> On 12/07/2023 09:33 EEST rixati6186--- via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you very much Mr. Aki for your quick and prompt reply! Got it.
>
> Is my configuration properly aligned for new metrics? Is "service stats"
> block (which I assume it's new one) enough to enable new metrics?
>
> Kin
Thank you very much Mr. Aki for your quick and prompt reply! Got it.
Is my configuration properly aligned for new metrics? Is "service stats" block
(which I assume it's new one) enough to enable new metrics?
Kindest Regards.
Konstantin
___
dovecot mail
> On 12/07/2023 02:53 EEST rixati6186--- via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>
> And if possible, how to disable statistics completely and safely? Without the
> "0" trick, that leads getting;
>
> "Jul 12 02:20:55 mail dovecot: auth: Error:
> net_connect_unix(/var/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: No such
Hello,
To users of argon2id as a password hash, what are best practices/what
do you use to generate the argon2id password hashes? I want to know if
I should do more than:
doveadm pw -s ARGON2ID
Also, for storing an argon2id password hash in a database
(mysql/mariadb in this example) what value(s
On 7/10/23 21:47, Sean Gallagher wrote:
While I am always for security improvements, the utility of this
unclear. I will ABSTAIN from this poll.
Presently, any system administrator who intends to issue must-staple
certificates, faces the dilemma to either chose to
a) Refrain from issuing mus
And if possible, how to disable statistics completely and safely? Without the
"0" trick, that leads getting;
"Jul 12 02:20:55 mail dovecot: auth: Error:
net_connect_unix(/var/dovecot/stats-writer) failed: No such file or directory
Jul 12 02:20:55 mail dovecot: auth: Error: stats: open(old-stats-
Hi.
I'm using Dovecot on OpenBSD OS. "dovecot --version" reports: 2.3.20
(80a5ac675d) and this is my configuration file: https://termbin.com/m4to
How to properly set the statistics for the version I use? I have both "service
stats" and "service old-stats" and it seems I'm not really getting any
Okay, after digging into the source code of mail-crypt-plugin.c and
doveadm-mail-crypt.c, it was clear that doveadm should do the trick.
But it didn't...
Further digging into doveadm-mail-crypt.c lead me to mail-crypt-acl-
plugin.c which revealed that there must be an additional plugin called
mai
On 7/10/2023 11:18 AM, Anthony Carrico wrote:
On 7/9/23 13:19, joe a wrote:
My attempts thus far seem without results.
What should I expect to see, if anything, in each account for a
successful "share"? Sadly, I see no apparent change in the displayed
folder structure using Thunderbird (most
This is the error I get in the dovecot logs when a user tries to access
a shared mailbox encrypted with another user's folder key:
Jul 11 18:45:27 prokyon dovecot:
imap(us...@mydomain.net)<5015>: Error:
Mailbox Shared/us...@mydomain.net/INBOX: UID=2306: read() failed:
read(/home/vmail/mydomain.
Hi all,
I am trying to setup mailbox sharing (not public mailboxes) together
with mail-crypt plugin and encrypted folder keys.
According to the source code of the mail-crypt plugin (there's code
trying to retrieve private keys for shared mailboxes), and its
documentation, this should be possible:
Am Montag, dem 10.07.2023 um 07:52 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
>
>
> Technically you could return a keypair for the public user from
> userdb, when the public user is being looked up.
> mail_crypt_global_public/private_key takes precedence over generated
> keys.
>
> Aki
Thanks. Trie
Sean Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/07/2023 5:33 pm, novoMedia via dovecot wrote:
> > I am not exactly sure what hosts have to do with this. The must-staple
> > extension is a (cryptographically ensured) flag that is 'ingrained'
> > into a certificate. It tells a client to only accept the certificate
On 11/07/2023 6:18 pm, Sean Gallagher wrote:
No confrontation here. I support you with your quest. It's just not
something I think I would ever use or need - so I didn't vote for it.
I also didn't vote against it - it would be nice to have,.
I should clarify. When I say "vote" I mean figurat
On 11/07/2023 5:33 pm, novoMedia via dovecot wrote:
I am not exactly sure what hosts have to do with this. The must-staple
extension is a (cryptographically ensured) flag that is 'ingrained'
into a certificate. It tells a client to only accept the certificate
if a valid and recent OCSP response
Hello Sean,
Thank you for your fast reply.
> or c) use must-staple on a host-by-host basis
I am not exactly sure what hosts have to do with this. The must-staple
extension is a (cryptographically ensured) flag that is 'ingrained' into
a certificate. It tells a client to only accept the cert
16 matches
Mail list logo