On 2012-01-12 6:10 PM, Maarten Bezemer mcbdove...@robuust.nl wrote:
Of course I don't know anything about the details of the project (number
of users, requirements for speed of MWI updates, mail storage type,
etc.) but if it's not a very large setup and mail storage is mbox or
maildir, I'd
On 2012-01-12 6:17 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 11.1.2012, at 20.53, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
So now the hard part is writing the piece that I can't just crib from
elsewhere -- making sure that I hook every place in Dovecot that the
user's voicemail folder can be changed in a way
On 2012-01-13 12:11 PM, IVO GELOV (CRM) i...@crm.walltopia.com wrote:
I am aware of the various autoresponder scripts for vacation autoreplies
(I am using Virtual Vacation 3.1 by Mischa Peters).
I have an issue with auto-replies - it is vulnerable to spamming with
forged email address.
I think
On 2012-01-14 12:23 PM, IVO GELOV (CRM) i...@crm.walltopia.com wrote:
I have downloaded the latest version 4.0 - but it seems there is no
way to prevent spammers to use forged email addresses. I decided to
remove the vacation feature from our corporate mail server, because
it actually opens a
On 2012-01-14 3:17 PM, Charles Thompson m...@kinesis.me wrote:
Version information :
root@hostname[/etc/rc.d/rc3.d]# dovecot --version ; dovecot -n ; cat
/etc/*release*
0.99.11
sigh
0.99 is simply way, way, *way* too old to waste any time helping you.
The short answer is - *upgrade* to a
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/nospoof,
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-01-15 7:50 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/nospoof
On 2012-01-15 12:03 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:50 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-15 7:33 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
check_sender_access ${hash}/nospoof,
Oh - if you aren't using variables for the maps paths, just use:
check_sender_access hash:/path/to/map/nospoof
On 2012-01-15 4:50 PM, Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
I don't see how this will help. The scenario the OP is concerned about
isspammer@foreign.domain sends a message with forged From: and maybe
envelope sendervictim@other.foreign.domain to his user on vacation.
Guess I should read more
On 2012-01-16 4:15 AM, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote:
I'm looking through my configuration, and I cannot see a limit on how
many times a single user can connect. He is connecting from different
IPs.
I think you're needing:
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Services#Service_limits
--
Best
On 2012-01-17 9:58 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
Using -a shows you all settings, as they're running in your
installation. That's the defaults, except where they're overwritten by
your config.
I was asking for the defaults regardless of what's in my config file, so
that I
On 2012-01-23 9:41 AM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
On 2012-01-23 14:38, Amira Othman wrote:
And there is no way to receive incoming emails not on port 25 ?
No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Mail_Transfer_Protocol
Well, not precisely correct...
You *could* use a router
On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25 on
request, or might even have an online form you can fill out.
The OP specifically said that *he* had
On 2012-01-24 6:51 AM, Jacek Osiecki jos...@hybrid.pl wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-01-23 11:14 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
If your problem is that your Internet Service Provider is blocking
port 25, you can contact them. Some ISPs will unblock port 25
On 2012-01-24 7:51 AM, Amira Othman a.oth...@cairosource.com wrote:
Thanks for reply
The problem that ISP for some reason port 25 is not stable and refuse
connection for several times so I tried to change port to 587 instead
of 25 to keep sending emails. And I though that I can stop using port
On 2012-01-24 8:39 AM, Noel noeld...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/24/2012 5:23 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
The OP specifically said that *he* had changed the port from 25 to
587...
... because port 25 didn't work.
For *sending*...
And his complaint was that changing the port for the main smtpd
On 2012-01-25 8:34 AM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien jd.beaub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Timo Sirainent...@iki.fi wrote:
Dovecot should already have such cache. If there are problems with that, I
think it would be better to fix it on Dovecot's side rather than adding a
second
On 2012-01-25 3:19 AM, Arun Gupta ar...@cdac.in wrote:
I am using dovecot 2.0.16, and assigend globally procmailrc
(/etc/procmailrc) which delivers mails to user's home directory in
maildir formate. Also I assined quota to User through setquota (edquota)
command, If the quota excedded then this
On 2012-01-25 8:40 PM, Jean-Daniel Beaubien jd.beaub...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd just like to confirm that there is no risk to the actual mail data is
ever something is badly configured when I start dovecot 2.1. I am managing
this old server on my spare time for a friend, so I don't want to loose
On 2012-01-26 8:11 AM, Gedalya geda...@gedalya.net wrote:
As I understand, there is no way an IMAP-to-IAMP process can preserve
UIDs, since new UIDs are assigned for every message by the target server.
Also, imapsync found 0 messages in all mailboxes on my evil
to-be-eliminated server, something
On 2012-01-28 3:24 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 17.1.2012, at 16.23, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
First of all, feature request:
doveconf -d
show the default value of all settings
Done: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.1/rev/41cb0217b7c3
Awesome, thanks Timo!
This makes it
On 2012-02-03 9:38 AM, Przemek Orzechowski wrote:
is there a method to actually prohibit users close to quota to send
emails? Ie defining dovecot as authentication agent?
I wrote about a feature request on this list for something that would
probably easily provide the ability for dovecot to
On 2012-02-06 3:10 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 4.2.2012, at 15.09, Charles Marcus wrote:
snip
This way, you could completely disable the 'Save a copy of Sent
Messages to X folder' option in all mail clients like you can wit
GMail accounts.
Can't you already do
On 2012-02-11 1:46 PM, Gustavo club...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I study the wikki and the dovecot works. But when I try to send a mail
using squirrel, I get this error on logs:
Feb 11 18:41:55 jubileu postfix/smtpd[19522]: connect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Feb 11 18:41:55 jubileu
On 2012-02-12 12:42 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Next up: Creating dovecot-2.2 tree with great new features.:)
Can't wait to read your follow-up email outlining these 'great new
features' you expect to make it into 2.2...
Thanks so much for dovecot Timo! I am amazed at how far it
Hi Timo,
One thing that concerns me right now about my main clients site that I
will soon be migrating from courier-imap to dovecot is the
message/thread a while back about the problems with SIS and backups. I
am trying to decide between using dovecot's SIS, or using mimedefang's
ability to
On 2012-02-12 10:58 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 12.2.2012, at 15.43, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm planning on creating a new backup mail storage backend, where
you could basically run:
doveadm backup -u user@domain backup:
And it would output the user's messages to stdout
On 2012-02-14 10:02 AM, cinzia.delco...@libero.it
cinzia.delco...@libero.it wrote:
I'm writing to alert you that even in version 2.1. we have the error: Can't
handle mixed proxy/non-proxy destinations when we write to two users: one
existent and one not.
why are you accepting mail for non
On 2012-02-20 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Our webmail is configured to read the inbox from /var/spool/mail and
their imap folders from /home or /home/mail.
I can't help with your specific problem, but I do know that having mail
stored directly in /home will cause
On 2012-02-20 1:34 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
On 2/20/2012 1:28 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-20 1:10 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Our webmail is configured to read the inbox from /var/spool/mail and
their imap folders from /home or /home/mail
On 2012-02-23 10:16 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Why is dovecot involved in my smtp processes
Because you told it to?
and how do I fix this.
Depends on what your intent is - what MTA you use - how it is configured
- etc...
I've got some very mad users.
Don't make
On 2012-02-23 11:36 AM, GASPARD Kévin kevingasp...@lavabit.com wrote:
Also my pastes will be destroyed in something like one day, that's
stupid (that's originally for IRC), so this is the output of my :
dovecot -n : http://pastebin.com/Tewcb7bm
telnet : http://pastebin.com/6gY2puxF
netstat
On 23/02/2012 21:41, Marc Perkel wrote:
Not sure how this can be done.
Right now I'm running a free backup MX record service. People point
their high MX records to my servers and if they go down we store the
email. When they come back up it's delivered.
What I want to do is have a premium
On 2012-02-24 9:22 AM, Przemysław.Orzechowski
przemek.orzechow...@makolab.pl wrote:
Im using Dovecot 1.0.10
Very old - an upgrade would likeley fix your problems...
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc.
678.514.6200 x224 | 678.514.6299 fax
On 2012-02-24 10:07 AM, Wilberth Perez wilberth.pe...@uady.mx wrote:
My question was because constantly we received brute force attack from
some of ip address which uses pop3 service to affect dovecot's login
proccess.
This is quickly becoming an FAQ...
If this is linux, and these attacks are
On 2012-02-26 8:11 PM, ml m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
but what the correct value for client limit
in
service auth { client_limit=6000 }
and
service anvil { client_limit=6000 }
Timo already replied that yours should be fine, but I'd just add...
You can now use doveconf -d to see what the
On 2012-02-27 6:06 AM, Nick Warr n...@mobilia.it wrote:
Dovecot is 2.0.beta6 (3156315704ef)
Seriously? You're having problems with an ancient pre-release/beta?
Upgrade to the most recent 2.0, or better yet, 2.1.1 (be sure to read
all of the upgrading docs on the wiki), then try again...
--
On 2012-02-22 8:15 PM, Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
* I've just created an alternative that implements something similar to
the Procmail code you posted above, but from within Sieve itself. It is
a custom language extension called vnd.dovecot.duplicate and it adds the
duplicate
On 2012-02-27 9:24 AM, Nick Warr n...@mobilia.it wrote:
Il 27/02/2012 12.58, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
Upgrade to the most recent 2.0, or better yet, 2.1.1 (be sure to read
all of the upgrading docs on the wiki), then try again...
dovecot --version
2.0.9
Same exact problem.
any
On 2012-02-27 10:10 AM, Nick Warr n...@mobilia.it wrote:
Il 27/02/2012 15.58, Charles Marcus ha scritto:
Update to the *latest* version - for 2.0, that would be 2.0.18, for
2.1, it is 2.1.1
Talk to the CentOS guys for me, and tell em to get on the ball :)
Don't point fingers - this is why
Hello all/Timo,
Up until now, my main Clients office has consisted of a single location,
and I have never had to deal with the situation of multiple locations
for a single company.
They have just told me that they are acquiring an additional floor at a
building that is about 4 minutes away
On 2012-02-27 12:59 PM, Adam Szpakowski a...@3a.pl wrote:
I do have a basic question... How many users will be in this new,
remote location? Will the traffic be so vast, that 1GbE link will not
be enough, or are you using two servers for reliability?
Yeah, I guess I should have mentioned
have many multiple Gb of email, so keeping local
cached copies of all it if is silly, in my opinion... and again, the
*main* purpose for the two separate servers is for high availability
(redundancy/failover)...
--
Best regards,
Charles Marcus
I.T. Director
Media Brokers International, Inc
On 2012-02-27 1:34 PM, Sven Hartge s...@svenhartge.de wrote:
Charles Marcuscmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
Each location is an entire floor of a 6 story building. The remote
location has the capacity for about 60 users, the new location about
100. We only allow IMAP access to email, so if
On 2012-02-27 9:04 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 2.14, Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
However, whenever I run a search thru thunderbird (searching the
from/to/subject/body fields),
I think Thunderbird does this search internally, not via IMAP.
You could test by opening
On 2012-02-28 6:14 AM, Jacek Osiecki jos...@hybrid.pl wrote:
Some IMAP clients (especially outlooks) create junk/sent/etc.
folders with various names, depending on national settings.
Is it possible to provide a - let's say - dictionary, which would always
return the same folder (like Sent) no
On 2012-02-28 8:41 AM, kfx kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Dovecot 2.1.1 and latest solr. Indexing seems ok because the size of the
solr's data directory is growing and log shows things like this:
Feb 28 14:30:45 indexer-worker(username): Info: Indexed 12239 messages
in SubFolder
but thunderbird
On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
snip
Wow, talk about timing... this looks like a perfect answer to my
previous question about setting up two servers in two different
locations to serve two
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now correctly uses server side search?
--
Best regards,
Charles
Hey Timo,
Subject says it all...
This question is a result of an ongoing discussion on the mozilla
enterprise list...
Is there a standard/reliable way for an IMAP client to determine that an
IMAP server supports server side search (with indexes)?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-02-28 11:51 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 28.2.2012, at 18.38, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, okay, actually if server advertises FUZZY extension you can
be quite certain that it supports indexed server side searches.
I meant SEARCH=FUZZY
Thanks for the replies Timo...
Off
On 2012-02-28 9:43 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:27 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-02-28 9:03 AM, Timo Sirainent...@iki.fi wrote:
This document describes a design for a dsync-replicated Dovecot cluster.
snip
Wow, talk about timing... this looks like
On 2012-02-29 9:15 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Q: How many concurrent IMAP clients could you serve with this setup
before hitting a bottleneck at any point in the architecture?
No idea how to calculate it...
What is the first bottleneck you'd run into?
Unless this
On 2012-02-28 11:28 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who was the
problem :(
Sorry for the noise and thank you for dovecot
So... you're saying that Thunderbird now
On 2012-03-02 2:33 AM, D Chen dchen...@yahoo.com wrote:
When ungraded from Ubuntu 11.04 to 11.10, dovecot can't start
successfully with lots of errors i.e. dovecot: doveconf: Warning:
... 'imaps' protocol is no longer necessary, remove it...
At any rate, I want to setup a
On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robin dove...@r.paypc.com wrote:
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderbird usage questions no doubt reflects this.
What precisely about a possible bug with *any* IMAP client when using
dovecot+fts makes you think that
Thanks very much for taking the time for your detailed reply, Stan, but
I'll need more time to study it...
On 2012-03-02 4:17 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
snip
My gut instinct, based on experience and the match, is that a single GbE
inter site MAN link will be plenty,
On 2012-03-04 7:36 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
So, doveconf -n dovecot-new.conf
mv dovecot-new.conf /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
That should do it.
One suggestion... since 'doveconf -n' is sort of a clone of 'postconf
-n', maybe it would be a good idea to clone the postfix way for
On 2012-03-03 4:16 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-02 5:13 PM, Robindove...@r.paypc.com wrote:
This mailing list is for dovecot, not Thunderbird support. The lack of
replies to Thunderbird usage questions no doubt reflects
On 2012-03-04 11:21 AM, Christian Roessner
c...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
The OP showed where *something* was misbehaving - maybe you should
read an entire thread before jumping in?
The bottom line, though, until it can be determined that it *is* a
Thunderbird bug, we won't know if
On 2012-03-04 11:59 AM, Christian Roessner
c...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
you will see that it uses solr. So from my point of view it would be
a Thunderbird thing.
As I said, I would like confirmation *from the OP* about his last
comment that his problem with Thunderbird was
On 2012-03-05 3:43 AM, kada...@gmail.com kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/03/12 13:40, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 2012-02-28 11:28 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2012-02-28 11:05 AM, kfx kada...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok I feel ashame... it was a third party init scrip who
On 2012-02-28 9:57 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
So, Solr in Dovecot works perfectly.
Timo, a follow-up on this...
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox that
applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to show you
only messages in the pane that
On 2012-03-05 9:48 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 13.24, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has a 'Quickfilter Toolbar' with a little searchbox
that applies a filter of the current folder message view pane (to
show you only messages in the pane that meet the criteria
On 2012-03-05 12:01 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 5.3.2012, at 18.12, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thunderbird has an annoying behavior where it sends a new/separate
query each time a character is typed, beginning with the very first
character:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id
On 3/5/2012 1:30 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
I've been looking at some documentation on shared mail accounts.
But I'm getting mixed thoughts on how this can or should be done.
This brings up a question I have been meaning to ask.
One thing I want to do on my new converted system is to implement
On 2012-03-07 1:04 PM, Willie Gillespie wgilles...@es2eng.com wrote:
On 3/7/2012 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
5. No one other than a designated user or users (Master User(s)? Users
in a specified Group?) can delete any messages in this account, in any
of the folders.
If you are using ACLs
On 2012-03-08 4:56 AM, Vincent Schut sc...@sarvision.nl wrote:
The old server was running gentoo linux (which is mainly the culprit of
the old dovecot version: gentoo was too much trouble to keep updating);
Please stop with the FUD...
I've been running gentoo for 8+ years, and it is a
On 2012-03-08 8:53 AM, Vincent Schut sc...@sarvision.nl wrote:
But maybe you also have something useful to say on the questions I *did*
ask? About dovecot versions, and/or maildir vs. dbox for example? As the
subject said, I was seeking advice, not rant nor war...
Yeah, sorry, and I wasn't
On Thu, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:30AM -0500, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:04:14AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
As for what mailbox format, there is no more 'dbox', it is either
sdbox (like mbox one file per folder) or mdbox (multiple files per
folder) -
Sdbox is like
Since you got it working, I'll just comment on a couple of things...
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Troy wrote:
When I do postconf-a it indicates cyrus and dovecot, so I take it that
means Postfix has been built with sasl support. (I presume this means I
don't have to compile it from source.)
On 2012-03-13 6:29 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
I'm going to hope everything is OK for a while, since my goal is to retire
all the old Exchange servers and move all the users to dovecot/maildir
within the next couple of months.
However it's always nice to know there are options.
On 2012-03-14 10:46 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Over the years, some imap accounts had their folders directly in their
home directory and the contents of the .mailboxlist file would have an
entry with just the name of the folder in it (Trash, eg), and most had
the folders in
On 2012-03-14 3:53 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
I'm not sure these are virtual users, so that link may have confused me.
All accounts on these servers have real unix accounts. Their inbox is
/var/spool/mail/unix-user-name.
Doesn't matter, the same thing applies... don't put
On 2012-03-01 8:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Get yourself a qualified network architect. Pay for a full network
traffic analysis. He'll attach sniffers at multiple points in your
network to gather traffic/error/etc data. Then you'll discuss the new
office, which
On 2012-03-14 5:51 PM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
You misunderstood. I was referring to system cronjob's mail reports
from cron.daily jobs like security reports et al. Those reports
normally run at identical times.
But are these really 'duplicate' mails? It sounds to me
On 2012-03-15 9:46 AM, Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
Thus, at 3:01 one report from mx1 will be delivered at mx1 into mailfolder
REPORTS and at 3:01 one report from mx2 will be delivered at mx2 into the
mailfolder REPORTS. Important: both mails are different but they arrive
in
On 2012-03-15 3:27 PM, Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
On 2012-03-15 3:06 PM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.com wrote:
Does anyone know of any manuals/books that have been written that
might introduce me to most of the stuff in dovecot?
I'll be the first to admit that complex and
On 2012-03-16 9:17 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
imaptest is mainly meant to test server correctness (i.e. for me to
test that Dovecot is bugfree). It spends a lot of time checking and
tracking things that is irrelevant when you simply want to load the
server. You could add no_tracking
On 2012-03-16 11:22 AM, Ed W li...@wildgooses.com wrote:
If the answer is that he will write a Z-Push/Activesync module for SOGo
then I'm all ears! I have been watching SOGo for some time and the main
thing I would miss is that every phone I have ever owned has largely
limited/broken Funambol
On 2012-03-18 5:16 AM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Is your problem with the PST files themselves, or merely the fact
they're stored on the local PC, probably in the users' roaming profiles,
thus creating the problem of large data movement during logon/off?
If so, using
On 2012-03-18 11:15 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Only time when the entire mbox file is rewritten is when you
expunge the first message.
Hmmm... wonder if there would be a way to add some kind of 'dummy' first
message that dovecot would simply ignore (not show to the user), that
On 2012-03-20 3:06 AM, evolution age evoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you suggest me any ebook or documentation for the setup of dovecot
with postfix on centos 5.7 . I need it.
Distro specific questions should be directed to your distro support lists.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 2012-03-21 7:48 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 19.3.2012, at 21.16, Alex Ha wrote:
dovecot: auth: Error: BUG: Authentication client gave a PID
7542 of existing connection
Oh, right, PIDs of course aren't unique when you're using
mulitiple servers. Try if the attached patch fixes
On 2012-02-29 9:30 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Morten Stevensmstev...@imt-systems.com:
This is a Fedora-specific problem, because clucene (build
requirement) is not correctly packaged.
Well, debian showed the same packaging (wrong place).
I just attempted to
On 2012-03-24 7:49 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
This is already optionally done in v2.0+dbox. MIME attachments can be
stored in plain binary form if they can be reconstructed back into
their original form. It doesn't break any signed stuff.
Hey Timo,
Splitting this off into a
On 2012-03-24 8:08 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
You can do full backups from a filesystem snapshot, which works
well enough (might leave some unused attachments lying around in
some rare cases, but that can also happen if Dovecot crashes/dies).
But the problem isn't with backups, but
On 2012-03-25 8:53 AM, Luuk@dovecot dove...@vosslamber.nl wrote:
i would also setup a forward from domainA to domainB for all the users
that have moved, at least until most people who do send email know the
'old'address has changed.
I would only do that for a few days at most, otherwise it
On 2012-03-24 9:16 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 14.54, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-03-24 8:08 AM, Timo Sirainent...@iki.fi wrote:
You can do full backups from a filesystem snapshot, which works
well enough (might leave some unused attachments lying around in
some
On 2012-03-27 11:47 AM, Micah Anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
One would be the ability to perform *intelligent* incremental /
rotated backups. I can do this now by running a dsync backup
operation and then doing manual hardlinking or moving of the backup
directories (daily.1, daily.2, weekly.1,
-03-24 9:16 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 24.3.2012, at 14.54, Charles Marcus wrote:
I was also thinking of asking about how to provide read-only access
to these backup snapshots to the users in some kind of special
namespace, so that they could all essentially go 'back in time' to
grab
On 2012-04-02 6:19 AM, Spyros Tsiolis sts...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Is the above what I need if I migrate mailboxes FROM dovecot TO dovecot ?
E.g. in my example, I only copy mailboxes from an old u...@domaina.gr to
u...@domainb.gr.
Is the above all I need ?
Is there a native dovecot tool for this
On 2012-03-31 5:28 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
For the last few days I've been thinking about my company and what it
really should do, and as much as the current plan seems reasonable, I
think in good conscience I really can't help but to bring up an
alternative plan:
The support for
On 2012-04-02 6:51 AM, Spyros Tsiolis sts...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
As far as I can tell everything went well except for one
user (so far) that he tries to move fresh mail to (mv'd)
folders and it doesn't get there.
Also when he tries to delete messages, they don't get
deleted.
I did cp -r actually
On 2012-04-02 8:49 AM, Spyros Tsiolis sts...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On2 April 2012, 12:55, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-04-02 6:51 AM, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
As far as I can tell everything went well except for one
user (so far) that he tries to move fresh mail to (mv'd)
folders and it doesn't get
On 2012-04-02 7:15 PM, Micah Anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
Charles Marcuscmar...@media-brokers.com writes:
On 2012-03-27 11:47 AM, Micah Andersonmi...@riseup.net wrote:
One would be the ability to perform *intelligent* incremental /
rotated backups. I can do this now by running a dsync
On 2012-04-05 4:18 AM, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
Also with 2.x you may want to use LMTP rather than the LDA Piping.
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixDovecotLMTP
I am preparing to convert my main client's postfix_courier-imap setup to
dovecot 2.1, which currently just uses
Hi all,
I'm planning on implementing this in my new upcoming dovecot instance,
and would like to hear thoughts on how best to accomplish this. We will
be paying Timo's support company to do the work, but obviously, the less
work in the form of coding he has to do to get this working (I'm
On 2012-04-05 12:37 PM, Tom Hendrikx t...@whyscream.net wrote:
The first interesting point I'd see with this, is that you supply the
mail client with a near endless supply of folders, which would take a
lot of caching space on the clients end, either (depending on the client
and its
On 2012-04-06 2:53 PM, Daniel L. Miller dmil...@amfes.com wrote:
I'm currently using Postfix 2.7, Dovecot 2.1, and the Dovecot LDA. I
have a pure virtual user environment stored in LDAP. My messages include
X-Original-To and Delivered-To headers.
Well that is great news... at least I'll be
1 - 100 of 1922 matches
Mail list logo
