Re: Which DKIM application for postfix 3.9.0

Talking about completeness, you can also use rspamd (https://www.rspamd.com ). While it it design to to more than DKIM, it can be use for it. I have an internal mailer relay based on postfix and rspamd that works great. > Le 24 avr. 2024 à 09:40, infoomatic via dovecot

Re: The future of SIS

> Le 18 oct. 2023 à 09:35, Marc a écrit : > >> Dovecot has this option to store attachments separately not? So I am >> not sure this is then still a problem. >> >> >> >> Interesting. How do you tell dovecot to do that ? >> > > I thought I read about something like this, > >

Re: The future of SIS

Le 17 oct. 2023 à 16:34, Marc a écrit : The problem is a bit what everyone understands as s3. I associate this indeed also with an http endpoint on object storage. But the ceph plugin skips this http and talks directly to object store. I don't think you

Re: The future of SIS

Le 17 oct. 2023 à 13:12, Marc a écrit : Is s3 not to slow for this? I think the clue is in the name "s3- compatible". Clearly calling out to "real" (AWS) S3 would be a non-starter.

Re: The future of SIS

> Le 16 oct. 2023 à 15:51, Marc a écrit : > >>> Hello to everyone! >>> Ooops, we are using SIS, guess the solution for a similar optimization >> will be >>> a native deduplicated filesystem. >> >> did you really mean deduplicated or distributed? >> > > I think this duduplicating. Storage

Re: The end of Dovecot Director?

If the community has enough resources to fork the whole project, it would probably be far more efficient and easier to just fork the Director component. I’m not familiar enough with dovecot sources to tell if this is possible, but if the community really wants to keep Director alive, maybe it

Re: adding caldav/carddav next to dovecot

> Début du message réexpédié : > > De: Tanstaafl > Objet: Rép. : adding caldav/carddav next to dovecot > Date: 15 octobre 2022 à 16:11:43 UTC+2 > À: infoomatic , dovecot@dovecot.org > > A HUGE second for SOGo > > We used it for many years in a Gentoo/Dovecot/Postfix environment. > > It was

Re: how to setup IMAPs with letsencrypt

> Le 22 avr. 2022 à 01:50, Jeremy Ardley a écrit : > > > > On 22/4/22 7:44 am, al...@coakmail.com wrote: >>> On 22/4/22 7:25 am, al...@coakmail.com wrote: >>> >> Thanks. I will give a try. >> after enabling SSL, can I disable port 143

Re: disable pop3 ports?

Not sure what distribution you are using, but some distributions provide distincts package for dovecot-pop, so removing it may be enough. This package main purpose it to install a file in /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/ which is then imported in the config by a line like "!include_try

Re: systemd timeout on startup after upgrade

> Le 18 avr. 2021 à 08:22, Felix Zielcke a écrit : > > Am Sonntag, dem 18.04.2021 um 08:17 +0200 schrieb Jean-Daniel: >> systemd don’t need pid files, and the executable must be started >> without forking. >> >> >> Can you show us the content fo the

Re: systemd timeout on startup after upgrade

systemd don’t need pid files, and the executable must be started without forking. Can you show us the content fo the system dovecot.service file. As long as it contains this line, it should be fine: Type=simple ExecStart=/usr/sbin/dovecot -F > Le 18 avr. 2021 à 07:34, Felix Zielcke a

Re: JMAP support?

The HTTP API is just for doveadm and is not related in anyway to JMAP AFAIK. > Le 8 mars 2021 à 23:52, Philip a écrit : > > Didn't JMAP get included with v2.3 with the HTTP API? > > https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2016-March/000313.html > > Or maybe that was just for admin things. >

Re: Feature request.

> Le 10 oct. 2020 à 11:38, @lbutlr a écrit : > > On 09 Oct 2020, at 02:16, Rogier Wolff wrote: >> It turns out that dovecot had been running uninterrupted since august >> 13th, the certificate was renewed on september 7th and I suspect it >> expired on october 7th. > > The ACME protocol

Re: local stanza only generated for IPv6

> Le 1 juil. 2020 à 06:50, Jeremy Ardley a écrit : > > I have a mail server with multiple IP addresses and associated DNS names > > In the dovecot configuration I have a listen directive: > > listen = mail.example.com.com,mail.otherexample.com,localhost > > Multiple local stanzas are of

Re: identify 143 vs 993 clients

> Le 31 mai 2020 à 06:09, Peter a écrit : > > On 29/05/20 11:27 pm, mj wrote: >> Thanks to all who participated in the interesting discussion. >> It seems my initial thought might have been best after all, and >> discontinuing port 143 might be the safest way proceed. > > Yes and no. Some

Re: identify 143 vs 993 clients

> Le 29 mai 2020 à 11:17, Stuart Henderson a écrit : > > On 2020-05-26, mj wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 25/05/2020 23:04, Voytek wrote: >>> jumping here with a question, if I use 143 with STARTTLS, and, force >>> TLS/SSL in configuration, that's equivalent from security POV, isn't >>> it? and,

Re: got a listener on 993

> Le 14 avr. 2020 à 18:57, A. Schulze a écrit : > > > > Am 13.04.20 um 20:52 schrieb David Mehler: >> Hello, >> >> Before I get in to my question is ssl on 993 or starttls on 143 better >> from a security perspective? > > implicit TLS is recommended:

Re: lmtp and recipient_delimiter

> Le 11 mars 2020 à 19:32, Juri Haberland a écrit : > > Hi list, > > I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. > Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both > Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's >

Re: Dovecot HA/Resilience

If you just want active/standby, you can simply use corosync/pacemaker as other already suggest and don’t use Director. I have a dovecot HA server that uses floating IP and pacemaker to managed it, and it works quite well. The only real hard part is having a HA storage. You can simply use a

Re: Perl was: JMAP: Re: http API for IMAP

> Le 19 nov. 2019 à 09:14, Thomas Güttler via dovecot a > écrit : > > Am 18.11.19 um 16:18 schrieb Ralph Seichter via dovecot: >> * Thomas Güttler via dovecot: >>> https://github.com/guettli/programming-guidelines#regex-are-great---but-its-like-eating-rubbish >> Thanks for including the

Re: IMAP4 extensions for Visual Voicemail (VVM)

> Le 20 oct. 2019 à 22:24, Mauricio Tavares via dovecot a > écrit : > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM Rajesh Bansal via dovecot > wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> >> >> I need to develop Visual VoiceMail solution. In this solution I need a IMAP4 >> server, from which I can get a hit for

Re: Password issue

> Le 12 oct. 2019 à 03:26, @lbutlr via dovecot a écrit : > > On Oct 11, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Joseph Tam wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, @lbutlr wrote: >> > Oct 09 16:02:50 imap-login: Info: Aborted login (auth failed, 5 attempts > in 33 secs): user=, xx.xx.xx.xx, PLAIN, TLS >>> >>>

Re: lmtp and virtual users

You set ‘auth_bind' to ‘no' and and you make sure ‘dn’ and ‘dnpass’ are properly configured with a user with enough privileges to read users passwords. And also, you make sure your pass_attrs contains a password attributes (containing the user password hash). > Le 2 oct. 2019 à 19:33, David

Re: New to dovecot admin, question about using LDAP for user-specific values

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 12:53, Gerben Wierda via dovecot a > écrit : > > >> On 13 Sep 2019, at 11:51, Jean-Daniel Dupas > <mailto:jddu...@xooloo.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 09:29, Gerben Wierda via dovecot &

Re: Multiple certificate option SNI

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 12:10, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot > a écrit : > > Hi > I have some problem with SNI and dovecot 2.2.36.4 > > Server debian 9.x ad dovecot-2.2.36.4 > > default server ssl cert is a wildcard like *.domain.com (digicert) > > ssl_ca = /var/control/cert.pem >

Re: New to dovecot admin, question about using LDAP for user-specific values

> Le 13 sept. 2019 à 09:29, Gerben Wierda via dovecot a > écrit : > > Nobody? > >> On 10 Sep 2019, at 11:58, Gerben Wierda via dovecot > > wrote: >> >> I am new to dovecot administration. I’ve read the Wiki but that hasn’t given >> me the understanding I need.

Re: TLS not working with iOS beta?

> Le 4 sept. 2019 à 21:35, Jean-Daniel via dovecot a > écrit : > >> >> Le 4 sept. 2019 à 20:11, Henrik Johansson via dovecot >> a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> Have anyone else experienced problems using Dovecot with the mail app in >&

Re: TLS not working with iOS beta?

> Le 4 sept. 2019 à 20:11, Henrik Johansson via dovecot a > écrit : > > Hi, > > Have anyone else experienced problems using Dovecot with the mail app in beta > releases of iOS/iPadOS 13? > > TLS is failing for my, it have worked fine for years and I am on the latest > Dovecot version now,

Re: [Bug] Sieve vacation :addresses match only case-sensitive?

> Le 4 sept. 2019 à 19:37, Roger Klorese via dovecot a > écrit : > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:25 AM Philipp Faeustlin via dovecot > mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> > Further investigation showed me that it has to be a bug. > > I tested with Dovecot 2.2.36.3 (a7d78f5a2), Pigeonhole

Re: 2.3.7 + stats

Some of the behaviours you observe may be due to the same bug I encountered: https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2019-July/116475.html Especially, regarding the ‘successful' field for auth, which does not exists and is really named ‘success', and which is never set anyway. > Le 15 août 2019

Re: Solr, Dovecot & macOS / iOS

> Le 13 août 2019 à 14:53, Sami Ketola a écrit : > > > >> On 13 Aug 2019, at 15.37, Jean-Daniel via dovecot > <mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Le 13 août 2019 à 14:16, Sami Ketola via dovecot >> <mailto:

Re: Solr, Dovecot & macOS / iOS

> Le 13 août 2019 à 14:16, Sami Ketola via dovecot a > écrit : > > > >> On 13 Aug 2019, at 14.58, James Brown via dovecot >> wrote: >> >> I’m thinking of getting Solr working with my Dovecot server. Server is new >> 6-core Mac Mini, mail store of over 1/2 TB. Mailboxes with 100s of

Re: Auth driver

I’m not familiar with dovecot code, but as I’m using ldap, so I know that the ldap authdb support is not part of dovecot-core package, and is provided as a plugin in an extra package. And a quick look at the libauthdb_ldap.so file (installed by the dovecot-ldap package) shows me these symbols:

Re: submission configuration issues

ns { > haproxy = no > port = 465 > reuse_port = no > ssl = yes > } > } > > Shouldn't the port be 587 here? > > My config file looks like: > > service submission-login { > inet_listener submission { > #port = 587 > } > } >

Re: submission configuration issues

> Le 27 juil. 2019 à 23:13, Stephan Bosch a écrit : > > > > On 23/07/2019 17:13, Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. >> >> I have configured the submission service as foll

Re: submission configuration issues

> Le 27 juil. 2019 à 14:30, Stephan Bosch a écrit : > > On 23/07/2019 17:13, Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having trouble configuring the submission proxy. >> >> I have configured the submission service as follow: &g

submission configuration issues

rejecting the command with an unauthorized user error. What is wrong with my configuration ? Thanks. Jean-Daniel

Re: Dovecot 2.3.0 TLS

> Le 18 juil. 2019 à 11:21, Alexandre Urban via dovecot a > écrit : > > Hello, > > I don’t know who will read this message, but I found this thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=dovecot@dovecot.org=subject:%22Dovecot+2.3.0+TLS%22=newest > And I’m expected the same issue, I will

Re: Purpose of stats-writer and why doveadm try to open it to dump stats ?

> Le 14 juil. 2019 à 11:58, Reio Remma a écrit : > > On 14.07.2019 10:10, Jean-Daniel via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I want to monitor dovecot stats, and so I have an exporter process that run >> with limited rights. >> The monitoring user ha

Purpose of stats-writer and why doveadm try to open it to dump stats ?

Hello, I want to monitor dovecot stats, and so I have an exporter process that run with limited rights. The monitoring user has only access to /var/run/dovecot/stats-reader and it works fine. Doveadm stats dump returns the list of all stats as expected. But each time I run doveadm stats dump,

Re: [bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

Sorry, I forgot to mention this is with the freshly released 2.3.7 > Le 12 juil. 2019 à 16:43, Aki Tuomi via dovecot a écrit > : > > Would you like to try with 2.3.7? It was released today. > > Aki >> On 12/07/2019 17:05 Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot < dovecot@dove

Re: [bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

2 metrics (one for success, one for all) and diff the 2 to get the count of failed attempts. > Le 12 juil. 2019 à 15:31, Jean-Daniel Dupas via dovecot > a écrit : > > Hi, > > I'm playing with the new events, and encounter some issues: > > First the 'auth_request_

[bug] success field never emited in auth_request_finished event

ortant, in the function "auth_request_success_continue()" (auth/auth-request.c:288), "auth_request_log_finished(request)" is call (line 303) before updating the request status: "request->successful = TRUE" (line 312) So the log function never set the success field to "yes" as at this point request->successful is still false. Jean-Daniel

Re: Getting login stats

> Le 11 juil. 2019 à 15:33, Michael Slusarz via dovecot a > écrit : > >> I'm trying to get some IMAP auth stats on a Dovecot 2.3.6 instance, but >> whatever I declare in metric, it always show 0. > > None of these auth_* requests exist in 2.3.6. Thank. So maybe the wiki should be updated

Getting login stats

Hello, I'm trying to get some IMAP auth stats on a Dovecot 2.3.6 instance, but whatever I declare in metric, it always show 0. What I want basically is how many IMAP auth attempts there was on the server, and optional a way to filter on the auth attempt status (successful or failed). My

Re: Some questions

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 14:06, Bardot Jérôme via dovecot a > écrit : > > Le 09/07/2019 à 17:28, Daniel Miller via dovecot a écrit : >> >> On 7/9/2019 6:17 AM, Jérôme Bardot via dovecot wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is my first email here. >>> I want to understand well how dovecot is

Re: Dovecot behind Load Balancer

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 11:46, Paolo Daniele a écrit : > > > > Il 10/07/19 11:44, Jean-Daniel Dupas ha scritto: >> >>> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 10:24, Paolo Daniele via dovecot a >>> écrit : >>> >>> >>> Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuo

Re: Dovecot behind Load Balancer

> Le 10 juil. 2019 à 10:24, Paolo Daniele via dovecot a > écrit : > > > Il 10/07/19 10:20, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: >>> On 12/06/2019 20:02 Paolo Daniele via dovecot wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> i've a question for you. >>> I've two dovecot imap/pop server behind a zen load balancer. >>>

Re: Cannot connect to DOVECOT from Roundcube using SSL on Port 993

> Le 19 juin 2019 à 11:34, zahn via dovecot a écrit : > > Hello > > I try to connect to dovecot from roundcube using this setup: > > $config['default_host'] = 'ssl://chogolisa.akadia.com'; > $config['default_port'] = 993; > > and I get the following error message from dovecot: > > Jun 19

Re: Mail account brute force / harassment

> Le 11 avr. 2019 à 12:23, Marc Roos via dovecot a écrit : > > > > Say for instance you have some one trying to constantly access an > account > > > Has any of you made something creative like this: > > * configure that account to allow to login with any password > * link that account

Re: High availability of Dovecot

> Le 11 avr. 2019 à 10:44, luckydog xf via dovecot a > écrit : > > Hi, list, > > I'm going to deploy postfix + dovecot + CephFS( as Mail Storage). > Basically I want to use two servers for them, which is kind of HA. > > My idea is that using keepalived or Pacemaker to host a

Re: Using SHA256/512 for SQL based password

> Le 13 févr. 2019 à 14:54, Robert Moskowitz via dovecot > a écrit : > > > > On 2/13/19 8:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 13.2.2019 15.18, Robert Moskowitz via dovecot wrote: >>> >>> On 2/13/19 1:23 AM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote: Am 13. Februar 2019 00:34:15 schrieb

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic) packages now available

> Le 25 nov. 2018 à 19:25, Michael Ludwig a écrit > : > > > Hello Dovecot-List, > > so Ubuntu users now can get the latest dovecot version. As I am just building > a production mailserver for customers, this could come in handy, maybe. > For a live production system, is it reasonable to

Re: Ubuntu 18.04 (Bionic) packages now available

They are very welcome, especially as Bionic provides only dovecot 2.2. Thank you :-) > Le 23 nov. 2018 à 13:44, Aki Tuomi a écrit : > > Hi! > > We are excited to announce that we are now providing packages for Ubuntu > 18.04 (Bionic). Please find instructions on how to use them at >

Re: v2.3.2 released

> Le 29 juin 2018 à 14:51, Timo Sirainen a écrit : > > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.2.tar.gz > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.2.tar.gz.sig > > v2.3.2 is mainly a bugfix release. It contains all the changes in v2.2.36, as > well as a bunch of other fixes (mainly

Re: Dovecot send duplicated certificates when using ssl_alt_cert

> Le 24 mai 2018 à 09:55, Aki Tuomi <aki.tu...@dovecot.fi> a écrit : > > > > On 17.05.2018 16:33, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 2018-05-16 (08:54 MDT), Jean-Daniel Dupas <jddu...@xooloo.com> wrote: >>> My problem is that when connecting, dovecot includes 2

dovecot 2.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.3 from repo.dovecot.org on ubuntu 16.04 LTS, and I'm wondering if there is a scheduled date for the release of the bionic package in that repository. The Ubuntu mainstream version is based on the 2.2 branch, which prevent us to use it.

Dovecot send duplicated certificates when using ssl_alt_cert

Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.3.1 (c5a5c0c82) and trying to experiment with using both RSA and ECDSA certificates. My configuration is as follow: ssl_alt_cert =

[Dovecot] Howto reindex with solr?

Hi, I am currently testing a 2.1 dovecot setup with fts-solr. Search speed is simply amazing. I decided to try to delete and rebuild the solr indexes, but i can't seem to rebuild them thru dovecot. At first, when telnetting to the imap server, the search initially built the index, and then

[Dovecot] Single instance storage

I have read most of the doc on the dovecot website, and couldn't find any info on the single instance storage feature, so I'm posting my questions here. - Are these 3 parameters the only one necessary for single instance storage? I cannot find any doc on this feature on the website; is there

[Dovecot] mdbox + gzip and rsync

Hi, After reading the following paragraph from the dovecot doc, I've been wondering how it would affect rsync (when combined with gzip): Expunging a message only decreases the message's refcount. The space is later freed in purge step. This is typically done in a nightly cronjob when there's

Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?

/lib21_fts_solr_plugin.so But nothing indicating that solr_plugin is being used. Any idea? i'd really like to be able to clearly see that I'm using solr. Regards, -JD On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 18:26 -0500, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote

Re: [Dovecot] testing fts-solr?

. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien jd.beaub...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I had to fix a few things. First of all, I had to declare mail_plugins = fts fts_solr in global file (dovecot.conf). After doing that, running doveadm fts optimize stopped giving me errors. I ran

[Dovecot] testing fts-solr?

hi everyone, However, how can I verify that solr is working properly? Background: - I'm trying to setup 2.1 with fts_solr and eventually test maildir/mdbox. - I used the following webpage as reference to setup solr:

[Dovecot] maildir vs mdbox

Hi, I am planning on running on test between maildir and mdbox to see which is a better fit for my use case. And I'm just looking for general advice/recommendation. I will post any results I obtain here. Important question: I have multiple users hitting the same email account at the same time.

Re: [Dovecot] maildir vs mdbox

recommend i start testing with (mdbox_rotate_size and mdbox_rotate_interval). -JD On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 28.1.2012, at 17.59, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: I am planning on running on test between maildir and mdbox to see which is a better fit

Re: [Dovecot] maildir vs mdbox

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 28.1.2012, at 18.13, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: Considering my use case (small number of accounts but alot of emails per account, and I should add that they are mostly small emails, most under 5k, alot under 30k) what

Re: [Dovecot] Persistence of UIDs

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 25.1.2012, at 5.22, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: I have a question concerning UIDs. How persistant are they? With Dovecot persistent enough. But as Michael said, check UIDVALIDITY. I am thinking about building some form

Re: [Dovecot] Persistence of UIDs

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote: On 25.1.2012, at 15.34, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: I am thinking about building some form of webmail specialized for some specific business purpose and I am thinking of building a sort of cache in a DB by storing

[Dovecot] Persistence of UIDs

Hi everyone, I have a question concerning UIDs. How persistant are they? I am thinking about building some form of webmail specialized for some specific business purpose and I am thinking of building a sort of cache in a DB by storing the email addr, date, subject and UID for quick lookups and