Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez put forth on 2/20/2010 12:18 AM:
> I used to have the maildirs on ReiserFS and never had a problem with it,
> but given the current state of that FS and that I weren't really
> comfortable with it, I'll give XFS a try for the maildir array and the
> postfix queue partitio
Noel Butler wrote:
Agree wth XFS, providing, and a big providing, you have reliable
and guaranteed power, hard powerouts on XFS are not known for their
niceness and protection of data
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better
than using EXT4 though, why on earth anyone
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 05:23 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:28 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
> > pop3-login[24451]: segfault at 000c rip 003c7de610a2 rsp
> > 7fff07116968 error 4
BTW. I just tried with Nessus, but couldn't reproduce this.
signature.asc
D
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:28 -0600, Todd Rinaldo wrote:
> pop3-login[24451]: segfault at 000c rip 003c7de610a2 rsp
> 7fff07116968 error 4
>
> I'm having a really hard time getting a core dump
Yeah, it's difficult to get login processes to core dump. In v1.2 it's
easier though.
Bugger, hit enter too soon, was going to say, it is probably better than
using EXT4 though, why on earth anyone would use that on a serious
production server I'll never know.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:51 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>
> >
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 17:51 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> If your version of Ubuntu server has XFS support built in, forget ext4 and go
> XFS. It's more reliable, faster in every single benchmark I've seen
> especially
> for large numbers of files, both large and small, has a ton of management
Hi!
On Fre, 2010-02-19 at 17:18 -0600, Rodolfo Gonzalez wrote:
[...]
> This might be a silly question: which would be
Not at all IMHO.
> the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
> storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
> mkfs.ext4 called "news
Rodolfo Gonzalez put forth on 2/19/2010 5:18 PM:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a silly question: which would be
> the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
> storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
> mkfs.ext4 called "news" with inode_ratio = 4096, and
Wayne Thursby put forth on 2/19/2010 3:40 PM:
> Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread, it has been
> very educational.
>
> Since my last post, I have had several meetings, including a conference
> with Dell storage specialists. I have also gathered some metrics to beat
> around.
Hi,
This might be a silly question: which would be
the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++
storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for
mkfs.ext4 called "news" with inode_ratio = 4096, and after formating the
fs with that setting and then with the
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 06:10 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > I certainly wouldn't want to accept a message in this case, user
> > might be 1K under quota, but get 20m file now that might be a
> > whoopie doo :) but what if 130K users did same.
>
> Well, I'd argue that if you're allowing mess
Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread, it has been
very educational.
Since my last post, I have had several meetings, including a conference
with Dell storage specialists. I have also gathered some metrics to beat
around.
The EqualLogic units we are looking at are the baseline
We've been struggling with a problem for the past couple of days which to this
point I've only gotten to be able to boil down to this:
1. Install nessus home edition (less pluggins I assume)
2. run all scans (sequentially or in parallel, doesn't seem to matter)
3. about 3 minutes in /var/log/mess
On 19.2.2010, at 19.56, Brandon Lamb wrote:
>>> I was thinking that I could blog about:
>>
>> I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
>> blogging about. Thanks Timo!
>
> Now where is the "Like" button to this thread
In the blog itself? ;)
(Apparently I should repla
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-02-19 9:20 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> http://blog.dovecot.org/
>>
>> I was thinking that I could blog about:
>
> I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
> blogging about. Thanks Timo!
>
> --
>
> Best reg
Hi,
I was following the earlier namespaces discussion and I would like to
repost a doubt. I need to have some kind of archiving, it means, store old
messages into a cheap storage. But I couldn´t think any other solution
than symlinks.
Then, I thought about store 'Sent Items' (as having old messa
Hello,
I may have missed a point, but I could have found an issue between plugins
quota and lazy_expunge.
I have noticed that the "lazy_expunge"d mails are counted as part of the
quota, while the documentation says it should not be. I have first tried to
find out if this was a configuration mista
On 2010-02-19 9:20 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://blog.dovecot.org/
>
> I was thinking that I could blog about:
I for one will most likely enjoy reading whatever you deem worthy of
blogging about. Thanks Timo!
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2010-02-19 6:33 AM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
> Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
>>
>>> Is this the expected behaviour ?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Thanks for any clarification.
>>
>> The MUA must actively reques
On 19.2.2010, at 17.28, Werner wrote:
> Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
>> On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
>>>
>>> Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
>>
Am 15.02.10 15:18, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On 15.2.2010, at 16.14, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Upgraded from Debian Dovecot 1.0.15 to Debian Dovecot 1.2.10-1~bpo50+1.
>>
>> Problem: Instantly noticed in TB 3.0.1 Win32 that all emails in all folders
>> were marked as unread.
>
> This is a Thunderb
Hi Koenraad,
> What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your
> message. Now it will be available to harvesters, and I will get spam
> via that address very soon. Please don't be offended, but remove
> that from your replies.
Not to a wise ass, but by posting to a list, you'll get y
Nikita Koshikov schreef:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100
Koenraad Lelong wrote:
...
Take a look http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/tips#beh_downloadstartup
Hi Nikita,
Thanks for the link.
What I don't like is that you posted my e-mail-adress in your message.
Now it will be avai
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX
and the currently selected folder ar
imap is the only special case, because there you probably want to use
imap_quota. Everything else is just happy with plain "quota". Actually you
could even put the regular mail_plugins outside protocol {} and only override
it for imap.
On 19.2.2010, at 16.15, maximatt wrote:
> hi...
>
> which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
Is this the expected behaviour ?
Yes.
Thanks for any clarification.
The MUA must actively request the status of the mailfolders. The INBOX and
the currently selected folder are automatically monitor
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:17:17 +0100
Koenraad Lelong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve.
> I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report
> anything that's new in the folders.
> What I mean is this :
> Postfix get's a mail and hands it over to
http://blog.dovecot.org/
I was thinking that I could blog about:
- ideas for new Dovecot feature designs
- when I actually manage to implement some new great feature
- maybe some stuff about IMAP/email in general
- and maybe whenever I happen to be moving to a different country
I wasn't real
Hi,
I have a working dovecot imap-server, with sieve.
I find it odd that my mail-clients (Thunderbird 2 and 3) don't report
anything that's new in the folders.
What I mean is this :
Postfix get's a mail and hands it over to dovecot's LDA and sieve moves
it to a folder.
When I log in with Thund
hi...
which are the diference to configure quota plugin when LDA is dovecot:
these setting:
protocol imap {
:
mail_plugins = quota imap_quota
:
}
protocol pop3 {
:
mail_plugins = quota
:
}
.vs.
thes
Hello,
Call deliver with -d $USER parameter.
puhh, thanks, i got it now.
lda works + all procmail rules.
one thing is left, but i think this is not possible.
our users have full access to procmailparts. if they use procmailrules to
attach mails on folders it its possible to bypass the quoata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
Ahh... so, this would only be a [potential] problem in the case of [a]
user[s] that didn't login for a long time... and I guess you could even
deal with that by some kind of nightly cron job...
A cron job
On 2010-02-19 3:16 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>>> Actually, I once had a system where the request was "we do not
>>> send over quota notices, all mails have to arrive". Hence,
>>> deliver should have no quo
On 2010-02-18 4:53 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>>> Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over
>>> quota at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message,
>>> *regardless* of whether or not it puts the user over quota.
>> Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this behav
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 11:32 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
> best way would be if we could pipe mails from procmail to deliver like
> described here:
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/procmail
>
> but in this case lda ignores my quota and is putting mails in inbox which is
> actual over quota.
> is there a
Hello,
thanks for help.
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:26 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
my user_query:
user_query = SELECT home, uid, gid, concat('*:storage=',
quota_bytes,'M')
AS quota_rule FROM mail_users WHERE login = '%u'
Do you really want quota_bytes number of megabytes? If not, change
the
> > Sure .. but you can break the index files in exactly the same way as
> > with NFS. :)
> >
> That is right :)
For us, all the front end exim servers pass their mail to a single final
delivery server. It was done so that we didn't have all the front end
servers needing to mount the storage. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Actually, I once had a system where the request was "we do not send over
quota notices, all mails have to arrive". Hence, deliver should have no
quota - well,
38 matches
Mail list logo
