I recently upgradeded dovecot on one of our servers from version 1.0.10
to version 1.1.3. Ever since, we've been seeing occasional errors
similar to this sequence (with the username and IP addresses elided):
Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3-login: Login: [4954], ,
NNN.NNN.NN.NNN
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I actually started it today since it's needed for replication:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/6dd0c6755afe
Mailboxes can't be listed yet (and I'm not planning on implementing that
anytime soon), but if you add the wanted mailboxes to
Hi.
I have a question about quota messages (dovecot 1.1.3).
I'm tryng to use quota messages for moving messages in a new folder when
they reach a certin number(1).
I made the script which is called when quota_warning condition is met.
Then i made a rule to exclude that folder from quota,
Hi.
I have a question about quota messages (dovecot 1.1.3).
I'm trying to use quota messages for moving messages in a new folder when
they reach a certain number(1).
I made the script which is called when quota_warning condition is met.
Then i made a rule to exclude that folder from quota,
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:46 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote:
namespace shared {
separator = /
# %%u gets expanded to the remote user. Instead of %%u you can
# also use %%n and %%d.
prefix = shared/%%u/
location = Maildir:/home/%%u/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u
}
Sounds
Hello,
I work for an organization that uses a Secure Dovecot server for messaging, and
recently we've had to undergo some security screenings for PKI compliance
(credit card industry standards). However, the screening returned to us a
failure due to the following reason (attributed to our
I *think* you can fix this in your config.
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:+HIGH:+MEDIUM
Consider yourself lucky you're not using UW. I believe you need to
recompile it.
Nessus thinks I'm good with the setting above.
John
Amit Thakkar wrote:
Hello,
I work for an organization
BTW. Dovecot v1.1 has by default:
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW:!SSLv2
I'd think that's enough to fix this too.
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:23 -0400, John Gray wrote:
I *think* you can fix this in your config.
ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!ADH:!LOW:!SSLv2:!EXP:+HIGH:+MEDIUM
Consider yourself lucky
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:46 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote:
namespace shared {
separator = /
# %%u gets expanded to the remote user. Instead of %%u you can
# also use %%n and %%d.
prefix = shared/%%u/
location =
Hello.
I install a sieve rule automatically when a mailbox is created, like:
if exists X-Spam-Flag {
fileinto Junk;
stop;
}
However, sometimes, this folder does not exist. How create it automatically?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
-Nicolas.
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
Is there a %%h, too? So that, if we have
mail_location = maildir:~
..
Another (more specific) problem in this context: Is is it possible
to
determine a users home calling an external program like
checkpassword?
This would be needed in an
Hi List,
Hi dovecot-list,
just a easy question today ;)
Customer did on Server a PCI-Test to test security to fit worldpay
requirements.
They found a critical risk at pop3s. (and some other things)
This is the Textmesage:
Family: Remote Shell Access Critical 993/tcp 11875
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
Is there a %%h, too? So that, if we have
mail_location = maildir:~
..
Another (more specific) problem in this context: Is is it possible
to
determine a users home calling an external program like
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
On Sep 30, 2008, at 6:08 PM, Sascha Wilde wrote:
Is there a %%h, too? So that, if we have
mail_location = maildir:~
..
Another (more specific) problem in this context: Is is it possible
to
determine a users home calling an external program
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I install a sieve rule automatically when a mailbox is created, like:
if exists X-Spam-Flag {
fileinto Junk;
stop;
}
However, sometimes, this folder does not exist. How create it automatically?
It is created automatically (at least on
Seth Mattinen escreveu:
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Hello.
I install a sieve rule automatically when a mailbox is created, like:
if exists X-Spam-Flag {
fileinto Junk;
stop;
}
However, sometimes, this folder does not exist. How create it automatically?
It is
FYI, Nessus scans are used for PCI Compliance. So if you've got all the
plugins, you're good to go for vulnerability checks.
IIRC, !SSLv2 was my solution when the SSL thing came up last year for
PCI Compliance (previous job).
Rick
Timo Sirainen wrote:
BTW. Dovecot v1.1 has by default:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 10:01 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 09:40 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Has anyone (is anyone) working on adding quota support to dovecot's
managesieve server? I was thinking about giving it a shot myself and I'd
hate to
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maybe I'm overthinking the problem. There probably won't be more than a
few scripts. It's probably simplest if the quota is always just
recalculated by lstat()ing the files.
Pretty much what I was thinking about doing. Calculate total size of the
sieve scripts and compare
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maybe I'm overthinking the problem. There probably won't be more than a
few scripts. It's probably simplest if the quota is always just
recalculated by lstat()ing the files.
Pretty much what I was thinking
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:04 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
Sep 22 11:54:13 egg mail:err|error dovecot: IMAP(sdean): posix_fallocate() faile
d: Protocol not available
See if this helps: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/ad13463328aa
My apologies for not
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 10:47 -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Maybe I'm overthinking the problem. There probably won't be more than a
few scripts. It's probably simplest if the quota is always just
recalculated by lstat()ing the files.
Well... the main use for Quotas is for rejecting NEW
messages at
delivery time - not for controlling a static set of
mailboxes.
Are you saying you didn't even test by sending yourself
a test message?
--
The way I was testing was by setting the quota warning threshold low like
Andre Hübner wrote:
Hi dovecot-list,
just a easy question today ;)
Customer did on Server a PCI-Test to test security to fit worldpay requirements.
NB: PCI is not to fit Worldpay's requirements; but rather the body of
PCI-DSS (Visa Mastercard).
1. What was the scanning tool? Qualys?
2.
24 matches
Mail list logo
