On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 05:42, Peter via dovecot wrote:
>
> On 17/04/24 00:51, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
> >> "Peter" == Peter via dovecot writes:
> >
> >> On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
> >>> I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
> >>>
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, 23:25 Michael Peddemors, wrote:
There is a network claiming to be a security company, however the
activity appears to be a little more malicious, and appears to be
attempting buffer overflows against POP-SSL services.. (and other
attacks).
On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 20:40, Michael Slusarz via dovecot
wrote:
>
> > On 07/18/2023 9:00 AM MDT Gerald Galster wrote:
> >
> > While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this
> > is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability
> > deployments.
>
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 06:47, Michael Slusarz via dovecot
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I want to provide a brief overview regarding various questions surrounding
> features that are being removed from Dovecot CE going forward.
>
> We are currently working on providing updated/improved website info
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 12:58, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet Services
Inc.) wrote:
>
>
> ok u...@domain.com needs to exist before any operations can be done on it.
>
> I discovered that dovecot does not consider a virtual mailbox active
> until it is returned in the user database
>
> see : doveadm
On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 18:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> Dnia 18.09.2022 o godz. 10:09:34 Stuart Henderson pisze:
> >
> > The CA/Browser Forum baseline requirements say that certificates must
> > include subjectAlternativeName. This doesn't strictly apply to non-browser
> > applications but it
On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 12:53, Goetz Schultz
wrote:
>
>
> On 18/09/2022 11:09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022-09-14, Goetz Schultz wrote:
> >> I had the same issue on TB102. Self-Signed certificates rejected despite
> >> having the CA installed correctly as authority. Turns out out that
Hallo again.
Dovecot is not doing a look up for the MailDirLoc in the mysql database
after postfix hands over the mail to dovecot-lda.
Postfix knows the right location
# postmap -q u...@domain.net mysql:/etc/postfix/Mail-Mailbox.cf
domain.com/user/
But apparently this has not worked as
I have a production Dovecot problem and although I searched the mailing
lists, I could not find an answer and I hope you can give me a quick
answer/pointer in the right direction.
I have mails for a user (u...@domain.net) under /var/spool/mail/virtual/
domain.net/user and I want to move ALL the
On 8 Oct 2013 07:50, Wouter Berkepeis wou...@private-lotus.org wrote:
Hello Benny,
Thanks for your response. Ingo looks promising to me as a sufficient
solution, but on the Ingo site one of the stated prerequisites is :
(start quote)
To function properly, Ingo *requires* the following:
On 24 Jul 2013 09:44, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 24.07.2013 09:21, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
Reindl, keep this kind of crap off the list. It benefits nobody here
and simply wastes resources. Either send it off list, or better yet,
don't sent it at all. You got yourself
Hi
I recently moved to Debian Wheezy and installed dovecot from apt-get.
root@mail:~# dpkg -l | grep dovecot
ii dovecot-common 1:2.1.7-7
all Transitional package for dovecot
ii dovecot-core 1:2.1.7-7
amd64secure mail server that
On 1 July 2013 11:32, Thomas Leuxner t...@leuxner.net wrote:
* Simon B simon.buongio...@gmail.com 2013.07.01 10:41:
/var/log/mail.log.1:42896:Jun 30 17:27:34 mail dovecot: imap: Server
shutting down. in=1764 out=4027
What does the preceding line for the master process say?
Jun 29 11:39:24
On 14 Jun 2013 23:01, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 14.06.2013 22:10, schrieb Ajai Khattri:
One small problem (I should have described better): the old server is
not available but I've have the maildirs
rsynced to the new server. So I have the actual message files but I'm
Hi
I've upgraded to 2.1.7 and finally decided to turn off imaps and pop3s
because these days everyone uses tls over 143 anyway. But it's on and
I can't figure out why.
I only have non-ssl versions specified:
protocols = imap pop3
I've stopped and started and the ports are still open and
Thanks everyone :) You'd think I could have found that on Google!
Simon
On 13 June 2013 16:56, InuSasha i...@inusasha.de wrote:
Hi Simon,
Try to add this configuration.
The Port = 0 will disable the listener.
Greats,
Sascha Kuehndel
service imap-login {
inet_listener imap {
On 3 Jun 2013 16:49, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 06:23:09AM -0700, dd wrote:
5 hours of configuration attempts, error after confusing error,
documentation with examples that only show extracts of working
configurations. I really feel like throwing in the towel
On 24 May 2013 20:08, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Simon B skrev den 2013-05-24 18:32:
In an unscheduled maintenance window next week, I will have the
opportunity to upgrade to 2.x should I wish to do and provided I can
get it working on stage first.
+1, i would have installed 2.x
Hi
In an unscheduled maintenance window next week, I will have the
opportunity to upgrade to 2.x should I wish to do and provided I can
get it working on stage first.
My questions:
I've seen a lot on the list about the rock-solidness of 1.2 but also
some people saying that some versions of 2.x
19 matches
Mail list logo
