Am 13.10.2014 um 23:29 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
> Guys,
>
> Whats the best mailbox format:
> - dbox
> - mbox
> - maildir
> - ?!?
there is no universal answer to this
a minimum answer might be, maildir is ok in a small non cluster setup
ever, please study wiki and archive for more info
Best Regards
Hi all,
Ya, I've read the wiki and the best choice I believe it's MailDir format.
Simple and direct information on the wiki, thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Robert
> Schetterer
> Sent: terça-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2014 09:02
Hi list owner,
Sorry for this.
Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the
person who replied?
Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.
Just two things to get better.
Thanks,
Am 14.10.2014 um 10:28 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
Sorry for this.
Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the
person who replied?
just use "reply to list"
Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy
no - type "yahoo lists DMARC" in Google as well
as the s
On 2014-10-14 10:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the
> person who replied?
Every good MUA has a possibility for replying to the list. Also read
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> Also the [Dovecot] on the subject wou
Am 14.10.2014 um 10:28 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
> Hi list owner,
>
>
>
> Sorry for this.
>
> Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the
> person who replied?
>
> Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.
>
>
>
> Just two things to get better.
>
>
On 10/14/2014 1:28 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.
The list used to do this. I agree with you, and the matter was debated,
but the list is not a democracy and Timo, as the owner, changed the list
unilaterally.
The problem is that changing the subj
Am 14.10.2014 um 11:02 schrieb Professa Dementia:
On 10/14/2014 1:28 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.
The list used to do this. I agree with you, and the matter was debated,
but the list is not a democracy and Timo, as the owner, changed the list
uni
On 2014-10-14 11:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
> nonsense because that spamfilters use DKIM and SPF
> *too* for their scoring
Sorry, didn't know that spamasassin is the only available spam filter on
the market.
Am 14.10.2014 um 11:40 schrieb Moritz Augsburger:
On 2014-10-14 11:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
nonsense because that spamfilters use DKIM and SPF
*too* for their scoring
Sorry, didn't know that spamasassin is the only available
spam filter on the market
no, but most others work similar and SA
Professa Dementia wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 1:28 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
>
>> Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy.
>
> The list used to do this. I agree with you, and the matter was
> debated, but the list is not a democracy and Timo, as the owner,
> changed the list unilaterally.
>
Hi everybody,
I store user's mail in the old mbox format.
I have many scripts to manage users that works fine with mbox.
I use the very old Expire_mail.pl script to delete mail older than NN
days for selected users (nightly cron job). Still works fine with my
CentOS dovecot-2.0.16.
Now I
Hi,
In our setup, we use two quota roots. One for user quota and one for
domain quota. If a user has no quota, then the domain quota is applied.
For a user with user quota this is how it looks:
# doveadm quota get -u t...@shellz.nl
Quota name Type Value Limit %
Domain quota STORAGE 1439
On 14.10.2014 15:38, Rick van den Hof wrote:
Hi,
In our setup, we use two quota roots. One for user quota and one for
domain quota. If a user has no quota, then the domain quota is applied.
The recalc action has updated the domain usage to reflect the specific
user's usage (my 12876 messages ar
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:33:55 +0200
Moritz Augsburger wrote:
> On 2014-10-14 10:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list,
> > and not the person who replied?
>
> Every good MUA has a possibility for replying to the list. Also read
> http://www.un
Am 14.10.2014 um 16:35 schrieb Steve Litt:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:33:55 +0200
Moritz Augsburger wrote:
On 2014-10-14 10:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list,
and not the person who replied?
Every good MUA has a possibility for replying to
I upgraded dovecot from v1 to v2 as part of a CentOS upgrade (5.6->6.5) and am
now running on 2.0.9. Any time I connect to the pop or imap ports however I get
"master: Error: service(imap-login): child 2860 killed with signal 11 (core not
dumped - add -D parameter to service imap-login { executa
Am 14.10.2014 um 17:53 schrieb James Shewey:
> I upgraded dovecot from v1 to v2 as part of a CentOS upgrade (5.6->6.5) and
> am now running on 2.0.9. Any time I connect to the pop or imap ports however
> I get "master: Error: service(imap-login): child 2860 killed with signal 11
> (core not dump
On 14.10.2014 16:35, Steve Litt wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:33:55 +0200
Moritz Augsburger wrote:
On 2014-10-14 10:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list,
and not the person who replied?
Every good MUA has a possibility for replying to the li
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig
Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought.
I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments
and trying to adjust to th
dovecot-2.2.13 running on Solaris-10, app 5000 concurrent connections,
and a pretty standard config where passdb is set up with driver = pam.
We have had some situations where an auth-worker gets into a loop, the load on
the server rises and the auth-master seems blocked untill finally no new imap
On 14 Oct 2014, at 01:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the
> person who replied?
I've a patched mailman that allows you to set the reply-to headers to your
mails, indicating that you want replies only to list. See the "edit optio
Perfect :)
> -Original Message-
> From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Timo
> Sirainen
> Sent: terça-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2014 18:08
> To: Dovecot Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Request to list owner
>
> On 14 Oct 2014, at 01:28, Jorge Bastos wrote:
>
> > Is i
Am 14.10.2014 um 18:43 schrieb Przemysław Orzechowski:
> Of course Thunderbird has reply to list option
and if there is no sieve on the server you may define a filter in
Thunderbird, guees its the same with outlook
see pics in
https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/04/12/thunderbird-filter-list-id/
Best
Seems like Timo had a fix for this already!
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/4dc3f6103c48
It will do the trick right - we love dovecot!
hmk
Am 14.10.2014 um 19:44 schrieb Hans Morten Kind:
Seems like Timo had a fix for this already!
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/4dc3f6103c48
It will do the trick right - we love dovecot!
go back shortly before your first message
there was a announcement for a new stable release!
si
Hey all, sorry if this has been asked before, but I haven’t really found a good
solution. I have a mac at home and randomly, maybe once a week or once a
month, Mail.app will go crazy and use as much bandwidth as I have to pull down
mail. I’m not home so I can’t tell what it’s done or why, and
Am 14.10.2014 um 20:25 schrieb Alan Bailward:
> Hey all, sorry if this has been asked before, but I haven’t really found a
> good solution. I have a mac at home and randomly, maybe once a week or once
> a month, Mail.app will go crazy and use as much bandwidth as I have to pull
> down mail. I’
Timo
can you help me with this error?
dovecot-2.2.14$ make
make all-recursive
Making all in .
/bin/bash ./update-version.sh . .
Making all in src
Making all in lib-test
Making all in lib
make all-am
Making all in lib-settings
Making all in lib-auth
Making all in lib-master
Making all in lib-cha
On 14 Oct 2014, at 11:53, The Doctor wrote:
> In file included from mailbox-list-index-iter.c:8:
> mailbox-list-index.h:89: field `last_refresh_timeval' has incomplete type
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/93a3335ec0d5 should help.
Since people are now talking about the SSLv3 security hole and how to disable
it, here's a thread where you can talk about that. In Dovecot v2.1+ you can
disable SSLv3 by setting:
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
In older versions you'd have to patch the source code. Attached a patch against
v2.0
We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
backend servers running dovecot-2.2.13-r1
When we're using Thundebird to connect to the dovecot proxy, we're
getting the message "The mail server for account ACCOUNTNAME
responded: [COMPRESSIONACTIVE] TLS compression already enable
On 14 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
> backend servers running dovecot-2.2.13-r1
>
> When we're using Thundebird to connect to the dovecot proxy, we're
> getting the message "The mail server for account ACCOUNTNAME
* Timo Sirainen schrieb am 15.10.14 um 00:57 Uhr:
On 14 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
backend servers running dovecot-2.2.13-r1
When we're using Thundebird to connect to the dovecot proxy, we're
getting the messa
On 14 Oct 2014, at 12:25, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Since people are now talking about the SSLv3 security hole and how to disable
> it, here's a thread where you can talk about that. In Dovecot v2.1+ you can
> disable SSLv3 by setting:
>
> ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
>
> In older versions you'
On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:10, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Timo Sirainen schrieb am 15.10.14 um 00:57 Uhr:
>> On 14 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>
>>> We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
>>> backend servers running dovecot-2.2.13-r1
>>>
>>> When we're
On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:39, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:10, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
>> * Timo Sirainen schrieb am 15.10.14 um 00:57 Uhr:
>>> On 14 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>>>
We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
back
"F." writes:
doveadm-altmove seems interesting, but in the man page it is reported
only work with dbox (dbox-only), and my inboxes are in mbox format.
Any other advice?
As I originally wrote, my need is script or a command like the old
Expire_mail.pl that parse a local mbox folder and move/
* Timo Sirainen schrieb am 15.10.14 um 01:39 Uhr:
On 14 Oct 2014, at 16:10, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
* Timo Sirainen schrieb am 15.10.14 um 00:57 Uhr:
On 14 Oct 2014, at 15:24, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
We're proxying using 2.2.14~rc1 (on our IMAP Proxy) to two dovecot
backend servers running
On 27 Sep 2014, at 17:48, Tim wrote:
> unfortunately I'm getting the following two kinds of error messages for
> all mail boxes in my mail.log:
>
> Error: Corrupted index cache file
> /home/vmail/%domain/%user/mdbox/mailboxes/%maildir/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache:
> Broken virtual size for mai
On 10 Oct 2014, at 00:53, Andre Rodier wrote:
> On 09/10/14 23:06, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 09 Oct 2014, at 15:20, C Peters wrote:
>>
>>> The Dovecot wiki [1] doesn't list either Exim, Postfix or anything
>>> else as supporting the dbox. I did some searching in the Exim
>>> archives and have
41 matches
Mail list logo
