I tried to enable it on postfix smtp_sasl_auth_enable, but it is was not
advertise.
That is because "smtp" is not the same as "smtpd".
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sasl_auth_enable
___
dovecot mailing list --
bound to fail
I was only trying to check if the smtp-auth is advertise by doing ehlo.
> where is this change ?
My client ip was listed in sorbs.net. I could not connect to the smtp
server.
> how do you know its postfix ?
Because i did an apt install postfix on the node. dovecot is on th
i did an apt install postfix on the node. dovecot is on the same node.
Regards,
-badli
From: Benny Pedersen
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2023, 20:22
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: dovecot sasl with postfix, smtp auth not available
Badli Al Rashid skrev den 2023
Badli Al Rashid skrev den 2023-04-23 13:06:
My apologies, i am not using dovecot for submission server using
postfix with dovecot-sasl.
then post doveconf -n that shows it
I was not able to authenticate if I use a webmail when testing using
username to authenticate with smtp connection
Hi,
My apologies, i am not using dovecot for submission server using postfix with
dovecot-sasl.
I was not able to authenticate if I use a webmail when testing using username
to authenticate with smtp connection it fails.
I could authenticate normally using port 465 / 587 but it is block
On 04-22-2023 11:15 pm, Badli Al Rashid wrote:
I have set up dovecot sasl with postfix. When I check the smtp with ehlo there
is no auth advertise.
There shouldn't be on port 25. Users should do email submission on port 587 or
465.
But if you really want there to be...
http
Hi All,
I have set up dovecot sasl with postfix. When I check the smtp with ehlo there
is no auth advertise.
Connected to www.zystro.xyz.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 www.zystro.xyz
ehlo x.zystro.xyz
250-www.zystro.xyz
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 10485760
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250
On 4/19/23 4:34 PM, John Gateley via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
For mobile clients (gmail on Android), I need a server side searching
solution.
...
Thank you everyone for the suggestions. I will try them and report back.
John
___
dovecot
* Aki Tuomi via dovecot, 20.04.23 11:46
[...]
Biggest issue in my mind is that you will need to tell Solr to update
it's indexes (somehow) when using version 8 before upgrading to 9.
Because the older indexes are no longer compatible with 9.
If by that you mean migrating from [Fast]LRUCache
> On 20/04/2023 07:35 EEST Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 20/04/2023 00:34 EEST John Gateley via dovecot
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> > For mobile clients (gmail on Android), I need a server side searching
> > soluti
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:34 -0500, John Gateley via dovecot wrote:
> Hello,
> For mobile clients (gmail on Android), I need a server side searching
> solution.
> A few months ago, I tried getting Solr to work with Dovecot, but failed.
> The instructions here https://
On 2023-04-19, John Gateley via dovecot wrote:
> The instructions here
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/solr/ are quite out of
> date, they reference Debian 8 and 9 (current version 11), and Solr 7.7
> (current version 9.2)
There are some posts on this list
On 20/04/2023 00:34 EEST John Gateley via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
For mobile clients (gmail on Android), I need a server side searching solution.
A few months ago, I tried getting Solr to work with Dovecot, but failed
Hello,
For mobile clients (gmail on Android), I need a server side searching
solution.
A few months ago, I tried getting Solr to work with Dovecot, but failed.
The instructions here
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/fts/solr/ are quite out of
date, they reference Debian 8 and 9
> On 12/04/2023 21:50 EEST Stephane Magnier
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In the past, I've done a Dovecot Backup with a Rsync cmd... every day
> Today I need to get back these mailboxes.. and doesn't work out
> 1) first of all, I tried to make a simple copy..
Hi,
In the past, I've done a Dovecot Backup with a Rsync cmd... every day
Today I need to get back these mailboxes.. and doesn't work out
1) first of all, I tried to make a simple copy... Now way . Couldn't
access the INBOX Do you think that it could work that way ? I don't
need
> On 11/04/2023 09:09 EEST Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> > On 11/04/2023 09:03 EEST Aki Tuomi wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 10/04/2023 15:37 EEST Martin Stenzel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi team,
> > > regardi
> On 11/04/2023 09:03 EEST Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> > On 10/04/2023 15:37 EEST Martin Stenzel wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi team,
> > regarding:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg77000.html
> >
> >
> > I hav
> On 10/04/2023 15:37 EEST Martin Stenzel wrote:
>
>
> Hi team,
> regarding:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg77000.html
>
>
> I have the very same problem.
>
>
Hi!
It seems that the ruby openssl module interface has changed sligh
> Op 10 apr. 2023 om 18:40 heeft Martin Stenzel het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>
> Hi team,
>
> regarding:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg77000.html
>
>
>
> I have the very same problem.
>
>
>
> terve:/tmp # d
Hi team,
regarding:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg77000.html
I have the very same problem.
terve:/tmp #decrypt.rb -k /etc/dovecot/mailcrypt/ecpubkey.pem -f
./1681118363terve.xy-space.de\,S\=3452\,W\=3515\:2\,S
Key(s) (total: 1)
- Key type : EC
- Key digest
Ahhh... thanks Viktor and ptld. Adding an entry for @sub.example.com to
virtual_alias_maps fixed everything.
How, exactly, do postfix and dovecot communicate when postfix attempts to
determine whether to deliver a message to the dovecot LDA, or to bounce it? In
other words, how does postfix decide to bounce foo, and deliver bar, in these
log messages:
This would be better answered on the postfix
[apologies for postfix/dovecot cross-post]
How, exactly, do postfix and dovecot communicate when postfix attempts
to determine whether to deliver a message to the dovecot LDA, or to
bounce it? In other words, how does postfix decide to bounce foo, and
deliver bar, in these log messages
Hi all
On debian stable, dovecot 2.3.13+dfsg1-2+deb11u1 and postfix 3.5.17-0+deb11u1
I set postfix sending mails to dovecot for mailbox storage:
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp
dovecot listen with lmtp:
service lmtp {
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp
Dear Dovecot experts,
in 2017 Stephan Bosch mentioned in an email about the Dovecot submission
proxy [0]:
"The current implementation does require that the proxy has direct
access to the user's mailbox for BURL (e.g. by running it on the same
host as imap), but that restriction s
works,
but the 2nd user (having about 14k messages) fails. The failure seems to
happen immediatly after starting the replication attempt).
I saw the replication crashing using Dovecot packages from the current
Debian distro. In order to debug this, I'm now using 2.3.20, built from
Git
* j...@w3.org, 27.03.23 15:28
[...]
Could someone confirm me if those 7.7.0 configuration files are compatible with
8.11.2? A diff between those files and the ones from the 8.11.2 dist reveal some
changes, starting from the LuceneVersion.
[...]
Following https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot
Hello,
dovecot version 2.3.13 (89f716dc2)
The dovecot solr installation guide [1] gives links and configuration info for
sorl 7.7.0. However, sorl was deprecated some time ago. Those links to 7.7.0
don't work anymore. Sorl is currently available in versions 8.11.2 and 9.1.1
[3].
Specifically
n (LTO)
enabled. This didn´t work for Dovecot, so until now LTO was disabled
for Dovecot. There is a way to make it work though, see the following
link:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997513#20
So far a f
In openSUSE Tumbleweed (and several other distributions as well),
packages are build by default with linktime optimization (LTO)
enabled. This didn´t work for Dovecot, so until now LTO was disabled
for Dovecot. There is a way to make it work though, see the following
link:
https
21.03.23, 14:58 +0100, Aki Tuomi:
On 21/03/2023 15:50 EET Markus Schönhaber wrote:
given a bunch of files, each containing the raw source of a single email
message. There's no structural or naming scheme like Maildir or something.
Is there a (easy) way to import those mails into dovecot
> On 21/03/2023 15:50 EET Markus Schönhaber
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> given a bunch of files, each containing the raw source of a single email
> message. There's no structural or naming scheme like Maildir or something.
> Is there a (easy) way to import those
Hi,
given a bunch of files, each containing the raw source of a single email
message. There's no structural or naming scheme like Maildir or something.
Is there a (easy) way to import those mails into dovecot?
AIUI doveadm import needs a source location in a supported mailbox
format - which
> On 20/03/2023 13:21 EET Felix Auringer wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an issue with debug logging when using a custom plugin for Dovecot. In
> my plugin, I create a child event of the session's user event:
>
> ```c
> struct event *plugin_event = even
Hello,
I have an issue with debug logging when using a custom plugin for Dovecot. In
my plugin, I create a child event of the session's user event:
```c
struct event *plugin_event = event_create(list->ns->user->event);
event_set_name(plugin_event, "oidc_shared_ma
I am sorry if this is not the correct list for asking this. T try to build
dovecot 2.3.20 from source on a QNAP NAS, which is a linux variant. There is an
dovecot available, but this does not include a pigeonhole sieve,
that’s why I try to build it from source. The configure script works fine
>>> After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending
>>> operations" have
>>> cleared.
>>
>> Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged
>> (bitflip, ...)?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Gerald
>
> I don't have the logs from that time them nor do I
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Gerald Galster wrote:
> > After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending
> > operations" have
> > cleared.
>
> Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged
> (bitflip, ...)?
>
> Best regards,
> Gerald
> After the above, it's no longer crashing, and my email client's "pending
> operations" have
> cleared.
Does your server use ECC memory and if so, are there any errors logged
(bitflip, ...)?
Best regards,
Gerald
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:01:35AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 12. Mar 2023, at 20.17, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > Mar 12 10:32:27 goffin dovecot[8269]: imap(patman)<8452>:
> > Panic: file istream-header-filter.c: line 663
> > (i_stream_header_filter
On 12. Mar 2023, at 20.17, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>
> Mar 12 10:32:27 goffin dovecot[8269]: imap(patman)<8452>:
> Panic: file istream-header-filter.c: line 663
> (i_stream_header_filter_snapshot_free): assertion failed:
> (snapshot->mstream->snapshot_pending)
T
that deleted emails were not actually getting deleted, that it has a bunch of
> "pending
> operations" it has were not running, and that dovecot has been crashing like
> this since
> about feb 2 (over a month ago). I can't figure out what changed at that time,
> but my c
Hi -
I'm hitting a crash in dovecot, I get this logged followed by a terse stack
trace and
systemd-coredump details not included here - full gdb stack trace and more
details are
further down:
Mar 12 10:32:26 goffin dovecot[8269]: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.1.4, lip
s/
without an actual example. I tried to use this (sorry in German)
https://dokuwiki.tachtler.net/doku.php?id=tachtler:dovecot_shares
and this got me a little further down the track.
I followed the instructions required for the dovecot config files.
Restarted dovecot, not errors displayed in the log
Due to a recent topic regarding the performance of the Roundcube webmailer with
Dovecot as a backend, I set up imapproxy successfully, shrinking the response
latency of the webmailer heavily, which is great.
However, I still encounter strange timeouts on some requests when Roundcube
tries
Sorry, replying to an old thread found on mail-archive.com
<http://mail-archive.com/>, so it’s not threaded email.
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg84776.html
I have just installed Dovecot onto Mac Studio running Ventura (macOS 13.2.1)
and get the same error with D
Morning again! Working with my directors node.
Does anybody now how to obtain a list of all users hashes?
I know how to obtain for one user example:
*doveadm director status user@domain*
I am looking to a way or command to take a list of hashed epired
(1)#: doveadm director status
Hi
I had the same problem
fstab:
Ip:/vmail /vmail nfs
rw,sec=sys,noexec,noatime,tcp,soft,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,intr,nordirplus,nfsvers=3,actimeo=120
/vmail on /vmail type nfs
15.02.2023 16:58, Maciej Milaszewski пишет:
Can you send me info about mounted options (fstab) and what is your
kernel and nfs version in client and your storage
Hi Maciej,
Client=>
fstab:
IP-address:/data /data nfs
auto,nofail,noatime,intr,tcp,nordirplus,actimeo=18000 0
ildir/dovecot-uidlist
line XX: Invalid data: for some email accounts.
For example,
dovecot-uidlist line 21197: Invalid data:
When I open line 21197 in editor:
# vim +21197 dovecot-uidlist
1750207 :1676454069.M698819P4439.mail-b,S=963716,W=976359
and then check this file size
# ls -l
/data
> On 15/02/2023 13:58 EET Sohin Vyacheslav wrote:
>
>
> 15.02.2023 13:42, Aki Tuomi пишет:
> > Every time that happens I've seen it's been zerofilled (due to NFS), and
> > not yet filled with actual data. Size might be right, but it just contains
> > NULs.
>
> Thank you, Aki for
15.02.2023 13:42, Aki Tuomi пишет:
Every time that happens I've seen it's been zerofilled (due to NFS), and not
yet filled with actual data. Size might be right, but it just contains NULs.
Thank you, Aki for clarifying! you mean lines like this:
> On 15/02/2023 13:32 EET Sohin Vyacheslav wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> In mail.log are exists error messages "Error: Broken file
> /data/mail/vhosts/domain.com/u...@domain.com/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist
> line XX: Invalid data: for some email accounts.
>
>
Hi All,
In mail.log are exists error messages "Error: Broken file
/data/mail/vhosts/domain.com/u...@domain.com/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist
line XX: Invalid data: for some email accounts.
For example,
dovecot-uidlist line 21197: Invalid data:
When I open line 21197 in editor:
# vim +
-algorithm rsa-pkeyopt rsa_keygen_bits:4096 -out
/etc/ssl/private/ca_dovecot_lmtps.key
openssl req-x509 -new -subj '/CN=Dovecot LMTP Authorization CA' -key
/etc/ssl/private/ca_dovecot_lmtps.key-nodes -sha256 -days 3650 -addext
'keyUsage=keyCertSign,cRLSign' -out /etc/ssl/private
Hi All,
I hope this is the correct place to post this. If not, apologies.
I am in the process of updating my company's email servers and am
trying to put Dovecot into an Alpine Linux container, hosted on ProxMox.
In my setup, local mail deliveries via LMTP can come from the MSA
> On 01/02/2023 14:07 EET Jose Celestino wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it's possible to lighten the process of converting
> sdbox mailboxes to zlib by, instead of using dsync (that brings much more io,
> copying from alt - and copying of unneeded data as we have many mails
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to lighten the process of converting
sdbox mailboxes to zlib by, instead of using dsync (that brings much more io,
copying from alt - and copying of unneeded data as we have many mails already
compressed from activating zlib a couble of years ago) just
l kinds of HTTP calls to Roundcube, not only the ones triggering IMAP). When
> the dovecot becomes unavailable, the performance without mails jumps to 7700
> req/s. Testing is done with 4 JMeter-servers and one client.
>
Should you not be testing also dovecot performance direc
Subject: [REVISIONS] How to install SSL Certificate on Dovecot and Postfix
Good day from Singapore,
Author: Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming (TARGETED INDIVIDUAL)
Country: Singapore
Date of Implementation: 6 Jan 2023 Friday
SECTION ON DOVECOT
===
# cd /etc/dovecot/conf.d
t only the ones triggering IMAP). When
> the dovecot becomes unavailable, the performance without mails jumps to 7700
> req/s. Testing is done with 4 JMeter-servers and one client.
>
Should you not be testing also dovecot performance directly? So you can see
what is it's maximum. I can't
are you running (squirrelmail's) imapproxy on the roundcube machine? it
keeps user imap connections active to dovecot, meaning that roundcube
doesn't have to constantly log back in via imap for each operation.
that might help somewhat.
(we just use the debian package version of imapproxy
Good day,
I am currently setting up/debugging a webmailer-only setup using Roundcube
(latest version) with Dovecot (2.3.20, latest as of now).
Generally speaking the setup performs OK, I wrote a JMeter Roundcube script to
test the Roundcube. This includes actions like listing mails
the Courier scheme. Now, while
LAM correctly stores the value in bytes, it appends the letter S.
Unfortunately, the mail server Dovecot cannot do anything with this
letter S.
Is there a better scheme for Dovecot? I haven't found any until now. Or
can I remove the letter S at the end in the Dovecot
It might have a noticeable effect on clients.
I encountered (probably triggered by this in some way?) that I was unable to
het the 'read' bit set in macOS Mail.app. Maybe (as I am doing HA with round
robin) the Mail.app client got to one dovecot repository on one tcp connection
rategy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site)
Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book/>
Book: Mastering ArchiMate <https://ea.rna.nl/the-book-edition-iii/>
> On 15 Jan 2023, at 23:12, Tomaz Kavcic wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a
Hello,
I have a question in regards to specific dovecot replication behaviour
and I'm just wondering if this is actually an expected/normal behaviour,
or just a version issue.
I'm using dovecot 2.3.16 which is packed by default with latest Ubuntu
22.04.1 LTS server release. I setup
have seen is alpine, if you want to stick to
os released packages.
Quoting Jelmer Vernooij :
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:54:38AM +0100, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I just found out that Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS has a dovecot apt
package that is 2.3.16. Debian 11 (stable) is at dovecot 2.3.13
le.com): Started userdb lookup
lmtp(some...@example.com)<314>: Debug: auth-master:
conn unix:/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb: Connecting
lmtp(some...@example.com)<314>: Debug: auth-master:
conn unix:/var/run/dovecot/auth-userdb (pid=144,uid=0): Client connected (fd=18)
lmtp(some...@example.com)
to find a flag
to turn off.) But the error seems to persist.
Dovecot Configs
# 2.3.19.1 (9b53102964): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.19 (4eae2f79)
# OS: Linux 5.15.0-57-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS
# Hostname: mailserver-dovecot-7c9ff7b94b-h4r8m
auth_mechanisms
> On 08/01/2023 18:55 EET Baljeet Bhinder wrote:
>
>
> I have been using postfix+dovecot successfully for a while now until I tried
> mail crypt plugin lately. I tried what is describe here
> https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_crypt_plugin/ and I went
I have been using postfix+dovecot successfully for a while now until I
tried mail crypt plugin lately. I tried what is describe here
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/mail_crypt_plugin/ and I
went for global-keys as described here:
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual
Gerben Wierda skrev den 2023-01-05 21:34:
Hmm: according to the documentation, the default is "imap pop3 lmtp"
But my installation (2.3.20, Alpine apk) for some reason only ran
"imap" by default
and now you know there is no defaults ?
in case of not working a doveconf -n would be helpfull on
> }
>>>
>>>> unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/lmtp {
>>>> mode = 0660
>>>> user = postfix
>>>> group = postfix
>>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not
/spool/postfix/private/lmtp {
>>> mode = 0660
>>> user = postfix
>>> group = postfix
>>> }
>>
>>
>> Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not sure what
>> dovecot does, does it bind to both or does it pick one and ignor
group = postfix
>> }
>
>
> Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not sure what
> dovecot does, does it bind to both or does it pick one and ignore the other.
> You only need to use one or the other.
>
> And what does your postfix side look like? Where is
group = postfix
>> }
>
>
> Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not sure what
> dovecot does, does it bind to both or does it pick one and ignore the other.
> You only need to use one or the other.
>
> And what does your postfix side look like? Wh
r = postfix
> > group = postfix
> > }
>
>
> Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not sure what
> dovecot does, does it bind to both or does it pick one and ignore the other.
> You only need to use one or the other.
>
> And what does your postfix side lo
service lmtp {
inet_listener lmtp {
address = 127.0.0.1
port = 24
}
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/private/lmtp {
mode = 0660
user = postfix
group = postfix
}
Looks like you are activating both a socket and a port. Im not sure what
dovecot does, does it bind to both or does it pick one
> On 05/01/2023 18:38 EET Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
>
> I am setting up a new server combination (postfix + dovecot). dovecot's auth
> service works for postfix. Just lmtp does not and I need to find out why. I
> don't see anything in the dovecot logging, but I see this o
I am setting up a new server combination (postfix + dovecot). dovecot's auth
service works for postfix. Just lmtp does not and I need to find out why. I
don't see anything in the dovecot logging, but I see this on the postfix side
(debug)
Jan 05 16:11:59 snape postfix/lmtp[127]: connection
Can you verify that the stalling occurs with 2.3.20? We have a potential fix
for 2.3.20 also for an TLS stall, so if someone is willing, they could try and
let us know, see:
https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2023-January/125929.html
Aki
> On 05/01/2023 17:55 EET Joachim Lindenberg wr
In my experiments I also experienced replication being stalled when running
with ssl. Is this being looked into?
Thanks,
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: dovecot Im Auftrag von Paul Kudla
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2023 02:46
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: Migrating
ok just a few quick things about replication
1. you should upgrade both versions to at least dovecot-2.3.19.1.tar.gz
(2.3.18 had issues on larges folder counts - you will probably run into
this on smaller servers but just sharing the experience)
2. i found replication worked better without
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:54:38AM +0100, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> I just found out that Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS has a dovecot apt package that
> is 2.3.16. Debian 11 (stable) is at dovecot 2.3.13 with apt. if I looked
> correctly. Dovecot itself is at 2.3.20.
>
> That surpris
I just found out that Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS has a dovecot apt package that is
2.3.16. Debian 11 (stable) is at dovecot 2.3.13 with apt. if I looked
correctly. Dovecot itself is at 2.3.20.
That surprised me (I am new to the Linux distro and package management world)
as Ubuntu 22.04 is a Long
So, I did set it up.
As I am using not real users (but a cram md5 passwd db file with every user
uid=dovecot, gid=mail) and my dovecots are owning everything in the mail store
I had to synchronise uid/gid of the dovecots on both ends
After I did that, I tested the sync. And while it has worked
2.7266
Email p...@scom.ca
On 1/4/2023 7:46 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
I am in the process of migrating from dovecot on one OS (macOS/darwin)
to a new server running dovecot with another OS (Ubuntu Linux 22.4).
I have mostly copied/adapted the setup of the old server to the new. I
am in the p
I am in the process of migrating from dovecot on one OS (macOS/darwin) to a new
server running dovecot with another OS (Ubuntu Linux 22.4).
I have mostly copied/adapted the setup of the old server to the new. I am in
the process of finishing that and adding some stuff that still needs
On 30 December 2022 22:25:09 CET, James Moe wrote:
>On 2022-12-27 16:19, James Moe wrote:
>
>> I changed logging to use a path rather than syslog. Doing so makes it
>> easier
>> to work with fail2ban.
>> Dovecot fails to start with the error:
>>
On 2022-12-27 16:19, James Moe wrote:
> I changed logging to use a path rather than syslog. Doing so makes it easier
> to work with fail2ban.
> Dovecot fails to start with the error:
> Can't open log file /data01/var/log/dovecot.log: Permission denied
>
Yes, it was apparm
ies in the previous message:
> > 2022-12-29T20:17:56-0700 sma-server3 dovecot[12102]: Can't open log file
> > /data01/var/log/dovecot.log: Permission denied
> > 2022-12-29T20:17:56-0700 sma-server3 systemd[1]: dovecot.service: Main
> > process exited, code=exited, status=
> On 30/12/2022 05:25 EET James Moe wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-28 00:27, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> > The `log` service runs by default as root, not as dovecot.
> >
> Then I do not understand why there is a permissions problem at all. It is
> root!
>
> &g
On 2022-12-28 00:27, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> The `log` service runs by default as root, not as dovecot.
>
Then I do not understand why there is a permissions problem at all. It is
root!
> If data01 is a NFS mount, then root may become squashed.
>
Not an NFS mount. It is local.
&
> On 28/12/2022 01:19 EET James Moe wrote:
>
>
> dovecot 2.3.15
> opensuse LEAP 15.4
>
> I changed logging to use a path rather than syslog. Doing so makes it easier
> to work with fail2ban.
> Dovecot fails to start with the error:
> Can't open log fi
dovecot 2.3.15
opensuse LEAP 15.4
I changed logging to use a path rather than syslog. Doing so makes it easier
to work with fail2ban.
Dovecot fails to start with the error:
Can't open log file /data01/var/log/dovecot.log: Permission denied
Permissions:
drwxrwxr-x 1 root users 104 Feb
On 24/12/22 01:25, Aki Tuomi wrote:
Can you confirm that CVE-2022-30550 is patched in dovecot-2.3.20? Thank
you.
We've decided to fix it for 2.4 release only, so it's not fixed in 2.3.20.
That is a surprising decision.
The bug does not, in fact, affect that many setups, and we do
> On 23/12/2022 14:23 EET Eray Aslan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:59:54AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > > On 23/12/2022 11:47 EET Eray Aslan wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > > > We
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:59:54AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > On 23/12/2022 11:47 EET Eray Aslan wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:06:16AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > > We are pleased to release v2.3.20 of Dovecot.
> >
> > Can you confirm that CVE-2022-3
401 - 500 of 59905 matches
Mail list logo
