-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Aug 08 23:22:58 Info: cmusieve: Using sieve
path: /var/vmail/[EMAIL PROTECTED]//.dovecot.sieve
deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Aug 08 23:22:58 Info: cmusieve: Executing
script
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
As a long-time Debian user, I'd really rather not patch anything. :)
Um, I couldn't stand this policy while waiting for Sarge.
But yes, if dovecot's LDA would honour something like .forward
files, I'd
Hi Timo,
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
Here's how it looks like if we issued a FETCH 40 FULL:
* 40 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE 09-Aug-2007 11:50:44 +0800
RFC822.SIZE 803392
ENVELOPE (Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:09:09 +0800 (CST)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder. I'm not
really sure, if this is the solution i'd like to have.
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 21:19 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
dovecot: Aug 08 18:50:11 Error: IMAP(anne): Ambiguous mail location
setting, don't know what to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Ganschow schrieb:
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
Dovecot-LDA is using _one_ script, when there is an user Sieve script,
the global one is _not_ used.
Okay now it works.
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/alpha/dovecot-1.1.alpha2.tar.gz.sig
Hopefully the next release can be v1.1.beta1. I'm not aware of any major
problems and I think I'm pretty much done with new features (except
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 21:19 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Aug 2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
dovecot: Aug 08 18:50:11 Error: IMAP(anne): Ambiguous mail
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 10:01 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Sebastian Ganschow wrote:
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder.
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:32 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new RHEL5 system and am having
trouble getting the UIDLs to move over right, mainly the UID.
I copy over the mailbox, and see the x-uid in the message is what it was
on the old server, but when
Le 07.08.2007 18:05, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
0. Apply the patches.
1. cd to the top level of the distribution directory tree (above src)
2. Run: autoconf
3. Run: autoheader
4. Run: automake
5. Run: configure
6. Compile
Thanks, this seems to work at last !
But unfortunately, I get
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
..
sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)Err#11 EAGAIN
fstat64(10, 0x000CB208) = 0
sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF4A0,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
The new Sieve supports include feature, so it should be somewhat easy to
support automatic includes. I think.
Will this support be included in dovecot 1.1?
Sebastian
- --
Sebastian Ganschow
Königsberger Str. 17
45770 Marl
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
..
sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)Err#11 EAGAIN
fstat64(10,
also sprach Joseba Torre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.09.1251 +0200]:
As long as nothing depends on whatever you patch, you can do it
with no problem. And I don't think that anything depends on
dovecot.
You just won't get security updates anymore.
--
martin; (greetings from the
also sprach Steffen Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.09.0902 +0200]:
Sendmail uses different mailers (exim calls them transports, if
I remember correctly) for the two different maildrops, scripts
are invoked by the virtual *prog* mailer, whereas the spooling
into a local mailbox is performed
Le jeudi 09 août 2007 09:47, Sebastian Ganschow a écrit :
But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder. I'm not
really sure, if this is the solution i'd like to have.
Why not include a default sieve
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:47 +0200, Chris Laif wrote:
Hi.
I'm using SMTP auth with Exim authenticating against Dovecot's auth
socket. My (excellent) SMTP test tool swaks
(http://jetmore.org/john/code/#swaks) tries multiple auth mechanismus
consecutively which leads to the following message
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:50 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
ileneyoung,:::10.200.254.110): lookup
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:12 -0400, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
I'm trying to set up two shared folder hierarchies on my Dovecot
installation for two groups of employees, all of whom should only have
access to their own hierarchy. Any employee should be able to create
sub-folders and
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 22:47 +0100, pod wrote:
I'd like to put forward the following patch for dovecot-sieve.
Thanks, committed.
and Resent-BCC fields. Note that the appended patch also includes a
fix for some missing parentheses in the resent-to test which resulted
in some extra
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:23:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
The fix has been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried to send some of my own changes and minor fixes a few times
already but no-one's ever answered. Maybe I should try once more.
The cyrus-bugs is (or at least seems to be)
Le 09.08.2007 12:45, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
Aug 7 19:34:36 rouge dovecot: IMAP(stransky): quota-fs: remote rquota
call failed: RPC: Authentication error
Did you include http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/0f6d4f8dd587
You are right, this was not included, thanks ! Now I have included this
I tried to disable courier-pop3 today in favour of dovecot pop3.
Prior to that I ran:
find /home -maxdepth 1 -type d | xargs --replace
/usr/local/scripts/courier-dovecot-migrate.pl --overwrite --recursive --convert
{}
( /home is hashed two levels deep: /home/a/a/aanton/Maildir/ )
After that,
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 17:36 -0400, Jerry Yeager wrote:
dovecot: imap-login: Maximum number of connections exceeded:
user=username, method=PLAIN, rip=192.168.1.1, lip=192.168.1.50, TLS
mail_max_userip_connections limit causes this. I guess I'll have to
change the error message, because even I
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:19 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
I tried to disable courier-pop3 today in favour of dovecot pop3.
Prior to that I ran:
find /home -maxdepth 1 -type d | xargs --replace
/usr/local/scripts/courier-dovecot-migrate.pl --overwrite --recursive
--convert {}
( /home
* Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you had run Dovecot as IMAP server, then it wasn't such a great idea
to run the migration, because it recreates dovecot-uidlist files trying
to make them compatible with Courier's POP3 uidlist file.
Oops.
Creating dovecot-uidlist then caused the
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:35 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Creating dovecot-uidlist then caused the UIDVALIDITY to change, which
causes IMAP clients to redownload all messages, and as you can see
Dovecot doesn't handle UIDVALIDITY changes all that nicely. v1.1 does a
better job with it
* Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, what you just did probably did that. It just caused IMAP users to
download the mails again, but that's more transparent to users because
it doesn't create duplicates.
OK
I did think about adding the possibility of storing POP3 UIDLs to a
separate
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 08:43 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
Why, yes, it does. Do I need to swap them ore delete X-IMAPbase,
Swapping probably helps.
and is there a utility to do that, or do I have to make one?
I'm not aware of such an utility.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Hi there,
I got dovecot compiled and running on HP-UX 11.23.
It's using LDAPUX and PAM for authentication. So far, it works. But after
logging in the connection is closed immediately. It looks like this:
telnet ip 143
Connected to ...
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Dovecot ready.
a01 login user
Why, yes, it does. Do I need to swap them ore delete X-IMAPbase, and is
there a utility to do that, or do I have to make one?
Dan
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:53 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:32 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
I am moving from and old FC2 system to a new
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot?
Yes.
- Is there a way to tell an external application when mail has been
moved by a client?
Not really. There is a plugin for dspam, but there is no generic plugin.
-
I did that and it was not able to fix things.
Additionally in my logs I get the following messages:
Dovecot v1.0.rc15 starting up
pop3-login: Login: user=danield, method=PLAIN,
rip=:::128.174.124.57, lip=:::128.174.124.57, secured
POP3(danield): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:03 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
We are getting e-mails from a certain domain that seem to cause the IMAP
process to hang.
..
sendfilev64(1, 1, 0xFFBFF2C0, 1, 0xFFBFF2B4)
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 11:23 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
[Quick side-question: should I be using $USER or $RESTRICTED_USER
here? I can't work out what the difference between them is. Both
are set within Dovecot's standard environment.]
If you're using system users they're the same. If
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:00 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
I did that and it was not able to fix things.
Additionally in my logs I get the following messages:
Dovecot v1.0.rc15 starting up
pop3-login: Login: user=danield, method=PLAIN,
rip=:::128.174.124.57,
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovecot's fdpass.c...
Dovecot's fd_send() probably doesn't work right with HP-UX.
I blasted /home/username/mail/.imap recopied the mailbox, swapped the
UID and the IMAP lines and it worked.
thanks for the help,
Dan
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:19 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:00 -0500, Daniel Davidson wrote:
I did that and it was not able to fix
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovecot's
fdpass.c...
Dovecot's fd_send() probably doesn't work right with
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:04 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Luehr wrote:
Error: imap-login: fd_send(7) failed: Bad file number
Error: child 22629 (login) returned error 89
As far as I can see, the problem seems to reside in dovecot's
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:42 +0200, Thibault VINCENT wrote:
The very precise question is : How can I tell dovecot to compute the « home »
path from the login name when using LDAP userdb ?
This is possible with Dovecot v1.1, but not with v1.0. There you can
use:
user_attrs = ...,
Did a quick-n-dirty install of 1.1.alpha2 on a Fedora Core 6 server... am
getting the following message in the maillog, though there seems to be no
problem accessing mail. Error seems to be consistent for all users.
Running 1.0.3 on the system previously.
Aug 8 22:49:26 stage2 dovecot:
Hello, under what situation the error:
dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted (kept it 0 seconds )
will happen? I saw quite some of these in dovecot log.
Thanks,
- Joe
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.09.1319 +0200]:
So yes, if I find a suitable virtual delivery agent or a way to pass
the maildir location from postfix to e.g. procmail, I'll have it
solved. But right now it does not look like it's possible.
I can report success. This
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:44 -0600, Mike Cisar wrote:
Did a quick-n-dirty install of 1.1.alpha2 on a Fedora Core 6 server... am
getting the following message in the maillog, though there seems to be no
problem accessing mail. Error seems to be consistent for all users.
Running 1.0.3 on the
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 23:49 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
Hello, under what situation the error:
dovecot-uidlist.lock was deleted (kept it 0 seconds )
will happen? I saw quite some of these in dovecot log.
Do you use NFS? If so, are all clocks synchronized? What Dovecot
version?
signature.asc
Hi Timo,
Yes, it is on NFS. Version is 1.0.2. Does the time matter?
- Joe
- Original Message -
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joe Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] dotlock file
Yes, it is on NFS. Version is 1.0.2. Does the time matter?
You're serious??
Time is *always* important on a mail server - and even more so when NFS
is involved...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:40
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 00:39 +0800, Joe Wong wrote:
Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
Keep it less than a second or you'll have problems.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Joe Wong spake the following on 8/9/2007 9:39 AM:
Oh Yes.. I mean the time sync between the file server and the dovecot
server. :-) what if there is a few seconds differences between the two?
Fix it! Run ntp or an equivalent on all servers that use NFS or handle mail.
It is that important to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Is it OK to move mailboxes around from under Dovecot?
Yes.
Cool. I'm impressed by Dovecot, really :-)
- Is there a
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:29 +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
/* setup environment - set the most important environment first
(paranoia about filling up environment without noticing) */
restrict_access_set_env(system_user, uid, gid, chroot_dir,
On Aug 9, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:50 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:07 +0200, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
IMAP(doudou): file ostream-crlf.c: line 339 (_send_istream): assertion
failed: ((size_t)ret = iov.iov_len)
Hmm. Can you get Dovecot to dump a core file?
Probably easiest way to get this fixed would be then if you sent me
the
Hi,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:54 +0200, Bernd Kuhls wrote:
- The index for $HOME/.imap_mail/inbox is created in
$HOME/.imap_mail/.imap/inbox/, while the indexes for other mbox files
are created in /var/mail/indexes/%u, like its supposed to be. How to
disable
57 matches
Mail list logo
