Re: Perl5 error in logs

2022-07-11 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 Jul 10, at 03:40, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022-07-07, @lbutlr mailto:krem...@kreme.com>> wrote: >> I am getting a lot of these in the logs: >> >> dovecot[52816] imap: Error: Use of uninitialized value $ENV{"PATH"} in split >> at /usr/

Perl5 error in logs

2022-07-07 Thread @lbutlr
I am getting a lot of these in the logs: dovecot[52816] imap: Error: Use of uninitialized value $ENV{"PATH"} in split at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.36/mach/File/Spec/Unix.pm line 256. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE releng/13.1-n250148-fc952ac2212 GENERIC ===>>> dovecot-2.3.19.1 ===>>>

Re: JMAP Support Status

2022-04-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 Apr 14, at 11:31, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2022-04-14 19:11, Michael Slusarz wrote: >>> On 04/13/2022 2:24 AM David Klingenberg >>> wrote: >>> has there been any development on JMAP support in Dovecot? >> JMAP is not currently being developed. > cyrus-imapd have it But only cyrus,

Dupliate-ish email search?

2022-03-02 Thread @lbutlr
I'm mulling over writing some code to find emails in a maildir that are duplicates, ish. That is to say that sometimes the same message doesn't quite show up as an exact match. Like some ad company may send you three identical messages, except they aren't actually EXACTLY identical, the

Re: dovecot mailing list (this mailing list), DKIM, SPF and DMARC

2022-02-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 Feb 16, at 10:22, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Sebastian Nielsen wrote: >> Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned. >> >> same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few others. > I don't understand at all why banning tld is

Re: Something obvious in my sieve?

2021-08-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Aug 19, at 12:23, @lbutlr wrote: > I get the following error for this: line 24 is the "contains subset" line > .active_sieve: line 24: error: expecting test identifier after ',' in test > list, but found '('. > .active_sieve: line 24: error: expecting '

Something obvious in my sieve?

2021-08-19 Thread @lbutlr
I get the following error for this: line 24 is the "contains subset" line .active_sieve: line 24: error: expecting test identifier after ',' in test list, but found '('. .active_sieve: line 24: error: expecting ',' or end of test list ')', but found '{'. .active_sieve: error: parse failed.

Re: Why do so many dovecot list mails fail dmarc?

2021-08-14 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Aug 13, at 11:11, dove...@ptld.com wrote: > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.ch; > s=protonmail; t=1628873196; > bh=HCYF6+sDiqNN6f9T2srf/HEjnr5eJacuoNxBWXk1XJA=; > h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; This seems

Re: OT somewhat, how to unsubscribe?

2021-07-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Jul 16, at 13:39, Christy S wrote: > It's been a while since I've subscribed and I don't remember how to get off > the mailing list. We've changed how we're handling mail now, so dovecot is no > longer being used. Can anyone help? MOst mailing lists have a blurb at the > bottom with

Re: 2FA/MFA with IMAP & postfix/submission

2021-07-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Jul 15, at 08:52, Alex wrote: > Client certs appears to be a good solution. A solution, certainly. A GOOD solution? Not really. > What's the process for managing them with more than a hundred client accounts? And that's the first issue. The second issue is "my primary device is not

Re: Dovecot book for a newbie

2021-07-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Jul 07, at 16:16, li...@lazygranch.com wrote: > > https://blog.andreev.it/?p=1975 This is quite out of date now, especially as regards setting up TLS. This is a Postfix 2.10 configuration and the current postfix is 3.6. In addition, it is missing configuration for submissions in

Re: Dovecot book for a newbie

2021-07-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Jul 07, at 13:33, Kevin N. wrote: > I've also heard good things about "The Book of Postfix". Even though it is > quite old now, most of the parts/concepts/terminology still apply today. Part > of it is also available on Google Books. Despite being quote oldies you say, this is a great

Re: dsync replication fails with No space left on device / Out of memory

2021-07-07 Thread @lbutlr
On 2021 Jul 05, at 02:00, Steven Varco wrote: > I then increased the filesystem size and all the problems suddenly vanished. How large was your tmp before and after the change, out of curiosity? -- -=> <=-

Dovecot 2.3.15 (was Re: Dovecot 2.3.15 compilation fails)

2021-06-28 Thread @lbutlr
On 27 Jun 2021, at 05:38, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: > Dovecot 2.3.15 On FreeBSD 13.0 I am seeing that my installed version, 2.3.13_1 is the newest dovecot. I've been checking since I have some CVEs on that version, but no update yet. Any timeline for FreeBSD -- 'When you've been a wizard

Re: lda to lmtp

2021-06-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 13 Jun 2021, at 05:17, Benny Pedersen wrote: > i dont reply anymore to you, Best plan. -- 'Never build a dungeon you wouldn't be happy to spend the night in yourself,' said the Patrician (...). 'The world would be a happier place if more people remembered that.' --Guards!

Re: sieve not updating headers?

2021-06-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 11 Jun 2021, at 07:54, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Jun 11, 2021, at 3:51 AM, Vincent Brillault > wrote: >>> It then falls through my personal sieve filter and hits the implicit >>> keep at the end and ends up in my inbox - with the original headers. >> >> I had a similar issue recently (with

Re: Dovecot Stats for Logwatch

2021-06-02 Thread @lbutlr
On 02 Jun 2021, at 02:10, Plutocrat wrote: > Its here if anyone can use it. Any suggestions for improvement welcome. Use > at your own risk etc. > > https://gist.github.com/plutocrat/8a2033923e14670dd13611fc0b51fc0f This looks good. My only comment is the script doesn't account for compressed

Re: Outlook creating IMAP folders even though forbidden by ACLs

2021-05-12 Thread @lbutlr
On 10 May 2021, at 19:31, Matt Grant wrote: > We are using Outlook 2013, 2016 and 2019, You definitely should not be using Outlook 2013. It has serious issues, and does not support modern TLS v1.2/1.3 I am unsure if Outlook 2016 does, but I know 2013 does not. Also, mainstream support for

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Apr 2021, at 13:47, Robert L Mathews wrote: > Because of this, I've changed my company's various email > autoconfigure/autodiscover hints and help pages to recommend configuring > new clients using port 993 for IMAP The is the right choice, though port 993 is IMAPS, not IMAP. I did not

Re: Can the disable_plaintext_auth setting get overridden for a specific port?

2021-04-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Apr 2021, at 11:17, Steve Dondley wrote: > In 10-auth.conf, I have "disable_plaintext_auth = yes" > > For port 143, I'd like to do something like this to override that setting: > > service imap-login { > inet_listener imap { >port = 143 >disable_plain_text_auth = no > } > } Are

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Apr 2021, at 01:20, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Citeren "@lbutlr" : > >> When you enter your email address, it would be TRIVIAL to check the MX >> records for the domain and fill those in for the SMTP and IMAP servers, >> allowing users to more easily

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 29 Apr 2021, at 19:48, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > > > Fact: Exchange (especially hosted) is 2010-ish, Office365 is the buzzword > these days. Microsoft have been trying their best for quite some time now to > cripple the IMAP support in Outlook as much as they can so that the email > users

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-29 Thread @lbutlr
On 29 Apr 2021, at 05:57, Jerry wrote: > It sounds to me like you are setting up Outlook to use port 465. In the > setup screen, set the port to either "25" or "587". I am using "587" > with "starttls" Your "incoming mail port" will depend on how you have > Dovecot configured. I use port "143"

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-29 Thread @lbutlr
On 29 Apr 2021, at 03:22, Steve Dondley wrote: > I am totally unfamiliar with Exchange servers. What do they offer, exactly, > that dovecot/postfix does not (besides a revenue stream for MS)? A monthly stipend to Microsoft? (I think they actuallyy do offer some useful tools for things like

Re: Installation Question: Is a web server required ?

2021-04-29 Thread @lbutlr
On 29 Apr 2021, at 01:23, justina colmena ~biz wrote: > POP3 is the better and more efficient protocol for clients who simply want to > download email messages to their desktop once and for all so they don't need > to keep accessing the server over and over again to read the same old >

Re: What imap ssl/auth settings work best with MS Outlook?

2021-04-28 Thread @lbutlr
On 28 Apr 2021, at 12:49, Steve Dondley wrote: > I repeatedly have a hell of a time getting clients' Outlook software working > well with Dovecot. It's hard for me to test myself since I don't have Outlook > and it would be impossible to keep up with all the different versions anyway. How old

Re: Installation Question: Is a web server required ?

2021-04-28 Thread @lbutlr
On 28 Apr 2021, at 11:28, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS] wrote: > only be accessed by POP3(s)/IMAP(s There is no reason to support POP3 on a new mail service. IMAP is suppserior in every way, both for the user and for the server. (There is nothing that POP3 can do that IMAP cannot

Re: failed: Cached message size smaller than expected

2021-04-24 Thread @lbutlr
On 23 Apr 2021, at 08:52, Hauke Fath wrote: > There are longstanding problems with Dovecot mbox indexing. … > Would be great if this could be sorted out. It can be, simply stop using nbox. -- Help me, Obi-wan Kenobi. You're my only hope.

Re: failed: Cached message size smaller than expected

2021-04-21 Thread @lbutlr
On 21 Apr 2021, at 11:31, Michael Grant wrote: We don't really fix issues with mbox files anymore, other than read issues.. Our focus is enabling people to move to other formats, such as maildir. I would strongly recommend you to consider using maildir instead of mbox. > >

Re: Letsencrypt/OpenSSL test - Verify return code: 21

2021-04-10 Thread @lbutlr
On 10 Apr 2021, at 12:57, Juri Haberland wrote: > On 10/04/2021 19:52, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 10 Apr 2021, at 09:55, B Shea wrote: >>> OpenSSL (Ubuntu default/repo version): 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020 >> >> There have been a few critical patches to open SSL in the l

Re: Letsencrypt/OpenSSL test - Verify return code: 21

2021-04-10 Thread @lbutlr
On 10 Apr 2021, at 09:55, B Shea wrote: > OpenSSL (Ubuntu default/repo version): 1.1.1f 31 Mar 2020 There have been a few critical patches to open SSL in the last year, including a very important one to 1.1.1k just recently. Not to do with your issue, but I suspect updating both openssl and

Re: How to prevent, or change priority, of dovecot's FAILed relay-submission to relay's IPv6 address, and submit ONLY/first to IPv4?

2021-04-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Apr 2021, at 13:06, PGNet Dev wrote: >> then the software is entirely correct in deciding to use any of those >> addresses in whatever order it wants. > > Complete and utter malarkey. Ah, well, I suggest you write your own patch and implement it then, since you have no interest in any

Re: How to prevent, or change priority, of dovecot's FAILed relay-submission to relay's IPv6 address, and submit ONLY/first to IPv4?

2021-04-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Apr 2021, at 08:29, PGNet Dev wrote: > >>> And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all >>> services on it will be. >> If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it should provides >> services on both. > > Says who/what? > > There is no

Re: How to prevent, or change priority, of dovecot's FAILed relay-submission to relay's IPv6 address, and submit ONLY/first to IPv4?

2021-04-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Apr 2021, at 07:57, Arjen de Korte wrote: > Citeren PGNet Dev : >> And it's a bad assumption that since the host is dual-stack that all >> services on it will be. > I fail to see why. If a hostname resolves to both an A and record, it > should provides services on both. Yes, that

Re: How to prevent, or change priority, of dovecot's FAILed relay-submission to relay's IPv6 address, and submit ONLY/first to IPv4?

2021-04-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 Apr 2021, at 06:08, PGNet Dev wrote: > whereas other services listen at both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, with IPv6 > preferred over IPv4, postfix listens ONLY on IPv4, Do you mean that YOUR postfix only listens to ipv4? If so, wouldn't the solution be to setup postfix to listen to ipv6?

Re: Avoid duplicate emails in the sent folder

2021-04-04 Thread @lbutlr
On 04 Apr 2021, at 06:39, André Rodier wrote: > I continue to search on a simple solution, and I will come back to you! Seems the best solution is to get a web client that properly puts messages into DRAFTS and not appends them to Sent, but I guess that is too much to hope for? I'd certainly

Re: dsync error: Can't sync mailbox tmp: Mailbox isn't selectable

2021-03-27 Thread @lbutlr
On 26 Mar 2021, at 05:44, Hagen Bauer wrote: > dsync(username2): Error: Can't sync mailbox tmp: Mailbox isn't selectable Permissions seems obvious, but since tmp is a folder used by Maildir and you are creating the maildir… Maybe the user already has a mailbox named tmp and that is causing

Re: JMAP support?

2021-03-08 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 Mar 2021, at 14:04, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: > Em 08/03/2021 16:43, @lbutlr escreveu: >> On 08 Mar 2021, at 02:15, Mark Constable wrote: >> There doesn't seem to be much interest in JMAP ou there, which means it is >> going to be pretty hard to get something working

Re: JMAP support?

2021-03-08 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 Mar 2021, at 02:15, Mark Constable wrote: > On 8/3/21 18:08, @lbutlr wrote: >>> Two years on so what is the status of JMAP support in Dovecot now? >> I don't think anything has changed on this front. Last I saw, only Cyrus has >> partial support for JMAP mail,

Re: JMAP support?

2021-03-08 Thread @lbutlr
On 08 Mar 2021, at 00:11, Mark Constable wrote: > On Fri Jan 25 2019 Aki wrote: > > There is no JMAP support in any dovecot version yet. > > Two years on so what is the status of JMAP support in Dovecot now? I don't think anything has changed on this front. Last I saw, only Cyrus has partial

Re: Why Last-login?

2021-03-03 Thread @lbutlr
On 03 Mar 2021, at 05:38, Aki Tuomi wrote: > These days you can also replace last-login with mail-lua script, which can do > lot more than just try to set a dict. But last-login rather useful > information when you are debugging, or removing dormant accounts. And other > customer support

Re: Why Last-login?

2021-03-03 Thread @lbutlr
On 03 Mar 2021, at 05:33, Yassine Chaouche wrote: >> Am I missing some reason I would need/want to keep track of that specific >> login time separately? > What about mbox files ? Is anyone foolish enough to use mbox in 2021? It's designed for dozens of kilobytes of mail. Perhaps hundreds of

Re: t/s expired cert error

2021-03-03 Thread @lbutlr
On 03 Mar 2021, at 02:13, Yassine Chaouche wrote: > Le 3/2/21 à 9:02 PM, Matthias Kneer a écrit : >> echo | openssl s_client -connect emu.sbt.net.au:110 -starttls pop3 >> 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -enddate > I am intrigued about the function of echo in that command line ? Did you try

Why Last-login?

2021-03-03 Thread @lbutlr
I've noticed several threads over the last year or so about last-login, and I was curious WHY people care about tracking this in the database. I can see wanting to know if a user has logged in recently, but this seems quite easy to tell by simply looking at the time stamp and/or contents of the

Re: Can Dovecot honor Outlook's "leave mail on server for X days" setting?

2021-03-03 Thread @lbutlr
On 03 Mar 2021, at 00:19, Joseph Tam wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, Steve Dondley wrote: >> I've got a linux box running dovecot/postfix using maildir format. I >> was surprised to learn that a client that had many GBs of email was >> running POP3, not IMAP. It turns out they had a setting to

Re: BUG report

2021-02-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 21 Feb 2021, at 06:19, Oleg Pyzin wrote: > I've compiled Dovecot on a macmini G4 PPC from ports, What OS version are you running on it? -- "Are you pondering what I'm pondering?" "I think so, Brain. But does 'Chunk o' Cheesy's' deliver packing material?"

Re: Sieve by the addressee

2021-02-20 Thread @lbutlr
> On 20 Feb 2021, at 11:02, Shawn Heisey wrote: > > On 2/20/2021 8:50 AM, Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> I consider it a better idea to filter mailing list messages by their >> List-ID header. > > I agree with Markus. It's what I do. This works well: > > if header :regex "list-id"

Re: Mail.app namespaces

2021-02-14 Thread @lbutlr
On 14 Feb 2021, at 01:21, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > To answer my own question here, I added the following namespace: > > namespace { > separator = / > prefix = partial/ > location = mbox:~%u/.partial-mail/ > list = yes > hidden = no > } > > And then, in my home directory, created a

Re: Problem enabling the mail_log plugin

2021-02-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Feb 2021, at 11:34, Mike Quigley wrote: > So it looks like when Roundcube copies them to Trash and expunges the > original, it doesn't set the Trash flag on the message. Checking on my server none of the messages in the Trash maildir have a T flag, they all end in things like :2,hk or

Re: Getting panic in http-client-request.c: line 1240 during indexing on Ubuntu 20.04

2021-02-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 07 Feb 2021, at 17:32, John Fawcett wrote: > On 07/02/2021 20:15, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 07 Feb 2021, at 02:07, @lbutlr wrote: >>> On 06 Feb 2021, at 11:06, John Fawcett wrote: >>>> 19.08.20 >>> Is that a malformed ISO date 2019-08-20 or a truncated eur

Re: Getting panic in http-client-request.c: line 1240 during indexing on Ubuntu 20.04

2021-02-07 Thread @lbutlr
On 07 Feb 2021, at 02:07, @lbutlr wrote: > On 06 Feb 2021, at 11:06, John Fawcett wrote: >> 19.08.20 > > Is that a malformed ISO date 2019-08-20 or a truncated europeans style > 19-08-2020? Either way, I cannot find the message in my dovecot folder. Closest I can

Re: Getting panic in http-client-request.c: line 1240 during indexing on Ubuntu 20.04

2021-02-07 Thread @lbutlr
On 06 Feb 2021, at 11:06, John Fawcett wrote: > 19.08.20 Is that a malformed ISO date 2019-08-20 or a truncated europeans style 19-08-2020? -- 'Yes, but humans are more important than animals,' said Brutha. 'This is a point of view often expressed by humans,' said Om. (Small

Re: logging verbosity

2021-02-05 Thread @lbutlr
On 04 Feb 2021, at 23:11, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote: > > On 2021-02-05 06:00, Jeff Abrahamson wrote: >> On 05/02/2021 05:17, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I definitely want to keep logging unsuccessful auth, but how can I >>> suppress the verbose rest? >>> >>>

Re: Service unavailable, lots of idle dovecot-login processes

2021-02-03 Thread @lbutlr
On 02 Feb 2021, at 05:59, Wolfgang wrote: > hen listing TCP connections via lsof, there are only around 30 > connections open to IMAP and we have exactly the same amount of > dovecot/imap processes. These connections are held by 30 > dovecot/imap-login processes. > > The other 70

Re: Unknown euid and egid, wrong mail directory

2021-02-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Jan 2021, at 13:51, Michael Agbaglo wrote: > "euid=1001() egid=1001()" 1001 doesn't not exist in > /etc/passwd - Where does it come from? Is there a userid 1001 in /etc/passwd? -- Sam, I thought I told you never to play--

Re: Dovecot and mutt

2021-01-25 Thread @lbutlr
On 25 Jan 2021, at 02:08, Rupert Gallagher wrote: > It would be useful to automatically de-HTML e-mails, but this is not a task > for dovecot. Even more useful would be to deprecate HTML in e-mails. Well, that is never going to happen. I have tried, but failed,. To write a sieve and script to

Re: Massive /tmp files

2021-01-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Jan 2021, at 11:29, Ron Garret wrote: > So then my next question is (and I’m not intending to challenge you here, I’m > just trying to get a better understanding of how dovecot works under the > hood): where would these hard links come from? What does dovecot use hard > links for? I

Re: Massive /tmp files

2021-01-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Jan 2021, at 09:07, Ron Garret (gmail) wrote: > On Jan 22, 2021, at 8:02 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > >> On 21 Jan 2021, at 18:08, MRob wrote: >>> Hello, >>> I just found user who has single folder (standard maildir format) that >>> filled with over 8mil f

Re: Massive /tmp files

2021-01-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 21 Jan 2021, at 18:08, MRob wrote: > Hello, > I just found user who has single folder (standard maildir format) that filled > with over 8mil files and 800GB in the /tmp subdirectory of that folder: Are they real files or hard links? I've had some issues (in the past) with thousands of links

Re: Deliver to different namespace with address detail

2021-01-21 Thread @lbutlr
On 21 Jan 2021, at 04:37, Tobia Grosselle [ Terralink ] wrote: > Dovecot 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b) > > namespace { > > list = yes > type = private > inbox = yes > prefix = INBOX/ > separator = / > > } > > namespace Archive { > > list = yes > type = private >

Re: Sieve fileinto :create is failing

2021-01-21 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Jan 2021, at 13:12, Ron Garret wrote: > 1. Is there any documentation about what “requires” are needed to access > various features? The only source I’ve found for this is reverse-engineering > examples. This list an the RFCs. > 2. Is there a way to change the location of the sieve

Re: Dovecot and mutt

2021-01-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Jan 2021, at 07:20, Erwan David wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 01:58:38PM CET, "@lbutlr" said: >> On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >>>> set imap_pass = "lasH-hd

Re: Dovecot and mutt

2021-01-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Jan 2021, at 04:33, Piotr Auksztulewicz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 04:27:11AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: >> set imap_pass = "lasH-hds[er$asd" # Not a real password > > Use single quotes around the password. Double quotes make $asd to be > interpreted as

Dovecot and mutt

2021-01-20 Thread @lbutlr
I have a user who is unable to use mutt to login. I tested and sent a muttrc that worked for me and all he needed to do was put in his username and password. Which failed. After some back and forth, I figured out that his password contains a '$' and a '[' in it, and it seems like one of, or

Re: Obtaining the IMAP GUID from a sieve script

2021-01-18 Thread @lbutlr
On 18 Jan 2021, at 04:12, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 16.01.21 07:42, Ron Garret wrote: >> Because not every email has one. RFC5322 doesn’t require them. >> >> On Jan 15, 2021, at 6:30 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>> Why not simply use the message-id? > (Also, you

Re: Obtaining the IMAP GUID from a sieve script

2021-01-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 15 Jan 2021, at 23:42, Ron Garret wrote: > Because not every email has one. RFC5322 doesn’t require them. And yet, I can tell you exactly how many messages on my mail server do not have a message-ID. Zero. -- 'I'm a raven, aren't I?' it said. 'One of the few birds who speak. The

Re: The use of %w in password_query leads to "Failed to expand plugin setting" error

2021-01-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Jan 2021, at 01:19, f...@fili.nl wrote: > No :) I'm converting the password scheme at the moment of login, please read > the link https://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/ConvertPasswordSchemes for more info. Yes, I did that a while ago, but you said "When the user has % in their password" which

Re: Obtaining the IMAP GUID from a sieve script

2021-01-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 15 Jan 2021, at 10:57, Ron Garret wrote: > Is there any way to obtain the IMAP GUiD of a message that is being processed > by a sieve script? I’m writing a filter that needs to to keep track of > message identities as they are moved around between folders. I could add my > own id header,

Re: The use of %w in password_query leads to "Failed to expand plugin setting" error

2021-01-15 Thread @lbutlr
On 14 Jan 2021, at 08:30, Filidor Wiese wrote: > When a user has a % sign in their password, the following error occurs: Were you storing PLAIN TEXT passwords? -- Some humans would do anything to see if it was possible to do it. If you put a large switch in some cave somewhere, with a

Re: Where is dovemon

2021-01-13 Thread @lbutlr
On 13 Jan 2021, at 04:30, li...@mlserv.org wrote: > https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/dovemon/ Which says it is a tool for dovecot director. Are you using dovecot director?

Re: TLS problem with iOS 9 Mail clients

2021-01-01 Thread @lbutlr
> On 01 Jan 2021, at 17:57, @lbutlr wrote: Apologies, my Internet connection seems to have died for about an hour and the message sent out several times when it started to come back up. -- Footnote on the High Energy Magic building: It was here that the thaum, hitherto belie

Re: TLS problem with iOS 9 Mail clients

2021-01-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 01 Jan 2021, at 16:01, Maik Musall wrote: > recently I migrated my mail server from an Ubuntu 16.04 box to an Ubuntu > 20.04 box, so from dovecot 2.2.22 to 2.3.7.2, and to openssl 1.1.1.f. While > everything else works fine, I have one important user stuck on an iOS 9 > device that I need

Re: TLS problem with iOS 9 Mail clients

2021-01-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 01 Jan 2021, at 16:01, Maik Musall wrote: > recently I migrated my mail server from an Ubuntu 16.04 box to an Ubuntu > 20.04 box, so from dovecot 2.2.22 to 2.3.7.2, and to openssl 1.1.1.f. While > everything else works fine, I have one important user stuck on an iOS 9 > device that I need

Re: TLS problem with iOS 9 Mail clients

2021-01-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 01 Jan 2021, at 16:01, Maik Musall wrote: > recently I migrated my mail server from an Ubuntu 16.04 box to an Ubuntu > 20.04 box, so from dovecot 2.2.22 to 2.3.7.2, and to openssl 1.1.1.f. While > everything else works fine, I have one important user stuck on an iOS 9 > device that I need

Re: TLS problem with iOS 9 Mail clients

2021-01-01 Thread @lbutlr
On 01 Jan 2021, at 16:01, Maik Musall wrote: > recently I migrated my mail server from an Ubuntu 16.04 box to an Ubuntu > 20.04 box, so from dovecot 2.2.22 to 2.3.7.2, and to openssl 1.1.1.f. While > everything else works fine, I have one important user stuck on an iOS 9 > device that I need

Re: Using dovecot with RoundCubeMail - where is the information for new mail in (blue coloured) directories?

2020-12-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Dec 2020, at 04:05, Philip Rhoades wrote: > I guess that is what it seems to look like to me as well - but what does that > mean for what I am trying to do? - ie reset the blue folder highlight > arbitrarily? Sound like the Roundcube style choices are outside th purview of dovecot. --

Re: Using dovecot with RoundCubeMail - where is the information for new mail in (blue coloured) directories?

2020-12-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 18 Dec 2020, at 22:19, Philip Rhoades wrote: > I want to create a script or find out some way of marking a folder blue > according to the datestamp of the most recent mail in the folder. Might be a question more for the Roundcube list, but I think the blue depends on messages being in the

Re: Using dovecot with RoundCubeMail - where is the information for new mail in (blue coloured) directories?

2020-12-18 Thread @lbutlr
On 17 Dec 2020, at 11:42, Aleksander Machniak wrote: > We do not use the RECENT flag because it was not reliable (according to some > comments in code). That is odd, as my MUA has no trouble with knowing which folders contain unread messages and how many unread messages each folder contains.

Re: Outlook with Dovecot

2020-12-12 Thread @lbutlr
On 12 Dec 2020, at 09:20, Elise wrote: > dovecot-2.3.11.3_1 > > Hi group, I have a problem with connecting Outlook 2019 client to my server > (BSD 21.2). Are you sure it is Outlook 2019 and not 2010 2013 or 2016? (Since other clients can connect via TLS, this is going to be an Outlook

Re: Sieve body test

2020-11-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Nov 2020, at 14:45, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 27/10/2020 15:30, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 26 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>> On 23/10/2020 13:22, @lbutlr wrote: >>>> On 22 Oct 2020, at 19:09, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>>>> You need t

Re: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-31 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 14:41, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > Perhaps try the script beforehand in a terminal: I have. And I use | as delimiters all the time. > snip > {2}sed -e '|x|y|' > sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `|' > snip > So no, it's not. Yes it is. As

Re: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 12:34, @lbutlr wrote: > I am not sure about the $1. I think filter just pipes the message (or part of > the message. > > I will see what happens without the echo I suppose. > > Nope, still the same. > > 32: starting `:contains' match with `i;a

Re: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:57, Aki Tuomi wrote: > But I think the sed here is missing 's' from start, so this does not actually > do anything... Copy/paste/edit error. The s is there in the file. darkmode.sh: #!/bin/sh echo $1 | sed -e 's||* {color:white !important; background-color: black

Re: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:25, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On 30/10/2020 17:11, @lbutlr wrote: > [...] >> echo $1 | sed -e '||* {color:white !important; >> background-color: black !important; } |' > > What should the sed stuff do? Changes to * {color:white !important;

Re: Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:26, PGNet Dev wrote: > wrong, or different, I can't say. if helpful, for my script executions, I > successfully do > > require ["vnd.dovecot.pipe", "vnd.dovecot.filter", > "vnd.dovecot.execute", "copy", "environment", "variables", > "vnd.dovecot.debug",

Sieve filter script EXECUTION FAILED

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
So, I have the sieve working up to the point that it calls the script, and the script is called (I get different errors if the script is not there, for example). filter action execute program `darkmode.sh' [[EXECUTION ABORTED]] There's no other error logged (for example, when I had

Re: Sieve matching the raw body

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
On 30 Oct 2020, at 07:27, @lbutlr wrote: > I have tried the following to match the string '' in the body of an > email: > > if body :raw :contains "" { > if body :content "text/html" :contains "" { > if body :contains ""

Sieve matching the raw body

2020-10-30 Thread @lbutlr
I have tried the following to match the string '' in the body of an email: if body :raw :contains "" { if body :content "text/html" :contains "" { if body :contains "" { All three result in matching value `' with key `' => 0 finishing match with result: not matched RFC 5173

Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server

2020-10-28 Thread @lbutlr
On 27 Oct 2020, at 19:38, lists wrote: > And which email clients can do this? Microsoft Outlook and Mail (Windows 10 and iOS) and Apple Mail in macOS and iOS and iPadOS, at least. > A defacto standard needs to be adopted. If I don't provide SPF or DKIM, I am > likely to be deemed spammy,

Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server

2020-10-27 Thread @lbutlr
> On 26 Oct 2020, at 09:11, R. Diez wrote: > >>> >>> I would not advice any company that is continuously being fined for >>> breaking the law. > >> This is not only an overstatement, it is completely irrelevant. Given the >> OP problem >> statement (small business, part-time admin,

Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server

2020-10-27 Thread @lbutlr
On 25 Oct 2020, at 22:51, Sebastian Nielsen wrote: >>> why not just point them at a hosting service like google apps, and let >> google keep things up to date? > > Costs money, Yes. That is a *good* thing. Running an unmaintained mail server is a BAD thing. > and also the problem is that gmail

Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server

2020-10-27 Thread @lbutlr
On 25 Oct 2020, at 22:47, Sebastian Nielsen wrote: > The second way, is to not have webmail at all, but instead have a > authentication gateway in browser, where you must auth with 2FA and captcha. > The only purpose of this gateway, is to authenticate users with 2FA before > their IP is

Re: Sieve body test

2020-10-27 Thread @lbutlr
On 26 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 23/10/2020 13:22, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 22 Oct 2020, at 19:09, Stephan Bosch wrote: >>> You need to include the extprograms plugin: >> I have, and vnf.dovecot.pipe doesn't give the error. >> >&g

dovecot.lda-dupes

2020-10-24 Thread @lbutlr
What is the purpose and/or use of the dovecot.lda-dupes file that (sometimes) exists in the home folder for each user? I've seen some posts about issues with the file or losing track of the location, etc, but nothing on what the file actually does or how it could be useful. I assume it is just

Re: Sieve_before

2020-10-23 Thread @lbutlr
On 23 Oct 2020, at 05:20, @lbutlr wrote: >> Like I said, I’m not 100% sure, but I suspect if you add * to the end: >> if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*.*"] { > Thanks for the advice, I will definitely give that a go, Excellent! That was the

Re: Sieve body test

2020-10-23 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Oct 2020, at 19:09, Stephan Bosch wrote: > You need to include the extprograms plugin: I have, and vnf.dovecot.pipe doesn't give the error. sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve sieve_extprograms ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I am not using filter now though, so I haven't try to track down what the issue is.

Re: Sieve_before

2020-10-23 Thread @lbutlr
> On 22 Oct 2020, at 18:22, Sean Kamath wrote: > > > >> On Oct 22, 2020, at 15:58, @lbutlr wrote: >> >> On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:46, @lbutlr wrote: >>> And it doesn't explain why "if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*.&

Re: Sieve_before

2020-10-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:46, @lbutlr wrote: > And it doesn't explain why "if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] {" also > failed to match despite also showing the email address. > >> “krem...@kreme.com” does not have a :detail part >&g

Re: Sieve_before

2020-10-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Oct 2020, at 15:10, Sean Kamath wrote: > On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:19, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr wrote: >>> if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] { >> if envelope :matches :detail "to" "*&

Re: Sieve_before

2020-10-22 Thread @lbutlr
On 22 Oct 2020, at 10:05, @lbutlr wrote: > require ["variables", "copy"]; > > if address :matches ["To", "Cc"] ["*@*."] { > redirect :copy "backup+295.${1}.${2}@*example.com*"; > } I have tried this with similar

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >