I searched on this, but found information only for very very old dovecot
versions, and those answers didn’t quite cover what I am asking.
All my current mail has the ",S=51489,W=52449:” style tag in the Maildir
filename, but I have many messages in Archive mailboxes that have no size
On 08 Dec 2019, at 05:58, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:28, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
>> when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched
>
> I’ve been considering doing this, or at least looking into how much space
> we’d save (answer so far, less than you
On 06 Dec 2019, at 16:28, Martynas Bendorius wrote:
> when zlib compression is enabled in dovecot, old emails remain untouched
I’ve been considering doing this, or at least looking into how much space we’d
save (answer so far, less than you might think), but I am hesitant to “alter”
the user’s
On 04 Dec 2019, at 02:36, Sami Ketola wrote:
> did not notice that you have imap_zlib enabled for protocol imap, can you
> disable that temporarily and re-record the rawlog.
Is it possible that is the source of the issue? It seems like when I tried to
test that it did not work with a lot of
On 28 Nov 2019, at 09:44, Claudio Corvino wrote:
> Just one problem remaining: the e-mail that have l...@domain.tld in BCC could
> not be intercepted by the sieve filter as in the header is not present any
> reference to l...@domain.tld; am I missing something or this cannot be fixed?
The
On 28 Nov 2019, at 00:35, Brent Clark wrote:
> We have in excess of +/- 500 mail boxes and using just under 1TB of disk
> space. That is a lot of small files.
That’s honestly pretty small. When it says "it's not recommended to be used in
multi-million user installations”
You are several orders
On 27 Nov 2019, at 21:51, Jesus Cea wrote:
> tag1 ESEARCH IN (mailboxes "folder1" subtree "folder2") unseen
> tag1 BAD Error in IMAP command ESEARCH: Unknown command (0.001 + 0.000 secs).
This should answer your question, I think.
On 26 Nov 2019, at 04:15, Marc Roos wrote:
> If I do the same test[1] with mbox I can store around 31k messages and
> mdbox 16k messages. I noticed also that cpu and disk utilization with
> mdbox was not very high, while disk utilization on mbox was much higher.
> That makes me wonder if I can
On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:13, Claudio Corvino wrote:
>
Please do not do this.
--
IT DOES NOT SUCK TO BE YOU Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF13
On 23 Nov 2019, at 16:11, Marc Roos wrote:
> It looks like the dovecot proxy can authenticate correctly but fails
> then on with this message
>
> Nov 23 23:33:33 test2 dovecot: pop3-login: Error: proxy: host not given:
> user=, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured,
> session=
>
On 23 Nov 2019, at 15:40, Robert wrote:
> I think you mean collecting all email addresses and connecting them
> (manually) to the correct mailbox in the config of Postfix (or equiv, I have
> no idea what is used at my hosting provider)? That sounds like a doable
> one-time action if all new
On 23 Nov 2019, at 13:50, Robert wrote:
> I do know that sub-addressing with a special character is nowadays a normal,
> better, way to do it.
> Unfortunately we have used this system for a very long time, starting around
> 2005... So there are a lot of existing email addresses.
Then set them
On 22 Nov 2019, at 14:48, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Robert via dovecot:
>
>> We use a simple system for routing emails to different email users by
>> postfixing the addresses with the actual user: xxxJohn@domain;
>> yyyJohn@domain etc all will be delivered to user John.
>> (This way John can
On 16 Nov 2019, at 22:06, Sean Kamath wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 09:46, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>> I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several
>> of them into a mailbox
>>
>> if anyof (header :contains ["to&
> On 16 Nov 2019, at 12:41, Michael Ludwig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm just setting up a new dovecot system and wonder why I get this
> error. On another dovecot system this works with no problems.
>
> Log entry when exiting MUA Thunderbird:
> ===
> Nov 16 20:16:35
I use recipient_delimiter addresseses quiet a bit, and I want to put several of
them into a mailbox
if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ “FOO", “foo", “bar", “florin"]) {
fileinto :create “later";
stop;
}
When I get an email addressed to me+...@example.com or
On 08 Nov 2019, at 11:56, Ken Wright wrote:
> Nov 8 13:28:53 grace dovecot: auth: Fatal: Unknown passdb driver ‘
You do not have Dovecot compiled with support for mysql'
--
Love is like oxygen / You get too much / you get too high / Not enough
and you're gonna die
On 07 Nov 2019, at 23:00, Ken Wright wrote:
> I'm getting an error message saying "user unknown" when I send test
> emails to my server.
You need to look at the logs.
--
Everybody wants a rock to wrap a piece of string around
On 01 Nov 2019, at 16:30, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
> ~/.getmail/log
> =
> 2019-11-01 21:44:20 Delivery error (command deliver 42245 error (127, exec of
> command deliver failed (change UID/GID to vmail/vmail failed ([Errno 1]
> Operation not permitted
Seems pretty clear, get mail is
On 28 Oct 2019, at 08:45, Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> setting ssl_prefer_server_ciphers=yes did the trick. Now my imap client
> uses ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
Now go turn off TLSv1
--
At night when the bars close down
Brandy walks through a silent town
And loves a man who's not
On Oct 12, 2019, at 8:10 AM, johnt...@tulpex.com wrote:
> I run my mail server with no security.
This is extremely foolish and your “reasons” are even more foolish. If you
allow unauthenticated users to send mail from your server then you *will* be
blacklisted, and rightly so.
(For example,
On Oct 11, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> I'm sure you tried this before deleting/re-adding, but just in case not: you
> do have to close out of the settings window (or switch to another account) to
> get the settings to save... it should ask you to save when you do that. If
> you
On Oct 11, 2019, at 2:00 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, @lbutlr wrote:
>
Oct 09 16:02:50 imap-login: Info: Aborted login (auth failed, 5 attempts
in 33 secs): user=, xx.xx.xx.xx, PLAIN, TLS
>>
>> This turns out to have been caused by the MUA attempting to connect to
>>
On Oct 9, 2019, at 5:23 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> First, logins in to check mail and succeeds
>
>> Oct 09 16:02:16 imap-login: Info: Login: user=,
>> xx.xx.xx.xx, PLAIN, TLS
>
> Sends device MUA info
>
>> Oct 09 16:02:16 imap(myu...@covisp.net)<84553>: Info: ID
>> sent: name=iPad Mail,
On Oct 9, 2019, at 5:23 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
> Postfix logs "Client host rejected: Access denied” but as I said, other
> accounts can submit and there’s nothing special in the submission service in
> master.cf.
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o
One of my accounts was having login failures when trying to send mail, but was
able to check mail.
I tried everything I could think of to see what the issue might be, but
eventually went in and reset the password in the sql database (I knew the
password, so I reset it to the same password).
On Sep 26, 2019, at 10:47 PM, dun...@gmail.com wrote:
> Its not down, its most likely your providers DNS resolution.
As I said, multiple connections failed. T-mobile started working about 2 hours
ago, century link soon after. Comcast took longer, but is working now. Each of
these connections
I am not able to reach the dovecot site on any one of three connections (home,
office, mobile).
Trying to look up DNS shows no records.
--
But just because you've seen me on your TV Doesn't mean I'm any more
enlightened than you
On Sep 25, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Joseph Tam wrote:
> you can mulch through mail fairly quickly.
Now there is a good image!
I’m probably going to steal that. Mulch is a word that need more use.
--
I WILL NOT YELL "FIRE" IN A CROWDED CLASSROOM Bart chalkboard Ep. 7G01
On Sep 22, 2019, at 11:20 PM, Plutocrat wrote:
> doveadm sync -u
Did the target machine already have the user setup? I think dsync wants to sync
mailboxes between configured and working servers with users already defined.
--
"Back off, man. I'm a scientist.”
On Sep 22, 2019, at 11:29 PM, Plutocrat wrote:
> This is probably quite an easy question, but I haven't been able to find the
> answer. I'm running a server where all the email addresses are in the format
> "u...@domain.com". I've noticed that a large number of fake login attempts
> use the
On Sep 20, 2019, at 10:38 PM, Plutocrat wrote:
> I recently performed a mail server migration for a client under fairly
> serious time constraints (ahem, yes one of those jobs). I would normally use
> imapsync to get all the mail copied to the new server, but under the
> circumstances, I had
On Sep 12, 2019, at 12:57 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> The next step, I throw the email-incoming-unsorted mbox file at a
> sieve processor, to sort the emails from that mbox, into other
> mboxes, according to the sieve rules file.
I would expect mbox is the worst possible format choice for this.
On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Klaus Steinberger
wrote:
> I never saw any mail system in which the local Part ist Case sensitive!
Every Unix/Linux system (I’d say that represents the majority of mail systems)
has a case sensitive local part. Most mail admins have set their systems up to
On 9 Sep 2019, at 10:08, Francis wrote:
> Where should I look to diagnostic this issue?
Look at the raw stored messages. Your MTA probably has an internal ID (queuid
in postfix) that should tell you if the messages are getting duped before they
get to dovecot.
the raw messages should have
On 9 Sep 2019, at 09:27, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> The moment I remove those folders, the size gets calculated correctly.
> Unfortunately those folders are generated by some clients automatically afaik
> (like .INBOX.Trash)
That sounds like a misconfiguration of the IMAP client. Someone has
On 9 Sep 2019, at 07:47, James Brown wrote:
> Should I use a Dovecot process, rsync, a Mac app like Arq or Jungle Disk, or
> something else?
I do not have specific experience with using S3, but if rsync is possible that
is always my first choice, though if you want to backup to prevent
On 8 Sep 2019, at 12:11, Daniel Miller wrote:
> Seems reasonable. Now, with a non-existent mailbox...
> doveadm mailbox list -u bogus
> returns "bogus"
>
> doveadm mailbox list -u bogus*
> returns ""
>
> Is this a bug or correct behavior?
Seems like a bug. If it is correct IO
On 3 Sep 2019, at 00:32, d.gent...@m4ever.de wrote:
> This is a question about the imap protocol, since I am having a hard time
> finding these things out, so I hope you guys can help me. We are using
> Dovecot to receive mails and having an issue with Thunderbird. ⌘
You and most everyone who
On 4 Sep 2019, at 07:26, @lbutlr wrote:
> with IMAP logging and local rules.
IMAP logins.
--
"640K ought to be enough RAM for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981
On 2 Sep 2019, at 02:08, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Unless you run a big install with lots of accounts where it can be handy to
> use some sort of meta tool (modoboa, postfixadmin, ...) there is zero need
> for an SQL backend.
It is much easier to manage users, even a few users, via a database
On 1 Sep 2019, at 15:53, Michael Hallager wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 06:24, Alexander Dalloz via dovecot wrote:
>> Am 01.09.2019 um 14:41 schrieb Aleksandr Mette via dovecot:
>>> 4. Forward e-mail
>> Don't do that nor let your users auto-forward their mail received on
>> your MX. Else you will end up
On 21 Aug 2019, at 07:12, Kristijan Savic - ratiokontakt GmbH
wrote:
> ssl3
> Any ide what could be causing it?
Old MUAs or bad settings on the MUA. SSLv3 should not be used.
You should NOT try to add support for SSLv3.
--
"Alas, earwax.”
On 16 Aug 19, at 16:57 , @lbutlr wrote:
> Ack. I checked the junk folder and there are 379 files in there with 379
> links!
It appears the main culprit is actually the sieve script that is supposed to
mark messages moved out of the Junk box as ham. Somehow it was getting itself
stuck and
On 17 Aug 19, at 10:14 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Hard links are created when a mail is copied with the IMAP COPY command. So
> Dovecot just does what the client asks it to do. Maybe you have some
> misbehaving IMAP client?
Maybe. Heck, I’ll grant probably, even.
But what do I do about it? How
On 16 Aug 19, at 07:33 , @lbutlr wrote:
> I was looking at a mail folder and I noted that a file in the inbox had a
> total of 11 hard links to it:
Ack. I checked the junk folder and there are 379 files in there with 379 links!
Since they were all in jink I just deleted them all, but that
I was looking at a mail folder and I noted that a file in the inbox had a total
of 11 hard links to it:
# exa -lH cur/1564249738.M167990P53982.mail.covisp.net,S=8572,W=8738:2,Sgl
.rw--- 11 8.6k vpopmail 19 Jul 19:59
cur/1564249738.M167990P53982.mail.covisp.net,S=8572,W=8738:2,Sgl
#
On 13 Aug 19, at 05:58 , James Brown wrote:
>
> b) does Mail.app and other mail clients on Macs or iOS devices perform
> searches on their local copy of mail or does it just send a search request to
> the server?
Mail.app uses spotlight on the local data, so if your users are all Mac then
On 12 Aug 2019, at 00:18, Sami Ketola wrote:
> "1. What's the first mail's saved-timestamp?
> doveadm fetch -u user date.saved mailbox Junk 1
>
> 2. That timestamp should also be the same in dovecot.list.index:
> doveadm mailbox status -u user firstsaved Junk"
>
> can you check that
On 8 Aug 2019, at 13:03, Amir Caspi wrote:
> IMHO the setting should apply regardless of protocol, but is that actually
> the case in practice?
It seems to be broken.
I have
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
autoexpunge = 14 days
When reindexing I go the following error
Mailbox test: UID=1: read(/path/to/mail,S=4248,W=4349) failed: Cached message
size larger than expected (4248 > 1182, box=test, UID=1) (read reason=mail
stream)
In this case, the message was an unimportant test message with no content, so I
simply
Never mind, I figured out my (stupid) error.
> I have a rule in sieve like the following:
>
> if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ "box", "change", "cornell”, “twitter”]) {
--
'My strength is like the strength of ten because my heart is pure,' said
Carrot. 'Really? Well, there's eleven of
I have a rule in sieve like the following:
if anyof (header :contains ["to"] [ "box", "change", "cornell”, “twitter”]) {
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto :create "misc";
stop;
}
The messages that come in are using address extensions, so
user+twit...@example.com, for example.
The trouble is,
On 27 Jul 2019, at 04:15, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> When i migrated the account from the old imap server to the new (dovecot), i
> didn't removed and created the account in msoutlook, as i didn't saw any
> reason to do it.
> Creating the account again, IDLE works ok!
Glad you got that figured out.
On 27 Jul 2019, at 00:42, Patrick Mahan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:44 PM @lbutlr via dovecot
> wrote:
> On 26 Jul 2019, at 09:35, dove...@filter.demeijer.com wrote:
> > I basically followed https://www.c0ffee.net/blog/mail-server-guide/ And
> > dovecot with
On 26 Jul 2019, at 09:35, dove...@filter.demeijer.com wrote:
> I basically followed https://www.c0ffee.net/blog/mail-server-guide/ And
> dovecot with solr is running fine on freebsd for me.
Thanks for that link, looks very straight-forward.
--
Nothing says poor craftsmanship more than wrinkled
> Subject: This is the subject:
> X-Foo: bar
>
> how would I do the following:
>
> 1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject
> Subject: [bar] This is the subject
>
> 2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp
> X-temp: X-foo-bar
Is there a sieve list that might be more appropriate
On 23 Jul 2019, at 08:00, @lbutlr wrote:
> The version of dovecot in freebsd ports tree is still 2.3.6, any idea when
> this will be updated to 2.3.7?
Sorry, please ignore this; brain cloud.
--
I gotta straighten my face This mellow-thighed chick just put my spine
out of place
The version of dovecot in freebsd ports tree is still 2.3.6, any idea when this
will be updated to 2.3.7?
--
"I can't see the point in the theatre. All that sex and violence. I get
enough of that at home. Apart from the sex, of course." - Baldrick
Given a message itht he headers:
Subject: This is the subject:
X-Foo: bar
how would I do the following:
1) Add the contents of X-Foo to subject
Subject: [bar] This is the subject
2) replicate the X-Foo header into X-temp
X-temp: X-foo-bar
--
THE PRESIDENT DID IT IS NOT
On 22 Jul 2019, at 03:45, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 11:50, Jorge Bastos via dovecot
> wrote:
>>> SSL/TLS is done via Stunnel
>
>> Dirst, others have asked but I haven’t seen an answer, do you have any
>> reason to think Outlook supports IMAP idle at all? I mean, I
> On 17 Jul 2019, at 10:03, Trever L. Adams via dovecot
> wrote:
>
>> On 15 Jul 2019, at 18:11, Trever L. Adams via dovecot > > wrote:
>> >
>> So, one of the problems I am seeing is that people are trying to fake
>>
>> >
>> users into revealing information by sending from an outside
On 12 Jul 2019, at 16:15, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> I am looking for something that is similar to replication, but without a
> second server. I currently have a system setup using postfix bcc to write out
> copies of all email, but what I would rather do is just have all the mail
On 15 Jul 2019, at 18:11, Trever L. Adams via dovecot
wrote:
> So, one of the problems I am seeing is that people are trying to fake
> users into revealing information by sending from an outside domain but
> with an internal reply to address and claiming to be administration, IT
> or what not.
On 14 Jul 2019, at 03:35, John via dovecot wrote:
> I'm running an email server (Postfix, Dovecot, MySQL) on an RPi. I set it up
> using this 'howto' https://pestmeester.nl/index.html#11.0. It seemed to work
> but now sent emails just disappear and are not received. Inward emails are
> ok.
On 13 Jul 2019, at 22:57, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky via dovecot
wrote:
> I am not finding how to read SSL keys/certificates from database.
> Is this possible? Or only file reads allowed?
As I read it, only files are allowed.
--
"I'm just like every modern woman trying to have it all. A loving
On 12 Jul 2019, at 16:15, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> I am looking for something that is similar to replication, but without a
> second server. I currently have a system setup using postfix bcc to write out
> copies of all email, but what I would rather do is just have all the mail
I am looking for something that is similar to replication, but without a second
server. I currently have a system setup using postfix bcc to write out copies
of all email, but what I would rather do is just have all the mail written to
/usr/local/virtual/%u/Maildir and also to
is there a way to process a mailbox through an existing sieve script as it the
mail was being delivered anew?
I’ve cleaned up a lot of my list-sorting scripts and I would like to process a
bunch of mail again so it gets sorted properly.
If I can do this could I also do it for a specific date
On 4 Jul 2019, at 03:17, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2019, at 06:38, mabi via dovecot wrote:
>> Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how?
>
> Wouldn’t you then be unable to encrypt previous emails?
UNencrypt, of course.
On 3 Jul 2019, at 06:38, mabi via dovecot wrote:
> Is it possible to delete the inactive keypair? if yes how?
Wouldn’t you then be unable to encrypt previous emails?
On 3 Jul 2019, at 02:55, Peter Kahl via dovecot wrote:
> I failed to disclose that the described problem occurs on iOS 13.0 beta.
>
> After trying again and again, it appears that a bug in iOS 13.0 beta is the
> likely culprit. I am reading on Reddit that there is some bug in iOS with
>
On 3 Jul 2019, at 01:28, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
> On 03/07/2019 04:44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>> I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged.
>>
>>
>> if header :contains "to" "+root" {
>&
I have the following in my active sieve file, and there are no errors logged.
if header :contains "to" "+root" {
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto :create "root";
stop;
}
The message is put in .root, bit is not marked as seen.
Is the default action to put mail in a folder matching the
On Jun 26, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Alexander Varejão via dovecot
wrote:
> I always used dovecot in version 2.0 and in the last month i update my
> servers to dovecot 2.2 but now i have problems with comand dovecot import,
> not works for me, bellow i put 2 examples used in my tests in boths cases
On 24 Jun 2019, at 08:25, Júlio Covolato via dovecot
wrote:
> #$ cat dovecot-last-login.conf
[ … ]
> dovecot.conf:
>
> plugin {
> # Track last login time on imap and pop3
> last_login_dict = proxy::lastlogin
> last_login_key = last-login/%u/%d/%r/%s
> }
Thank you, that is very
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 11:36, Adrian Minta via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> this seems to work very well:
>
> https://docs.iredmail.org/track.user.last.login.html
This is cool, but I have a question:
> For MySQL/MariaDB backends, we create the sql table in database vmail.
Would this interfere
On 21 Jun 2019, at 15:13, David Mehler via dovecot wrote:
> the problem is the last login value does not mean anything to me.
It is standard unix “seconds since the epoch’ and can be converted into any
format you want in any time zone at any time by using the date command.
# date -r 15
On 21 Jun 2019, at 08:40, Germán Herrera via dovecot
wrote:
> I also found out that the AUTH is shown before entering STARTTLS if I set
> "ssl = yes", but the capability is hidden from pre-starttls EHLO if I do
> enforce SSL with "ssl = required", which is my server configuration.
>
> That is
On 20 Jun 2019, at 07:45, Götz Reinicke via dovecot wrote:
> Yes, we are on VMs. Of course I could extend the resources for the dovecot VM
> (more CPU, more RAM) but as mentioned having separate VMs/systems is in some
> situations the preferred way.
Yep, that totally makes sense. I am Old™ and
On 20 Jun 2019, at 07:46, Dave McGuire via dovecot wrote:
> On 6/20/19 6:07 AM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>>> Jun 19 14:47:31 dovecot: [ID 583609 local0.error]
>>> imap(): Error:
>>> mremap_anon(/var/mail///mailboxes/INBOX/Trash/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache,
>
On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:12, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
wrote:
> I agree that is a small mail load.
> But I mean, if you are running virtual machines (like me) it is
> better to split the roles and leave solr on its own.
Oh, right. I thought we were talking about actual hardware separation.
--
On 20 Jun 2019, at 04:14, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote:
> I don't desagree with your vision, but if the use of CRAM- has to use
> plaint text password's on the server there's a dark side, or there's a
> CRAM-XXX that can use encrypted on server side? There's always the thing
> that can
On 19 Jun 2019, at 13:13, Dave McGuire via dovecot wrote:
> Jun 19 14:47:31 dovecot: [ID 583609 local0.error]
> imap(): Error:
> mremap_anon(/var/mail///mailboxes/INBOX/Trash/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache,
> 27632) failed: Not enough space
>
> I'm running 2.2.36.1 under Solaris 10
On 20 Jun 2019, at 02:53, FUSTE Emmanuel via dovecot
wrote:
> There is plenty of context where TLS is not possible/desirable.
I’d say that is terrible advice. There are no reasonable contexts where is it
is acceptable to send mail credentials without encryption. My users have had to
use
On 20 Jun 2019, at 01:21, Riccardo Bicelli via dovecot
wrote:
> ha scritto:
>> what would you suggest? What are the pros and cons for having dovecot and
>> Solr on the same or different hots?
>>
>> I have about 800 accounts, some millions of mails and about 2 TB of zipped
>> mails.
>>
>>
On 19 Jun 2019, at 17:37, Stephan Bosch via dovecot wrote:
> On 20/06/2019 01:20, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>> On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
>>> I don’t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it
>>> is still using a si
On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:03, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
> I don’t see a way to tell dovecot what delimiters to use, and it appears it
> is still using a single delimiter only despite postfix having added support
> for more than one years ago.
Ideas?
--
Lead me not into temptation, I
On 19 Jun 2019, at 16:11, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote:
> root@fastmail:/etc/dovecot# doveconf |grep -i idle
> default_idle_kill = 1 mins
> imap_idle_notify_interval = 2 mins
> imapc_max_idle_time = 29 mins
> mailbox_idle_check_interval = 30 secs
I have:
default_idle_kill = 1 mins
On 19 Jun 2019, at 12:17, Odhiambo Washington via dovecot
wrote:
> I am seeing the following errors in my logs, which I believe are preventing
> Outlook from syncing.
> How do I solve these?
Have you rebuilt the index files?
The simplest and surest way is to stop dovecot, move the index files
On 19 Jun 2019, at 08:33, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> Dovecot uses auth process to collect users, so maybe look at your iterate
> query? https://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/SQL#User_iteration
Yeah, didn’t have one of those. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
iterate_query = select username from mailbox
Seem to
On 19 Jun 2019, at 00:42, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> Your userdb does not support listing, check dovecot logs, the error will
> not be reported by doveadm.
sqlpool(mysql): Query failed, retrying: Table 'postfix.users' doesn't exist
Well, that is true, there is no users table, the table is
On 18 Jun 2019, at 20:46, Adam Raszkiewicz wrote:
> maildir -> mdbox it is maildir to mdbox conversion when I'm looking something
> opposite: mdbox -> maildir
Please go back and read all the words in my previous reply.
--
Lead me not into temptation, I can find the way.
First, I archive the old messages in the INBOX on my list account
# doveadm -Dv move -u krem...@kreme.com Archive mailbox INBOX BEFORE 90d
Debug: Loading modules from directory:
On 18 Jun 2019, at 20:04, Adam Raszkiewicz via dovecot
wrote:
>
> On 6/18/19, 9:59 PM, "dovecot on behalf of @lbutlr via dovecot"
> wrote:
>> On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:18, Benny Pedersen via dovecot
>> wrote:
>> @lbutlr via dovecot skrev den 2019-06-18 23:0
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 16:56, Shaun Johnson via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:41:06 -0600
> "@lbutlr via dovecot" wrote:
>
>> What is the reason for wanting to enable CRAM-MD5? That was intended
>> to use on unsecured connections; you
On 18 Jun 2019, at 16:04, Jorge Bastos via dovecot wrote:
> I'm using dovecot and mysql users, and i'm creating the password with:
>
> ENCRYPT('some-passwd',CONCAT('$6$', SUBSTRING(SHA(RAND()), -16)))
Why not just use the builtin tool in dovecot?
doveadm pw -s SHA256-CRYPT -p
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 15:18, Benny Pedersen via dovecot
> wrote:
>
> @lbutlr via dovecot skrev den 2019-06-18 23:06:
>> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:32, Adam Raszkiewicz via dovecot
>> wrote:
>>> Is there any way to convert Dovecot's mdbox/dbox to mbox, MailDir or e
On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:32, Adam Raszkiewicz via dovecot
wrote:
> Is there any way to convert Dovecot's mdbox/dbox to mbox, MailDir or eml
> format (or any other easy to import format)?
https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
Since many broken websites and idiot companies will not allow a ‘+’ in an email
address, I have long used two delimiters in postfix:
recipient_delimiter = +_
However, now that dovecot is handling verification for postfix via
reject_unverified_recipient, dovecot complains about any address
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
