Please post your solution.
Sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and typos
> On Oct 20, 2022, at 10:21 PM, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Oct 21, 2022, at 4:19 AM, Antonio Leding wrote:
>>
>> My understanding is that Director is targeted toward large enterprise mail
>>
The reason to support POP3 is that if you forward email to another
account and that includes any spam, you are gonna get dinged. If folks
want to read their email from gmail, they really need to suck that email
over via POP to avoid this problem.
H
On 3/1/2022 3:13 PM, Peter wrote:
The only
Inodes? df -i
On 7/1/2021 5:07 PM, Steven Varco wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Since I configured dsync replication I get strange errors in the maillog on
> my two mail dovecot nodes:
>
> PRIMARY:
> Jul 2 01:21:42 mx01.example.com dovecot: doveadm: Error:
> read(mx02.example.com) failed:
Robert,
First, thanks!
Second, I'm not a committer on the dovecot project. But I've written a lot of
software where if an end user has a problem and either they want to know why or
if they report it and ask for help, I've found it is MUCH better to have enough
info in the message given to the
On 8/16/16 1:24 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully this is the right channel for such a patch. I have a minor
> enhancement to submit for the antispam plugin
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-antispam-plugin
>
> It adds minimal error checking for the sendmail_binary, otherwise the
isn't designed for what you seem to be doing.
--
Harlan Stenn
http://nwtime.org - Be a member!
On 5/22/14 4:30 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
ntpdate is really only any good being run once (at boot), for example if
you have a clock that can't keep time while the system is off.
I'm not aware of any cases where one needs to run ntpdate at startup
before running ntpd, because one can run 'ntpd -g'
If you're hosting this on the domain where the users will have email,
then do you have a good reason for wanting to use virtual stuff? If
not, use system users.
If you are hosting for another domain (or plan to) I don't have enough
info to tell you more - I routinely set up virtual domains (I
Ralf wrote:
stop dovecot postfix
ntpdate timeserver
start dovecot postfix
start ntpd
Speaking as st...@ntp.org, I recommend:
- run 'ntpd -gN' as early as possible in the startup sequence (no need
for ntpdate)
then as late as possible in the startup sequence, run:
- ntp-wait -v -s 1 ;
I have not tried this:
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/users/7239-any-way-add-message-filters-command-line.html
H
On 5/10/2011 8:50 AM, Ed W wrote:
So, in practice it's fairly irrelevant to be hooked to a stratum 1 for
most purposes ...
Actually, an excellent argument can be made for hooking up to some S2
servers instead of S1 servers..
H
Per wrote:
Sure, I meant 'ntpd -q'.
What benefit do you see in running something to set the time and exit
before starting ntpd instead of just starting ntpd with -g?
H
Per wrote:
Luigi Rosa wrote:
Harlan Stenn said the following on 08/05/11 21:58:
- Start ntd as early as possible
- - ntpd -g ... is better than ntpdate ... ; ntpd ...
- Wait before starting time-sensitive services
- - As last as possible in the boot sequence, run 'ntp-wait -v
Spyros wrote
OK,
So what you people say is :
1. Run ntpdate during startup only once
2. After that, keep time with ntpd
Right ?
https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/StartingNTP4 says:
- Start ntd as early as possible
- - ntpd -g ... is better than ntpdate ... ; ntpd ...
- Wait
Forum. We need the support.
--
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org
http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member!
I may have missed something - if this is NFS related, you are running
NTP on *all* of your machines (clients and servers) that are involved in
this NFS share, right?
NFS cares that the time is sync'd on the computers it works with.
H
Ralf,
Are you using tcsh?
H
* Harlan Stenn harlan.st...@pfcs.com:
Ralf,
Are you using tcsh?
No.
I didn't think you were, but I wanted to ask, as I remember some
versions of tcsh have a non-huge buffer for something (which, now that
I think about it, was either command-line length or an environment
buffer).
H
Figure out exactly what script is running and see if it says why it
would return with a status of 9. If that is because of a SIGKILL, it is
because some process is sending that signal. You are gonna get to
figure out what debug knobs to crank to figure out why this is going on.
Can you invoke
Hey Greg,
I picked up the right-size screwdrivers (P00, T6, T8) today. Still need
to find a spudger, but I think I can use my fingernails until then.
How critical is antistatic for disassembly checking out the fan motors?
H
I would have preferred this be a private reply but I like to honor the
sender's request re Reply-To:.
I have a slight preference for keeping the [Dovecot] prefix in the
Subject: header, as it makes it really obvious to me where a message in
my inbox comes from. I have never liked to pre-sort
It is probably a good idea to figure out the underlying problem instead
of ignoring it.
I use the following patch...
H
patch-dspam-exec.c
Description: Binary data
Note that according to dspam-exec.c, and info sent to stderr by dspam is
treated by the antispam plugin as a fatal error.
All my patch does is to provide enough information to see what the
problem is.
H
Backward time steps can cause real problems for Maildir, as its
uniqueness algorithms can be ... theoretically correct.
H
NTP comes with a script, ntp-wait, that is specifically designed to be
used during the boot-sequence for the purpose of waiting until the clock
is sync'd before starting time-sensitive applications.
See http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/StartingNTP4 for more
information.
BCP is:
- Start
Timo wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Eugene wrote:
But really, all this leads is that admin has to detect the dovecot
termination and simply go and restart it manually -- after some bad
thoughts.
Or the admin actually permanently fixes the time.
This is usually a startup issue
Eugene wrote:
In most cases we talk about, it can't be fixed permanently because this
happens after (cold or warm) system restart, when ntpd can take up to 15
minutes (and in most cases about 3-5 minutes) to actually resync the time.
If you have a good drift file and use iburst (as discussed
Have you seen http://support.ntp.org/Support ?
You said your clock is running fast, so it's not a clock interrupt
issue.
If your OS supports it, and you have a *steady* problem with your clock,
you might be able to correct this problem with the tickadj program and
then ntpd should be able to
Pascal Volk wrote:
On Debian systems I'm very happy with the OpenBSD NTP daemon.
Package: openntpd
This ntpd adjusts the local time in little steps.
The last I checked openntpd was an SNTP implementation, not NTP.
If it works for you, great.
H
Juergen wrote:
How will chrony help here if the PC is not online at boot time?
From http://chrony.sunsite.dk/guide/chrony.html
- chronyd can perform usefully in an environment where access to the time
reference is intermittent. chronyd estimates both the current time
offset and the
Juergen wrote:
Harlan wrote:
There is no corrected version of the real-time clock before the PC goes
online.
I'd suggest to read chrony's manual. Chrony stores the reference values
collected while running online for further use after reboot, even if we
have no online connection at that
Why not just run ntpd and be done with it, ensure you start ntpd with
-g option
It's more than this. ntpd should be started ASAP in the boot process,
and then as late as possible in the boot process one should run
ntp-wait. Only after ntp-wait finishes should time-critical services be
Rob wrote:
Is this related to the leap second that occured yesterday?
There was no leap second in February.
H
Jehan wrote:
... Apparently the ml is not very well configured because a reply
does not reply to the whole ml, but to the single sender. I will take
care now.
I bet there are a *lot* of people (me included) who think the ml is very
well configured precisely because it does not set Reply-to:
The antispam plugn has, IMO, suboptimal logging. I had problems with it
too. I have patches for it that helped me debug the situation, and I'll
be submitting them to the FreeBSD ports maintainer as I didn't get any
response when I emailed the antispam plugin author.
H
I got it working.
Here are the problems I fixed, and it would have been *lots* easier if
the dovecot antispam plugin had better error/debug logging.
Johannes, I can work on a patch for the following if you prefer, and I'd
much rather spend my time getting ntp-4.2.6 out the door.
Getting this
I'm trying to use the dovecot antispam plugin with dspam.
I'm running dovecot 1.1.2.
Using thunderbird and IMAP, when I drag a spam message from the inbox
into the SPAM folder, I get a popup saying The current command did not
succeed. The mail server responded: antispam signature not found.
37 matches
Mail list logo
