On 3/17/2012 4:24 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Long story but we don't have any control over our mail server which is
handled by the parent company abroad and is on MS Exchange.
To use an IMAP storage solution is the only way to get rid of pesky MS
.pst files which have been causing everyone grief
On 03/18/2012 09:16 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 3/17/2012 4:24 PM, Kaya Saman wrote:
Long story but we don't have any control over our mail server which is
handled by the parent company abroad and is on MS Exchange.
To use an IMAP storage solution is the only way to get rid of pesky MS
.pst
On 18.3.2012, at 0.28, Sven Hartge wrote:
mbox has big problems with concurrent writes, the bigger the mbox is,
the more problems you get. This is mainly caused by the meta-data of a
message (meaning flags, status, etc.) which is stored inside the mbox
file itself. Flagging a message as read
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 18.3.2012, at 0.28, Sven Hartge wrote:
mbox has big problems with concurrent writes, the bigger the mbox is,
the more problems you get. This is mainly caused by the meta-data of
a message (meaning flags, status, etc.) which is stored inside the
mbox file
On 2012-03-18 5:16 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Is your problem with the PST files themselves, or merely the fact
they're stored on the local PC, probably in the users' roaming profiles,
thus creating the problem of large data movement during logon/off?
If so, using
On 2012-03-18 11:15 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Only time when the entire mbox file is rewritten is when you
expunge the first message.
Hmmm... wonder if there would be a way to add some kind of 'dummy' first
message that dovecot would simply ignore (not show to the user), that
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Hmmm... wonder if there would be a way to add some kind of 'dummy'
first message that dovecot would simply ignore (not show to the
user), that would prevent that bevaior?
That's what uw-imap does. It creates a message with the
On 18.3.2012, at 17.36, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-18 11:15 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Only time when the entire mbox file is rewritten is when you
expunge the first message.
Hmmm... wonder if there would be a way to add some kind of 'dummy' first
message that dovecot
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is later
freed in purge step. This is typically done in a nightly cronjob when
there's less disk I/O activity.
What happens if there is filesystem hard quota that is exceeded?
On 18.3.2012, at 23.00, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is
later
freed in purge step. This is typically done in a nightly cronjob when
there's less disk I/O activity.
What
On Sunday 18 of March 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 18.3.2012, at 23.00, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox
Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is
later freed in purge step. This is typically done in a nightly cronjob
On 18.3.2012, at 23.52, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is
later freed in purge step. This is typically done in a nightly cronjob
when there's less disk I/O activity.
What happens if there is filesystem hard quota that is
12 matches
Mail list logo
