Timo Sirainen wrote:
But I don't think there are any problems if you make INBOX. namespace
the hidden one. Most clients don't care about namespaces.
Hi Timo, thanks for the reply - I understand what you're saying. Can you
theorize what will happen to the already configured/subscribed users
(apologies if this has been covered, can't find it on the Wiki/FAQ, etc.)
We have a stellar, fantastic, hard working Dovecot 1.0.5 (yes, I need to
upgrade) installation running in Courier-IMAP compatibility mode:
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=/var/spool/dovecot/indexes/%1u/%u
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
--
Best regards,
Charles
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it;
the empty prefix namespace is the inbox =
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can I add a second hidden namespace with no prefix:
Certainly...
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Namespaces
See, the wiki page has it backwards though of the way I need to do it; the
empty prefix namespace is the inbox = yes, not the hidden =
Charles Marcus wrote:
No, but there's no reason it wouldn't... a namespace is a namespace.
Easiest is to just try it...
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and just trying things is not an
option. I'm normally a
On 5/23/2008, Troy Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...I think you missed the whole part of my original email that stated
this is a live, hard working server and just trying things is not
an option. I'm normally a just-push-the-button type of guy, but in
this case I need to get quantified
