On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:47 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 01:25 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Anyway, it all works spiffingly well, except that I can't see my
inbox
at
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
Well, this wasn't really intentional.. LAYOUT=fs hasn't really been
used much. I'm beginning to think maybe I should change this to be
the
default with it too.
I guess offlineimap-dovecot (serving IMAP)-mail client IS a bit of a
corner case.
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:14 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You're using fs layout, not Maildir++ layout.
Well, I'm obviously much less well-informed on these matters, but from
my POV I was using Evolution (probably one of the more popular
maildir-capable GUI app), and this is the maildir format it
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:14 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You're using fs layout, not Maildir++ layout.
Well, I'm obviously much less well-informed on these matters, but from
my POV I was using Evolution (probably one of the more popular
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nope. Maildir++ is basically the dot-subfoldering and also Maildir++
quota file. Evolution uses neither.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So this LAYOUT=fs is simply for the
Maildir spec, not Maildir++? Or is it some amalgamation that
On Jul 24, 2009, at 2:34 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:28 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Nope. Maildir++ is basically the dot-subfoldering and also Maildir++
quota file. Evolution uses neither.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up. So this LAYOUT=fs is simply for the
Maildir spec,
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 02:45 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You seem to be a bit too much obsessed over Maildir++ :) Maildir++ is
just Courier IMAP's way of storing Maildir folders, which was adopted
by a few other programs. Other programs use more human-understandable
way (LAYOUT=fs).
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and dual P4
Xeon 3,2GHz).
Hi,
dovecot's imap process segfaults when I search a virtual mailbox using
the fts_squat plugin. Is this supposed to work, or a known bug?
I've seen some changes commited to fts_solr a couple of months ago
that where supposed to fix search issues on virtual mailboxes, maybe
fts_squat needs to be
On 7/24/2009 1:47 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
mail_location: maildir:/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root:LAYOUT=fs
Append :INBOX=/home/data/Profiles/OfflineIMAP/root
Hey, thanks, worked perfectly. I just rechecked the wiki, and this is
not mentioned at all, should it be added? The only part of
Joseba Torre schrieb:
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM
Hello,
My exim is doing the deliveries, dovecot handles POP/IMAP.
Exim Log shows:
2009-07-24 14:03:40 1MUJUy-0001Jr-B0 == u...@domain.tu-berlin.de R=maildir_user
T=maildir_delivery defer (2): No such file or directory: while opening or
reading /var/Mail/Boxes/u/user/maildirsize
2009-07-24
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
when they get moved to a different servers, etc.. But is this a real
issue? Maybe not.
I agree to that it is no issue.
Maybe, deliver should get a new option, e.g.:
- -X fake_hostname
Bye.
- --
Joseba Torre wrote:
Hi,
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge 2850 (2GB RAM and
On 19/07/2009 16:03, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 03:48:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt
(t200...@fjl.co.uk) wrote:
Encrypting the whole disk is good if the server gets pinched. My servers
are
behind several layers of hi-tech locks with permanent security guards on
the
door.
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:55 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I have dovecot 1.1.16 running on Solaris 10. We are seeing problem with
lock files taking forever to be removed after opening a email folder
like Trash with several thousand messages in them. We use mbox format.
You mean dotlock files
Hi,
Running OS: CentOS 5.3 (2.6.18-128.2.1.el5)
1.
My Linux distribution comes with Dovecot 1.0.7. After trying to make it
running, I encoutnered many problems. So I decided to upgrade to 1.2.1.
When running dovecot -r from CLI, it returns with version 1.2.1.
But at the top of the log file it
Yes, I'm talking about Trash.lock files, not seeing any errors in the
log files related with lock files.
Yes, I am using dovecot deliver. So does that mean I should not set
mbox_very_dirty_syncs to yes?
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:55 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
I have
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:25 -0600, CJ Keist wrote:
Yes, I'm talking about Trash.lock files, not seeing any errors in the
log files related with lock files.
Can you look at what Dovecot is doing while those .lock files exist? You
can get the process pid from the .lock file and then do:
truss
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 00:07 +0200, FraNL wrote:
Running OS: CentOS 5.3 (2.6.18-128.2.1.el5)
1.
My Linux distribution comes with Dovecot 1.0.7. After trying to make it
running, I encoutnered many problems. So I decided to upgrade to 1.2.1.
When running dovecot -r from CLI, it returns with
Tried that, same result.
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:41 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: Temporary failure in creating login
processes, slowing down for now
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: imap-login: USER environment missing
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:42 Error: imap-login:
On Jul 24, 2009, at 6:58 PM, A. van Harten wrote:
Tried that, same result.
dovecot: Jul 25 00:55:41 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
If it's logging this, it means you have v1.0 binaries around. If rpm -
e dovecot didn't remove it, something else will. I can't really help
you there.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Joseba Torre wrote:
we have a medium setup (8000 pop and imap users using almost every
available client, 800GB of stored mails using maildir on a Celerra NFS
server, with index files on local disks, and procmail for local
delivery), being served by a Dell PowerEdge
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:19 PM, FraNL wrote:
If this message again appear as new message - my apologies, but then
a bit
more info on how to reply on the mailing list would be appreciated.
The problem with the version number is solved.
Not really..
Solution:
1. # rpm -e dovecot
2. Remove
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:55 Info: Dovecot v1.0.7 starting up
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:56 Error: Temporary failure in creating login
processes, slowing down for now
dovecot: Jul 25 01:59:56 Error: imap-login: USER environment missing
The only reason
On Jul 24, 2009, at 8:19 PM, FraNL wrote:
dovecot: Jul 25 02:00:26 Error: POP3(u...@mydomain.tld):
file_dotlock_open() failed with file
/var/mail/vhosts/mydomain.tld/user/dovecot.index.log: Permission
denied
dovecot: Jul 25 02:00:26 Error: POP3(u...@mydomain.tld):
26 matches
Mail list logo
