On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:51:18AM -0700, terryjames9...@mm.st wrote:
I'm a little confused about: to do that sharing-in-one-place, do I have
to use SQL or can I use the flatfiles like passwd-db? I think for sure
someone already decided the best approach for this, and maybe I'm not
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:09:02PM +0100, mailing lists wrote:
Hello all,
today I got this crash from dovecot (2.0.14)
FYI: You're not alone..
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-September/060830.html
I seem to remember thinking this probably was caused by too short
IMHO it would be great if we could both provision and un-provision users
without having the provisioning system mess with files in the
filesystem. Provisioning new users works fine since dovecot will create
all files/directories on first login, but I haven´t found the tools to
un-provison them. I
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 10:41:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:57 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
IMHO it would be great if we could both provision and un-provision users
without having the provisioning system mess with files in the
filesystem. Provisioning new
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Peer Heinlein wrote:
I have 11 TB hard used Mailstorage, saved als maildir in ext3 on
HP EVA.
You have 11 TB of mails on a non cluster filesystem?
Yes.
I don't believe a clustered filesystem would have more performance and
would be
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 03:30:07PM -0600, Andy Robbins wrote:
We are currently experiencing performance issue with our Dovecot system
which we believe is caused by excessive writes to the dovecot files. The
confusing thing is that we are seeing more writes than reads on our Dovecot
volume when
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:45:49PM +0100, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 19:40 +0100, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
I already use lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp as transport but where is
the link to the indexes?
You can switch to lmtp:tcp:1.2.3.4:24 where
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
No. I want to know if dovecot writes to the indexes if it receives a
mail via lmtp.
Someone proposed to store the index files on a locally installed SSD
on a frontend (imap) machine and stick the users to that machine but
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:38:43PM +0100, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
Jan-Frode Myklebust schrieb:
MTA -(lmtp)-- dovecot-director ---(lmtp)--- backend-server1
\---(lmtp)--- backend-server2
IMAP-user -(imap)-- dovecot-director --(imap) -- backend
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:35:55PM +0100, Patrick Westenberg wrote:
- What happens if the MTA accepted a message but the backend-server
fails and is unable to store it?
Your MTA will be notified about the failure trough SMTP/LMTP error
codes, and retry if it was a temp-failure.
- What about
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:25:47PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I'm not sure if changing /etc/security/limits.conf helps. It's probably
only used by PAM when user logs in, so if Dovecot is started in system
bootup it's unlikely to have been even read yet. Also I think some OSes
override the
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:26:54PM +0100, Xavier Pons wrote:
Hi, we are getting some core dumps with signal 6 in ltmp on a
dovecot director proxy server, like this:
http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2011-September/060830.html
I have a strange problems with quota on v2.0.14. We have an ldap user
directory, and all users should have a mailQuota defined there. My
problem is that some users gets the quota enforced, while others don't,
and doveadm user doesn't seem to agree with doveadm quota ge gett
Ref:
$
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:50:32PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 5.12.2011, at 21.14, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
userdb: janfr...@example.net
home : /usr/local/atmail/users/j/a/janfr...@example.net
mailQuota : quota_rule=*:storage=210
it should say
Changes in SOGo is forcing me to define a master user, so that SOGo can
disable sieve out-of-office processing on a given date. I'm not too
happy about having master users that are allowed to read the users
messages, so is it possible to define a master user that can only log in
trough
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 12:32:21PM +0100, Stephan Bosch wrote:
However, I do have a suggestion for a different approach. You can
define a vacation response action with an expiry date, as follows:
require [date, relational, vacation];
if currentdate :value le date 2011-12-09 {
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:25:14PM +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
Thanks, we considered options, ruled out master-master for security, and
since everything is with mysql (AAA) we decided not to introduce another
database type,
But LDAP master-master is sooo nice :-) and once you have your users in
I've just enabled zlib for our users, and am looking at how to compress
the existing files. The routine for doing this at
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib seems a bit complicated. What do
you think about simply doing:
find /var/vmail -type f -name *,S=* -mtime +1 -exec gzip -S Z -6
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:56:33PM -0800, Dovecot-GDH wrote:
The cleanest (though not necessarily simplest) way to go about this would be
to use dsync to create a new maildir and incrementally direct traffic to a
separate Dovecot instance.
Unless you have a legacy application that relies
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:10:20PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
With mdbox the internal separator is '/', but it's not valid to have INBOX.
prefix then (it should be INBOX/).
But how should this be handled in the migration phase from maildir to
mdbox then? Can we have different namespaces for
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 02:55:40PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I.e. find all maildir-files:
- with size in the name (*,S=*)
- modified before I enabled zlib plugin
As long as it doesn't find any already compressed mails..
Can't I trust that no mails with timestamp before I
Guess I don't quite get namespaces, but we have the following namespace
configured:
$ doveconf namespace
namespace {
hidden = no
inbox = yes
list = yes
location =
prefix = INBOX.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 03:49:57PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
With mdbox the internal separator is '/', but it's not valid to have
INBOX. prefix then (it should be INBOX/).
But how should this be handled in the migration phase from maildir to
mdbox then? Can we have different
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 08:59:35PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
Slightly different, but it would be good to have a persistently
running daemon which could operate both in server and client mode.
In server mode it would listen on a TCP socket. In client mode it
would accept source and target
We have last-login tracking for imap and pop, and I intend to use this
for deciding which users to backup daily. But, it would also be nice to
backup users who has only received messages, but not logged in lately..
So is it possible to implement last-login tracking for lmtp ?
I naively tried
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:03:34PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
LMTP supports authentication, but Dovecot doesn't support it. And you most
likely didn't mean that anyway.
Yes, I know..
So, when would it be executed? When client connects? After each RCPT TO?
After DATA?
For my async
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:00:03AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
We just got rid of the legacy app that worked directly against the
maildirs, which is the reason we now can turn on compression. I
intend to switch to mdbox, but first I need to free up some disks by
compressing the existing
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 06:38:28PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Roger that. Good strategy. You using SAN storage or local RAID? What
filesystem do you plan to use for the new mailbox location? What OS is
the Dovecot host?
IBM DS4800 SAN-storage. Filesystem is IBM GPFS, which stripe all
I'm in the processes of running our first dsync backup of all users
(from maildir to mdbox on remote server), and one problem I'm hitting
that dsync will work fine on first run for some users, and then
reliably fail whenever I try a new run:
$ sudo dsync -u janfr...@example.net backup
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:51:00AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
dovecot -n output? What are you using for the namespace hierarchy separator?
I have the folder format default separator (maildir .), but still dovecot
creates
directories named .a.b.
On receiving dsync server
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 01:54:32AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Nice setup. I've mentioned GPFS for cluster use on this list before,
but I think you're the only operator to confirm using it. I'm sure
others would be interested in hearing of your first hand experience:
pros, cons, performance,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:00:08PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So here on source you have namespace separator '.' and in destination
you have separator '/'? Maybe that's the problem? Try with both having
'.' separator.
I added this namespace on the destination:
namespace {
inbox = yes
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:34:59PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 13:12 +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
dsync-remote(janfr...@tanso.net): Error: Can't delete mailbox directory
INBOX.a: Mailbox has children, delete them first
Oh, this happens only with dsync backup
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:09:39AM -0600, l...@airstreamcomm.net wrote:
Could you remark on GPFS services hosting mail storage over a WAN between
two geographically separated data centers?
I haven't tried that, but know the theory quite well. There are 2 or 3 options:
1 - shared SAN
Out of curiosity how did you handle the courierimapsubscribed and
courierimapuiddb file name differences? Did you just rename them?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Richard G Riley
Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2008 13:30
Aan
That's actually quite a lot.
Consider you run 100k+ mailboxes (1GB each) and you would move to
Dovecot this will be a huge chunk out of your storage.
Is using dovecot index files really that much faster than running
:INDEX=MEMORY ? Where could I find some benchmarks about this?
Cheers,
Jan
Thanks for the replies this cleared up a lot.
Right I think I will be using Dovecot for IMAP (less clients) with index
files and keep on using Courier for POP3 (most clients). According to my
tests this works OK on the same mailbox.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo
Herve probably uses the default Etch package.
I don't know who maintains the package: but it certainly is old.
Regards,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Charles Marcus
Verzonden: dinsdag 12 februari 2008 13:35
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC
# Enable mail process debugging. This can help you figure out why Dovecot
# isn't finding your mails.
mail_debug = yes
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Carsten Henkel
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 februari 2008 20:49
Aan: dovecot
Before you start Dovecot type this in you shell:
ulimit -n 65000
I don't know how the use of the 'unlimited' word works: maybe this is
only 1024?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Ralf Hildebrandt
Verzonden: maandag 25
(default): sql(***, ***):
MD5-CRYPT(0lifant) != 'i3/S6ZswGSfbk'
Any way to make Dovecot use another (fallback) password scheme when the
default scheme isn't working?
Cheers,
Jan
CRYPT and MD5-CRYPT are compatible in pretty much all operating systems.
You could just make CRYPT your default password scheme and it'll work
for both.
I did not know that. But it works!
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Timo Sirainen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden
(with indexes and auth_cache) performs
much faster and puts less load on our frontends and webmail app.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Timo Sirainen
Verzonden: donderdag 28 februari 2008 18:49
Aan: Andy Dills
CC: dovecot@dovecot.org
as webmail app.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Charles Marcus
Verzonden: vrijdag 29 februari 2008 11:41
Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot NFS Indexes and IMAP Migration
Jan van den Berg, on 2/29/2008
Hi,
I'm fresh starting to use dovecot.
Before this I used bincimap, mainly because it was very simple to config.
I've tried to find the FAQ's and tried searching the archives, but little came
up.
My current config:
server
FreeBSD i386, postfix 2.4
dovecot 1.0.10
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mar 4, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
However I have over 3500 folders and most of them are more than 3
levels deep.
And I only get to see the first top level of directories.
Searching and/or subscribing does not bring anything.
Are they stored
emails will still get marked.
This only seems to happen with Outlook 2003 not with Outlook Express or
Thunderbird and only with new unread mail.
Any ideas why Outlook marks this mail for deletion?
Cheers,
Jan
settings.
What is so specific about Dovecot that this happens? Could it be that
Dovecot and Outlook have a certain negotiation about this. Outlook sends
a message to Dovecot about a Junk email and Dovecot then moves this. Can
this be confirmed? Can I look for this 'negotiation' in strace?
Cheers,
Jan
in the main config I use:
mail_plugins: quota imap_quota
plugin:
quota: maildir
So I use maildir:storage in my config. However when I delete the
maildirsize (for testing purposes) it doesn't get automatically
recreated? According to the Wiki it should right?
Cheers,
Jan
): Quota root QUOTA: Invalid
rule: maildir:storage=10M:ignore=Spam e-mail
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Jan van den Berg
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 13:40
Aan: Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: [Dovecot] Maildirsize
Of course the rule is wrong:
:ignore=Spam\ e\-mail shouldn't be in there.
I fixed it.
But still; why isn't the maildirsize being recreated when it's not
there?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Jan van den Berg
Verzonden
and are there any workarounds available?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jan van den Berg
Verzonden: maandag 10 maart 2008 14:53
Aan: Jan van den Berg; Dovecot Mailing List
Onderwerp: RE: [Dovecot] Maildirsize automatically (re)build
Of course the rule is wrong:
:ignore=Spam\ e
Wow,
Formulating the problem for the maillist really helps my find the answer
myself :)
quota_rule=maildir:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
should be
quota_rule=*:storage=10M
quota_rule2=Trash:storage=8M
Now it works!
(Also maildirsize gets created automatically now).
Cheers,
Jan
not the
only user).
Cheers,
Jan
. to debug.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Patrick Nagel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:01
Aan: Jan van den Berg
CC: 'Dovecot Mailing List'
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + getting new
headers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
not sure what to look for in these files.
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Jan
van den Berg
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 11:23
Aan: 'Dovecot Mailing List'
CC: 'Patrick Nagel'
Onderwerp: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003
Hi,
Well I enabled verbose debugs and all but there isn't anything interesting
in those logs...
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Patrick Nagel
Verzonden: woensdag 10 september 2008 12:17
Aan: Jan van den Berg
CC: 'Dovecot
FETCH 1667 (UID FLAGS BODY.PEEK[] INTERNALDATE)
znim IDLE
DONE
4ogq UID FETCH 1668 (UID FLAGS BODY.PEEK[] INTERNALDATE)
5131 IDLE
How should I interpret this? I see 1668 and 1667?
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Timo Sirainen
I've been following this thread: the bug is related with copying mail across
NFS in combination with cache locking, right?
Cor uses FBSD; but is this a bug that might impact other platforms as well?
Cheers,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Cor Bosman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dovecot
: but should I
be worried and what is it?
Cheers,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Jan van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Dovecot Mailing List' dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Outlook 2003 and Thunderbird IMAP + gettingnew
headers
getting new
headers for a folder I can see the dovecot.index files and uidlist are
recreated and a couple .nfs* files are in the dir
However I can't explain it (all NFS related Dovecot optimizations are on).
Cheers,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED
I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I
will get back to that.
I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it
of any use
Thanks,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan van den Berg [EMAIL
I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I
will get back to that.
I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it
of any use
Thanks,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan van den Berg [EMAIL
I can get those files next Monday without problem and compare them. So I
will get back to that.
I also posted some part of the rawlog earlier in the thread; dont know if it
of any use
Thanks,
Jan
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan van den Berg [EMAIL
I was gonna get back on this.
Short answer: it's pretty much solved.
Long answer: there was indeed a cron that did 'something' with the
dovecot-uidlist files. It didn't touch the cache files or anything. I
disabled this script and now everything works fine...
Cheers,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk
It's long over due, but now I finally plan on upgrading from v1.0.15 to
v1.2.16 on our servers. Would appreciate any comments!
We have 7 servers, all running of the same GPFS filesystem. Both
maildirs and indexes are stored here. We use dovecot for POP/IMAP and
deliver. Currently we're using
I plan on putting two dovecot directors in front of our backend dovecot
pop/imap servers, instead of our current haproxy loadbalancing of the
connections -- but how do we handle SSL in such a setup. Will all SSL be
terminated on the directors automatically, and then proxyed plain text,
or is there
Never mind -- I see now that this is working fine by default. SSL
is terminated on the director, and connections are automatically
proxyed in plain text.
Still wonder a little about v2.0 director vs. v1.2 backends, but doubt it
should matter much..
Complete (single-node) director configuration,
To store the messages safely/safeish, I think you will have to use
public key cypto. Messages delivered should be encrypted with the user's
public key on delivery, and decrypted by combination of the user's server
side stored secret key and login passphrase. The secret key probably also
would
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:35:42AM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You could have upgraded from v1.0 to v1.1 or v1.1 to v1.2 incrementally,
but v1.2's index changes haven't been backported to v1.0, so if v1.0
accesses indexes modified by v1.2 you'll probably get some errors.
I think we'll just
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:44:26PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
user_attrs =
mailMessageStore=mail=maildir:%$:INDEX=/usr/local/atmail/users/indexes/%1u/%1.1u/%u,
mailQuota=quota_rule=*:storage=%$
i.e. will it point dovecot at:
mail =
maildir:/usr/local
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:37:47PM +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You don't have
plugin {
quota=maildir
}
We didn't have any plugin-setting for this with v1.0, and it wasn't
obvious to me that we also needed this plugin-definition in addition to
the quota_rule string per user. Works now
Some filesystems are quite slow at deleting files, so I'm wondering if
anybody is using the lazy expunge plugin to implement a solution where
expunged messages are moved to a separate directory structure within the
same filesystem, and later deleted as a nighly batchjob ? Assuming expunge
FYI it seems dovecot 2.0.8 fails to start on RHEL5 with IPv6 disabled
(alias net-pf-10 off in modprobe.conf) unless one specify listen = *.
Not sure if this is a known problem, or just a hint that we should start
enabling ipv6 on our mailservers... ;-)
-jf
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:02:12PM +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
FYI it seems dovecot 2.0.8 fails to start on RHEL5 with IPv6 disabled
(alias net-pf-10 off in modprobe.conf) unless one specify listen = *.
i.e., without listen = * it complains:
Error: service(pop3-login): listen
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:05:29PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
This still doesn't work, because the administrator is the one who tells
the system to encrypt messages as they arrive. He can peek at the
messages before they're encrypted with the user's public key.
That's a small window
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:19:39PM +0100, Egbert Jan van den Bussche wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to find inactive users.
What we do is to touch a file upon every login:
protocol imap {
snip
mail_executable = /usr/local/dovecot/sbin/imap-wrapper.sh
}
protocol pop3
On 2009-01-06, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
I already asked on IRC whether this was possible, because I was unable
to find this on the Wiki. It turns out there is a configuration switch
called `disable_plaintext_auth', but looking at the description this
only prevents people from using
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:25:46AM -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
Dunno if I'm talking about the right thing or if this would help, but...
we have gone over to a single wildcard certficate for everything in the
*.bard.edu domain (from Digicert)...this costs $495 for a single year,
less
We recently upgraded to dovecot v1.0.15 (from v1.0.0 + some local fixes),
and after this upgrade we've started to get a couple of failures from deliver:
Jan 12 20:34:34 smtp1.ulh.mydomain.net deliver(someu...@somedomain.net): Raw
backtrace:
/usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:46:35AM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Before this raw backtrace there should have been a Panic: Something
logged also. That's more important than the raw backtrace.
I can't find that in the syslog. But I found this just before the
backtrace:
deliver(someu
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:46:04PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Reading your old mails: are you still using GPFS? This crash just
shouldn't be happening, so perhaps something randomly breaks with it.
Are you using mmap_disable=yes? Multiple servers can access the same
user's mails at the same
We're looking at replacing our mysql auth and userdb, with a
set of Red Hat Directory servers, and I see dovecot supports
either authentication binds, or password lookups:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/AuthDatabase/LDAP
I'm curious if anybody can give any insight as to what kind of
performance to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:43:51PM -0500, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Try yourself with imaptest (http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest):
imaptest - select=0 clients=try different values
Cool, thanks!
My guess is that the performance bottleneck won't be authentication
binds, as long as the latency
tried setting mmap_disable=yes today, but got two new failures 2.5
hours later :-(
Jan 20 10:38:32 smtp2.ulh.myinternaldomain.net
deliver(quarant...@mydomain.net): Raw backtrace:
/usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver(i_syslog_panic_handler+0x1c)
[0x45577c] - /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot
On 2009-01-20, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
I tried setting mmap_disable=yes today, but got two new failures 2.5
hours later :-(
I check the logs for the last failure, and see that at the
same second two servers were trying to deliver separate messages
to the same account
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:02:23 +0100
Angel Marin an...@anmar.eu.org wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 2-9-2009 8:07 PM Linux Advocate spake the following:
guys , i m new to centos. i have learned to use yum and the
priority plugin. Does the atrpm repo provide the most up to date
version of
I'm considering putting two servers with failover IP-addresses in
front of our pop/imap cluster, with dovecot in proxy-mode running
on both servers. But, can dovecot handle more than one backend
server for each user ?
I.e. I would want to point the dovecot proxy to send userX to
backend-server1,
On 2009-03-09, Justin Krejci jkre...@usinternet.com wrote:
I don't believe there is anything inherent in Dovecot to do this but if you
have your own backend system health checks you can configure the sql DB to
update which server to proxy a request to based on the results of your
health
I'm preparing to set up a new set of directors on
dovecot-ee-2.1.10.3-1, but would prefer to do this a bit gradually.
Will it be OK to set up a ring of directors with 2x
dovecot-ee-2.1.10.3-1 and 2x dovecot-2.0.14 ?
-jf
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
The new v2.1 director code can handle running with old v2.1 directors (there
were some protocol changes that improve things). I think v2.0 director is
protocol compatible with the old v2.1 directors, so I think in theory it
messages to dovecot using
scripts like imapcopy, etc.
Perhaps using the proxy functionality..?
Hope I make myself clear...?
Regards,
Mourik Jan
Hi Daniel, list,
Thanks for your answer, if this works, it would be simply awesome!
Meanwhile things have gotten a bit buzy here with higer priority things,
but as soon as these are over, I'll give the idea below a try.
Thanks very much, and I'll report back..!
Mourik Jan
I would try
: user username: Initialization failed: Namespace
'oldmail/': imapc: missing imapc_password
How can I get the %w to expand properly, because I think then things
would work...?
Regards,
Mourik Jan
I would try to create a private namespace oldmail
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Namespaces
it,
and proceed as normal.
Thanks very much for you kind assistance!
Mourik Jan
and assistance!
Mourik Jan
We upgraded our two dovecot directors from v2.0.14 to dovecot-ee
2.1.10.3 this week, and after that mail seems to be flowing a lot
slower than before. The backend mailstores are untouched, on v2.0.14
still. After the upgrade we've been hitting process_limit for lmtp a
lot, and we're struggeling
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 1.2.2013, at 19.00, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
Have you checked if there's an increase in disk I/O usage, or system cpu
usage?
On the directors, cpu usage, and load averages seems to have gone down
I think there must be some bug I'm hitting here. One of my directors
is still running with client_limit = 1, process_limit = 100 for the
lmtp service, and now it's logging:
master: Warning: service(lmtp): process_limit (100) reached, client
connections are being dropped
Checking sudo netstat
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:59:52PM +0100, Pavel Dimow wrote:
we have /var/spool/vmail/mydomain.com/u...@mydomain.com and I want a
new server with version 2 to have
hashed directory structure like /var/spool/vmail/mydomain.com/u/s/user
I was wondering it f there is some better solution then
201 - 300 of 414 matches
Mail list logo
