On 20/12/2011 7:41 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can you try if changing it back helps? Or by running the same LDAP query using
ldapsearch. Is there a reason why you changed the scope? (I'm not entirely sure
what the LDAP schemes usually look like..)
Hi Timo,
The same query, using ldapsearch
I resend, because I forgot to change the true domain once and the
previous message would appear to include inconsistencies...
Sorry for this...
On 20/12/2011 7:41 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can you try if changing it back helps? Or by running the same LDAP query using
ldapsearch. Is there a
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:10 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 20/12/2011 7:41 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Can you try if changing it back helps? Or by running the same LDAP query
using ldapsearch. Is there a reason why you changed the scope? (I'm not
entirely sure what the LDAP schemes
On 20/12/2011 10:15 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Try adding (objectClass=posixAccount) as filter in the ldapsearch.
That's the default iterate_filter.
We've caught it! Only the returned (30) accounts include the
posixAccount objectClass!
So I added in the LDAP setup:
iterate_filter =
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:47 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 20/12/2011 10:15 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Try adding (objectClass=posixAccount) as filter in the ldapsearch.
That's the default iterate_filter.
We've caught it! Only the returned (30) accounts include the
posixAccount
I installed a newer kernel on these boxes, and it's fixed. Seems to be
a problem with the stock debian squeeze kernel. Not a dovecot issue, but
others with a stable squeeze box might see similar problems so good
to have it in the archive :)
regards,
Cor
On 20/12/2011 09:11, Cor Bosman wrote:
I installed a newer kernel on these boxes, and it's fixed. Seems to be
a problem with the stock debian squeeze kernel. Not a dovecot issue, but
others with a stable squeeze box might see similar problems so good
to have it in the archive :)
Indeed; very
On 20/12/2011 10:57 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:47 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So I added in the LDAP setup:
iterate_filter = (objectClass=*)
and now everything works fine!
Isn't that basically the same as an empty filter? What other types of
objectClasses are
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:06 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
Isn't that basically the same as an empty filter? What other types of
objectClasses are there with user accounts? Perhaps the default should
be changed to empty, or maybe to (uid=*)
I agree that the default should be changed to
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:13 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I agree that the default should be changed to empty.
But that also returns non-user results, like at least in my test setup
it returns an organization and admin.
..
Perhaps: iterate_filter = (uid=*)
Actually, the current default
On 20/12/2011 10:57 πμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:47 +0200, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
So I added in the LDAP setup:
iterate_filter = (objectClass=*)
and now everything works fine!
Isn't that basically the same as an empty filter?
And I forgot to answer: Yes,
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does doveadm index -A INBOX reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed not subbed under INBOX?
It indexes INBOX (only) for all users. And it doesn't reindex
anything, it just adds any missing stuff.
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:37 +0100, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
Wiki instructions for creating insert trigger for PostgreSQL are wrong
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/Dict
Calling INSERT on the table from within BEFORE INSERT trigger creates
cascading trigger.
Yes..
Instead, one should return
On 20/12/2011 12:15 μμ, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Perhaps: iterate_filter = (uid=*)
Actually, the current default iterate_filter is fine, if you look at the
default pass/user filters:
#user_filter = ((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u))
#pass_filter = ((objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u))
This
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 12:05 +1100, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
I'm testing out 2.1.rc1, building against clucene 2.3.3.4.
Without libstemmber, the build fails because it attempts to include
SnowballAnalyzer.h which is not part of core clucene.
It was actually supposed to be distributed with
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 22:10 +0100, Maria Arrea wrote:
I have seen some strange error log messages in our dovecot server (2.0.15,
RHEL 5.7x64, mdbox+zlib, local storage, high load)
Dec 14 22:01:27 buzon dovecot: imap(fmcarrasco): Error:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 15:50 -0800, Robin wrote:
I can confirm the report posted in
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-November/062263.html that
fts_squat no longer seems to be used after moving from 2.0.16-2.1 rc
1. I don't see crash reports in the logs, just 0 messages indexed.
My search
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 09:39 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
I'm strugling to find some documentation on dovecot's anvil service
and/or its penalties (that can be checked with doveadm penalty) ... but
i'm not finding anything on that.
is there any documentation on
Hello Timo and Urban
I took quite a long time to reply, but as I told you this issue does
not verify very often, so I had enabled verbose logging and just
waited ..
I summarize the situation - user mmanzoni sometimes does not receive a
message - it does not matter if he is the only
Well I've got some servers running 1.0 with dovecot, however, I make the
installation of Dovecot 2.0 and would like to understand better the way it
works.
It uses the files in / etc / dovecot / conf.d right?
Example: protocol pop3 protocol imap {{or
is everything in /
Hello Timo, thank you in advance. Full log here (1 hour time range)
Dec 14 21:19:43 buzon postfix/pipe[27103]: 4423BC7C31: to=fmcarrasco@domain,
relay=dovecot, delay=0.24, delays=0.03
/0/0/0.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via dovecot service)
Dec 14 21:20:59 buzon dovecot:
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 12:46 +0100, Marco Carcano wrote:
Hello Timo and Urban
I took quite a long time to reply, but as I told you this issue does
not verify very often, so I had enabled verbose logging and just
waited ..
Enabling mail_log plugin and/or lazy_expunge plugin would have
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 10:26 -0200, drum.lu...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I've got some servers running 1.0 with dovecot, however, I make the
installation of Dovecot 2.0 and would like to understand better the way it
works.
It uses the files in / etc / dovecot / conf.d right?
Example: protocol
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 13:48 +0100, Maria Arrea wrote:
Hello Timo, thank you in advance. Full log here (1 hour time range)
It could be useful to have all error/warning messages logged to their
own file, so you could quickly see a list of all errors from the last
day or two. That's also the log
Hello Timo
and thanks again for the ultra quick reply!
Enabling mail_log plugin and/or lazy_expunge plugin would have helped
more (both mentioned in my previous mail).
Sorry - I thought I have enabled it, but maybe I did something wrong
with the configuration and it was not enabled:
On 12/20/2011 3:38 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
It seems we have a few email addresses that are not RFC 5322 compliant,
and now that we've started using sieve these are failing. The problem is
that we have a few addresses with leading, trailing or double dots in
the local part:
On 20.12.2011, at 16.52, Marco Carcano wrote:
Enabling mail_log plugin and/or lazy_expunge plugin would have helped
more (both mentioned in my previous mail).
Sorry - I thought I have enabled it, but maybe I did something wrong with
the configuration and it was not enabled:
here is
Hi, everybody!
Question: Why imap_open function doesn't work while getting a mailbox through
telnet works perfectly?
Note: imap.so is loaded! imap.ini is parsed!
Hi, everybody!
Question: Why imap_open function doesn't work while getting a mailbox through
telnet works perfectly?
Note: imap.so is loaded! imap.ini is parsed!php flags is checked!
Is it a bug?
if it works through telnet, so dovecot is working and you probably
have a PHP problem, which should be probably pointed to a PHP related
mailing list.
Em 20/12/11 17:20, I M escreveu:
Hi, everybody!
Question: Why imap_open function doesn't work while getting a mailbox through
telnet
On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does doveadm index -A INBOX reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed not subbed under INBOX?
It indexes INBOX (only) for all users. And it doesn't reindex
Hi,
We're running dovecot 1.2.15 and use SQL authentication. We'd like to
be able to support APOP, but can't see how this would fit in with SQL
auth.
Currently we have:
password_query = SELECT email as user, password FROM virtual_users
WHERE email='%u' or (email LIKE '%n@%%' AND unhashed='%w')
We created a new virtual domain and created a user in that domain in
our pgsql database. Instead of creating any directory structure in
/home/virtual/mail/domain/user, I just sent a test email to see if
dovecot's lmtp would autocreate. And it did! And mail appears to be
delivered to an inbox..
Timo,
we want to implement SPECIAL-USE in Thunderbird (TB), but we've run into
problems. I believe you could help change that.
Here's the problem:
By default TB only lists subscribed (LSUB) folders when it accesses an IMAP
server. However when I do a LSUB on recent Dovecot 2.1 code from
Quoting Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de:
we want to implement SPECIAL-USE in Thunderbird (TB), but we've run into
problems. I believe you could help change that.
Here's the problem:
By default TB only lists subscribed (LSUB) folders when it accesses an IMAP
server. However when I do
On 20.12.2011, at 22.02, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
On 12/20/2011 2:18 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 19:27 -0800, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
Does doveadm index -A INBOX reindex everything? What about users with
multiple folders, both subbed not subbed under INBOX?
It indexes
On 21.12.2011, at 6.09, Gary Chodos wrote:
We created a new virtual domain and created a user in that domain in
our pgsql database. Instead of creating any directory structure in
/home/virtual/mail/domain/user, I just sent a test email to see if
dovecot's lmtp would autocreate. And it did!
On 21.12.2011, at 8.24, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
That's just the reality of IMAP. LSUB is only useful for grabbing the list
of subscribed mailboxes (I *really* hope TB is not using flags from the LSUB
response for any meaningful purpose - that is simply badly broken behavior).
It does:
38 matches
Mail list logo
