on XFS are not known for their
niceness and protection of data
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better
than using EXT4 though, why on earth
Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez put forth on 2/20/2010 12:18 AM:
I used to have the maildirs on ReiserFS and never had a problem with it,
but given the current state of that FS and that I weren't really
comfortable with it, I'll give XFS a try for the maildir array and the
postfix queue partition.
37 matches
Mail list logo
