> On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:58, Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> Here is the Pigeonhole release candidate that goes with the Dovecot
> v2.3 release candidate. Of course, a large part of this release consists
> of compatibility changes for Dovecot v2.3. Apart from that, not much
> changed, just a few additi
On 19 Dec 2017, at 03:24, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> As soon as possible after release. I'm the maintainer for pigeonhole, and
> Adam Weinberger is the maintainer for dovecot (I'm AKA l...@freebsd.org).
Oh good. Time to start diving in to pigeonhole :)
--
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in
> On 19 Dec 2017, at 10:13, Matthew Broadhead
> wrote:
>
> does anyone know of a linux module (maybe similar to fail2ban) that could be
> installed which would monitor email logs (sign ins) and alert the user to any
> suspicious activity on their account?
Fail2ban can protect email logins.
I'm planning on adding support for sieve to Roundcube here in the near future
and am looking for any recommendations on read-mes on how to do this.
I am planning on waiting until 2.3.0 hits Freebsd Ports
--
No Sigs. Blame Apple.
On 29 Dec 2017, at 07:28, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Op 29-12-2017 om 15:21 schreef @lbutlr:
>> I'm planning on adding support for sieve to Roundcube here in the near
>> future and am looking for any recommendations on read-mes on how to do this.
>>
>> I am plan
I have dovecot 2.2.33 installed. When trying to install dovecot2-pigeonhole (v
0.4.19) I get the following when it tries to install dovecot 2.2.31_1
I run portsnap fetch update daily, and I ran it again after this error, but
same result.
===> Installing for dovecot2-2.2.31_1
===> Checking if
> On 23 Jan 2018, at 18:49, Vlad K. wrote:
>
> On 2018-01-24 02:22, @lbutlr wrote:
>> I have dovecot 2.2.33 installed. When trying to install
>> dovecot2-pigeonhole (v 0.4.19) I get the following when it tries to
>> install dovecot 2.2.31_1
>
>
> dov
# 2.2.33.2 (d6601f4ec):
If I do
doveadm index -u user "*"
for a local user, it works fine, but if I do
doveadm -u "*@sqldomain.tld" "*"
or
doveadm -u "*@localaliasdomain.tld" "*"
or
doveadm -u "*@localdomain.tld" "*"
or
doveadm -u "u...@localdomain.tld" "*"
it fails,
… -u "u..
Cribbing from the dovecot site I recently added the following lines to my
dovecot.conf:
managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character
vacation subaddress comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags copy
include variab
On 2018-02-12 (19:24 MST), @lbutlr wrote:
>
> Cribbing from the dovecot site I recently added the following lines to my
> dovecot.conf:
>
> managesieve_notify_capability = mailto
> managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope encoded-character
> vacation su
On 2018-02-12 (19:45 MST), Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> Make sure you sievec the sieve global scripts.
Id did miss that in the instructions for some reason, but it reports the same
error.
# sievec /usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
report-spam: line 7: error: pipe command: invalid program
On 2018-02-12 (20:11 MST), @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 2018-02-12 (19:45 MST), Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>> Make sure you sievec the sieve global scripts.
>
> Id did miss that in the instructions for some reason, but it reports the same
> error.
>
> # sie
On 13 Feb 2018, at 00:11, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> doveadm -u "*mask*" makes no sense.
The “index” that was in the first line was dropped out of my further examples.
But now where was there a “*mask*”.
> what command are you trying to run?
# doveadm index -u “*@sqldomain.tld" "*”
Error: User listin
On 2018-02-13 (13:44 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Check dovecot logs why user listing returned an error. Auth process is
> producing the error.
Thanks,
auth-worker(40200): Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table 'postfix.users'
doesn't exist
Which is accurate, the database does not contain a t
Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that
automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and
possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this
for sieve.
Basically, what I do now in procmail is
1. Get the lis
On 2018-02-16 (00:18 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 16.02.2018 04:36, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>> But I am looking for something more generic, along the lines of
>>
>> $myLists = {"dovecot", "postfix", "other-list")
>> if header :con
On 2018-02-19 (14:08 MST), jorda...@startmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm using SSL for dovecot, and dovecot kindly warned me on startup that I
> needed the ssl_dh parameter, which I specified:
doveconf -n
--
They say whisky'll kill you, but I don't think it will I'm ridin' with
you to the top of the
On 2018-02-22 (07:48 MST), himbe...@shinymail.de wrote:
>
> Hello list.
>
> What is the preferred way to move an imap folder. Lets say an User has.
>
> .maildir/.INBOX.Junk
>
> I want to move this imap folder to:
>
> .maildir/.Junk
>
> Can i just use:
>
> mv .maildir/.INBOX.Junk .maildir/.Ju
When a sql user logs in, dovecot always tries pam first (used for the local
users with home directories) which generates a login failure in the log, before
trying sql (virtual users) and allowing the user to login.
Since all the pam users login as 'user' and all the sql users login as
'u...@exa
On 2018-02-22 (10:06 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> You can use username_filter setting on passdb block since 2.2.30
Excellent! thanks.
username_filter = "!*@*"
looks like the right syntax to put in the driver=pam block.
…yes, that appears to do the job.
--
Would you say you worship Satan, or
In a quest to remove “duplicate” messages sent to both me and lists I subscribe
to I came up with this, which I think should clean out my Archive folder, but
I’ve been unable to get it to work for scanning all on my list-user email.
$ doveadm -f table fetch -u kremels 'hdr.message-id guid uid hd
OK, perhaps I tried to cover too much, so let's just look at this:
If I run this command, I get no errors:
doveadm expunge -u kremels MAILBOX-GUID 1488800748.47633_1.mail.covisp.net UID
22908
But, if I search again
doveadm -f table fetch -u kremels 'hdr.message-id guid uid hdr.x-listname'
ma
On 2018-02-23 (16:47 MST), Joseph Tam wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> $ doveadm -f table fetch -u kremels 'hdr.message-id guid uid
>> hdr.x-listname' mailbox "Archive" | sort| awk 'cnt[$1]++{if
>> (cnt[$1]==2) print prev[$1
On 2018-02-23 (18:01 MST), @lbutlr wrote:
>
>>> First, even after expunging a message and running doveadm index -u
>>> kremels ?Archive?, subsequent runs still show the same duplicate
>>> messages.
>>
>> I suspect client side caching.
>
> No,
On 2018-02-24 (07:04 MST), Neil Jerram wrote:
>
> My INBOX file has 22990 messages. Is the slowness that I am seeing
> definitely expected for an mbox of that size? (It may also be relevant
> that the HDD it's stored on is pretty old now, and has been known to
> report SMART errors...)
back i
On 2018-02-24 (07:14 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
That didn't show up when searching wiki2 for "Migration" :/
--
"...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide acros
On Feb 26, 2018, at 08:28, SAAHIL IFTEKHAR wrote:
> My dovecot version is 2.2.10.
> My postfix version is 2.1.10.
What happens if you use current-ish versions.
--
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
I’ve created virtual mailboxes in dovecot, and they show up in various clients,
but the folders contain no messages. (I will get an ‘empty” folder icon named
“@virtual” and an empty folder icon named “month” inside it. Is there a way I
can verify what dovecot THINKS should be in the virtual fold
--
You only had to look into Teatime's mismatched eyes to know one thing,
which was this: if Teatime wanted to find you he would not look
everywhere. He'd look in only one place, which would be the place where
you were hiding. --Hogfather
> On 06 Mar 2018, at 13:13, Rob Hoelz wrote:
>
> I'v
On 2018-03-06 (14:41 MST), "@lbutlr" wrote:
>
>> and using "doveadm search mailbox $VIRTUAL_MAILBOX”
>
> # doveadm search mailbox "@virtual.day" -u kremels
> #
Any clues on this? As far as I can tell from the documentation and the list
this shoul
--
I AM NOT A LICENSED HAIRSTYLIST Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF04
On 2018-03-08 (00:05 MST), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2018 03:09, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 2018-03-06 (14:41 MST), "@lbutlr" wrote:
>>>> and using "doveadm search mailbox $VIRTUAL_MAILBOX”
>
On 2018-02-25 (09:31 MST), David Favor wrote:
>
> }
> local_name imap.cydec.com {
> ssl_cert = ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it
> }
Doesn't this still require a default t(top level) cert besides the one
specified for local_name?
Also, is there any reason to use local_name if your loca
On 2018-03-10 (16:48 MST), David Mehler wrote:
>
> Thanks. That query doesn't return any parse errors but it does say
> that it can't save the password.
Are you referencing the right table in your database?
--
It is the business of the future to be dangerous.
On 2018-03-06 (11:40 MST), @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I’ve created virtual mailboxes in dovecot, and they show up in various
> clients, but the folders contain no messages. (I will get an ‘empty” folder
> icon named “@virtual” and an empty folder icon named “month” inside it. Is
> th
On 2018-03-16 (05:29 MDT), Andre Rodier wrote:
>
> With 'name="var/cache/nscd/hosts"', is there any missing '/' at the beginning
> of the path, somewhere?
unless there is a relative path, I would guess so.
What's in your dovconf -n?
(But I am guessing this is an AppArmor issue and that you ha
I am getting the following in my /var/log/dovecot:
Error: sieve: Execution of script /usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
failed
Error: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate
Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor.pm in @INC (you may need to install the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin
/var/log/dovecot exists and has a lot of logging in it, but I get errors (in
mail.log) on an always_bcc action in postfix:
mail postfix/pipe[13015]: 401cvS0R8BzbSkL:
to=, relay=dovecot, delay=398058,
delays=398045/13/0/0.04, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command
output: Can't
On 2018-03-19 (13:02 MDT), @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I am getting the following in my /var/log/dovecot:
>
> Error: sieve: Execution of script /usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
> failed
>
> Error: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate
> Mail/Sp
On 2018-03-19 (13:19 MDT), Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> What does your doveconf -n have?
imap_id_log = *
log_path = /var/log/dovecot
--
I have a love child who sends me hate mail
On 2018-03-19 (13:19 MDT), Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> Plus, if dovecot is able to write to a file owned by root:wheel, then there
> is a BIG problem right there!!!
Logging is generally done by syslogd, not directly by the process. So no,
dovecot is not writing to a file owned by root anymo
On 2018-03-19 (14:20 MDT), Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> I have been running FreeBSD since 1997, so I know quite a lot about it!
> I know about /etc/syslog.conf, but you do realize now that you are
> conflicting yourself?
No, I am not, I pointed out that dovecot does not writ ether logs, but t
On 2018-03-19 (17:06 MDT), Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> Op 3/19/2018 om 8:40 PM schreef @lbutlr:
>> On 2018-03-19 (13:02 MDT), @lbutlr wrote:
>> After disabling razor, I am now getting:
>>
>> Error: sieve: Execution of script /usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.siev
On 2018-03-19 (17:06 MDT), Stephan Bosch wrote:
>
> Can you enable mail_debug =yes?
Well, that's fun. Re-enabled everything and it is working fine.
The best I can tell, someone dropped several hundred (or more?) messages into
their Junk mailbox and that went poorly. Is there a way to possibly
On 2018-03-21 (14:15 MDT), mj wrote:
>
> Even when the connection is denied because of a wrong password, the message
> "Allowing any password" is showing up in the logs.
The question is does it allow remote users to login with no password?
If not, then the message ie nearly notification that
On 2018-03-21 (17:15 MDT), Dmitry Filonov
wrote:
> Now the question is if there's any way to tell dovecot to rebuild
> dovecot-uidlist files using actual Maildir data. I don't want to remove
> dovecot-uidlist files as this triggers the whole mailbox being re-downloaded
> by the imap client. Wi
On 2018-03-22 (02:30 MDT), mj wrote:
>
> Yes, however, for SOGo with Native Outlook compatibility or SAML logon, the
> config is required.
>
> (https://sogo.nu/files/docs/v2/SOGoNativeOutlookConfigurationGuide.html)
I don't know what that is, but that is a terrible requirement that makes me
v
On 2018-03-22 (02:48 MDT), "@lbutlr" wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-22 (02:30 MDT), mj wrote:
>>
>> Yes, however, for SOGo with Native Outlook compatibility or SAML logon, the
>> config is required.
>>
>> (https://sogo.nu/files/docs/v2/SOGoNativeOutlookC
I would like to delete old mail from root's sent mailbox but doveadm throws
errors when I try to do this, not wanting to process root's mail at all (I am
running the commands as root, naturally)
# doveadm expunge -u root mailbox Sent SENTBEFORE 1-Apr-2018
doveadm(root): Error: Invalid settings i
On 2018-05-05 (06:52 MDT), Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>> And yet it is.
>
> in muttrc you miss ~ or $(HOME)/something
No.
>> Root has been aliased for decades. This has no impact on where and how
>> mutt stores the mail it sends as root out of root’s crontab.
>
> root user can read mail files fo
On 2018-05-05 (11:19 MDT), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> You could use tool like sudo or su to run mutt as non-root, instead of
> running it as root?
Maybe. Not sure if piping output in front to su will work, but I can certainly
try it.
--
"Making music should not be left to the professionals." - M
On 2018-05-05 (11:19 MDT), Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> What happens if you put the following in /root/.muttrc:
> Set record='/file/to/put/mail/in'
I get a mail still owned by root.
--
May you live in interesting times
On 2018-05-05 (11:19 MDT), Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> You could use tool like sudo or su to run mutt as non-root, instead of
> running it as root?
Thanks, that did work. Took a little, but no more sent mail in ~root.
--
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
How would I setup dovecot so that when messages are moved to the Archive
mailbox, they are marked as read?
Would it be similar to the imap-sieve for spam tagging?
imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Junk
imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY
imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-
On 2018-05-12 (01:51 MDT), Tobi wrote:
>
> Does it not help to add
>
> addflag "\\Seen";
>
> to your sieve script code?
I don't know. I do not currently have any sieve script code for dealing with
Archives, that's sort of what I was asking.
--
Lady Astor: "If you were my husband I'd give yo
On 2018-05-16 (08:54 MDT), Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>
> My problem is that when connecting, dovecot includes 2 copies of Let's
> Encrypt Authority X3 in the certificate chain.
I think Dovecot 2.2 also has this issue, if I remember previous posts
accurately. Recommendations to include the full
How would I get the rule
if header :contains "X-spam-flag" "YES" {
fileinto "Junk";
}
To apply to all users mail at delivery time?
On 2018-05-23 (08:17 MDT), André Rodier wrote:
> Use the default scripts, works well for me.
>
> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Configuration#Visible_Default_Script
>
> The Dovecot wiki is really helpful, have a look on it ;-)
Excellent, that's exactly what I want.
Question from th
I created a sieve_default to move any spam-tagged messages into the Junk
mailbox automatically, but it doesn’t appear to be working (though the other
imapsieve_mailbox… scripts are working).
From doveconf -n
plugin {
imapsieve_mailbox1_before = file:/usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/report-spam.sieve
> On 12 Jun 2018, at 01:23, Alex JOST wrote:
>
> Am 12.06.2018 um 01:01 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> I created a sieve_default to move any spam-tagged messages into the Junk
>> mailbox automatically, but it doesn’t appear to be working (though the other
>> imapsieve_m
On 13 Jun 2018, at 12:51, Sami Ketola wrote:
> Are you sure your sieve even gets executed? Anything in the logs? can you
> enable mail_debug=yes and try again?
> Can you post your doveconf -n?
I am not sure. I’ve made a couple of changes (put the default script and
compiled script into their ow
On 13 Jun 2018, at 16:14, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 13 Jun 2018, at 12:51, Sami Ketola wrote:
>> Are you sure your sieve even gets executed? Anything in the logs? can you
>> enable mail_debug=yes and try again?
>> Can you post your doveconf -n?
>
> I am not sure. I’ve ma
On Jun 15, 2018, at 14:52, Reio Remma wrote:
>
> Did you try running /usr/lib/dovecot/sieve/sa-learn-spam.sh outside of the
> sieve script?
Yes. And that works not also works if I take out the global defaults
declaration I added. What does not work at all is the drfefault.sieve action.
AFAICT
On 29 Jun 2018, at 01:42, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
> Now the question: if I have 5-6 people accessing the account via IMAP, has
> Dovecot (2.2.13 from Debian repositories) problems?
I routinely access my accounts from 5 devices, which dovecot doesn't know are
all "me".
This is rather the point
On 30 Jun 2018, at 03:28, Lukas wrote:
> body :text :contains "crypto",
> body :text :contains "sex",
> body :text :contains "viagra"
This is a very silly way to try to deal with spam. In fact, your own message to
the list will be flagged by your rule. Actual spam message
> On 30 Jun 2018, at 15:41, Lukas wrote:
>
> Sorry @lbutlr, this is a very silly answer to my question...!
> My script is not the definite spam solution on my mail server, obviously.
It doesn't matter. Triggering on specific words is not a spam solution.
> So, if you ca
On 22 Oct 2018, at 05:16, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> 127\.0\.0\.
That regex alone is probably sufficient.
--
In the velvet darkness of the blackest night Burning bright
There's a guiding star
Is it possible to override the POP3 delete on download command and make sure
that messages stay on the server for at least X hours or X days?
It is important that the messages be around long enough to hit a snapshot cycle
(using rsnapshot to backup ever hour).
--
Greedo didn't shoot first, mot
On 14 Dec 2018, at 16:30, @lbutlr wrote:
> Is it possible to override the POP3 delete on download command and make sure
> that messages stay on the server for at least X hours or X days?
>
> It is important that the messages be around long enough to hit a snapshot
> cycle (usi
> On 15 Dec 2018, at 03:11, Jochen Bern wrote:
>
> On 12/15/2018 12:34 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 14 Dec 2018, at 16:30, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> Is it possible to override the POP3 delete on download command and make
>>> sure that messages stay on the server for a
On 14 Dec 2018, at 17:09, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> On 12/14/18 3:34 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> Now that I think about it, even better would be a way to move the messages
>> into an archive box when they are downloaded, this way they will be entirely
>> invisible from th
On 14 Dec 2018, at 17:09, Robert L Mathews wrote:
> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge
I have a question about the namespace section.
> You create only a single namespace. When a message is expunged from mailbox
> , it's moved to a mailbox in the expunge namespace. When an
> entire
On 18 Jul 2020, at 11:23, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> On 12/07/2020 22:47, @lbutlr wrote:
>> On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43:
>>>> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is
>>>>
On 19 Jul 2020, at 07:31, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> :comparator might work better.
Seems likely, yes.
Sigh.
--
he'd moved like music, like someone dancing to a rhythm inside his
head. And his face for a moment in the moonlight was the skull of
an angel…
On 14 Aug 2020, at 15:29, Bruno Kiste wrote:
> Can I make it ignore the hostname part or accept the user "bruno" as
> "bruno@2c2axxx.online-server.cloud"?
> Can I change the lookup in dovecot or do I have to edit the postfix
> configuration?
It seems to me that the proper way to do this is to hav
On 17 Aug 2020, at 05:10, Gerald Galster wrote:
> I don't know how detailed this is in older Apple Mail versions
I don't think the detail has changed in many many years, if at all. I remember
using the logs to troubleshoot security issues 15 years ago.
Mac OS 10.11 El Capitan was released in 20
On 21 Aug 2020, at 01:05, Richard Hector wrote:
> Is that a standard interface? ie can a client like postfix talk to
> either dovecot or cyrus without knowing the difference?
Yes. Postfix does not care, though I find it is easier to setup and more
reliable to use dovecot (I've used both, YMMV).
On 27 Aug 2020, at 15:02, Marc Roos wrote:
> Is it possible to only replicate indexes and not the mail data? (Because
> the data is already on distributed storage)
Does replication re-copy data that is already on the replication server? I
don't think it does.
--
"Are you pondering what I'm
On 31 Aug 2020, at 06:23, Michael Gratton wrote:
> Any word about this issue? Should I file a bug in an actual bug tracker or
> something?
I don't think it's a bug?
--
Eliot: We'll figure it out. We always do.
Margo: When it's a test to cheat on. Not when we're stuck in some epic fantasy
On 31 Aug 2020, at 22:28, John S wrote:
> Recently I upgraded dovecot quite a few major versions. Since then some
> mailboxes are experiencing deleted mail reappearing. It seems to be happening
> roughly once a day, but not for every mail client or mailbox, I have at least
> two clients with th
On 31 Aug 2020, at 03:33, Thoralf Rickert-Wendt wrote:
> documentation https://wiki1.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapProxy (which is really old
> and should be updated)
That is documentation for Dovecott version 1 (that's the 1 in wiki1).
Other than that, I can't help you, but this documentation is abosl
I have the following in my default.sieve file:
require "fileinto";
if header :contains "X-spam-flag" "YES" {
require ["vnd.dovecot.pipe", "copy", "imapsieve", "environment", "variables",
"imap4flags"];
setflag "\\Seen";
fileinto "Junk";
}
This is largely unchanged, except that I added im
Any ideas on this?
> On 05 Sep 2020, at 11:47, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I have the following in my default.sieve file:
>
> require "fileinto";
> if header :contains "X-spam-flag" "YES" {
> require ["vnd.dovecot.pipe", "copy",
On 23 Sep 2020, at 08:52, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 23 Sep 2020, at 14:29, Marc Roos wrote:
>> You can do whatever you like, as long as the result is this 'text' file.
>> I have also bash file that modifies this file for users. You can make a
>> 5 min cron job that detects changes in ldap and
On 21 Sep 2020, at 01:48, Claudio Corvino wrote:
> problem still occurring, I just noticed that if I do an "ls -l
> /mnt/mail-storage//Maildir/cur/" from the Dovecot server I can unblock
> the mailbox of the user and Thunderbird can receives all the e-mails.
>
> The problem occurs even with the
On 25 Sep 2020, at 16:27, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 25.09.20 23:04, Alex wrote:
>>
I'd like to create a shared folder to be used with an Outlook client
and a Thunderbird client. We're currently using mboxes.
I've read the documentation here about creating a shared folder:
Is it possible to take the contents of a mailbox and feed them to the account's
.active_sieve file for reprocessing?
(For example, when editing the sieve file for my list account I introduced a
typo, so a hundred or some list messages ended up in the inbox instead of filed
properly into the mai
On 26 Sep 2020, at 07:45, Alec Moskvin wrote:
>250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
>250 AUTH=PLAIN LOGIN
I believe this is not really an issue. The warning is just that, a warning.
Some (broken) mail clients, Immagonnaguess Microsoft ones, expected the =, so
many mail servers provide it.
AFAIK, It is
On 29 Sep 2020, at 01:21, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> On 29/09/2020 09:09 @lbutlr wrote:
>> Is it possible to take the contents of a mailbox and feed them to the
>> account's .active_sieve file for reprocessing?
> You can use imap sieve refilter.
> https://doc.dovecot.o
On 29 Sep 2020, at 02:58, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2020, at 01:21, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2020 09:09 @lbutlr wrote:
>>> Is it possible to take the contents of a mailbox and feed them to the
>>> account's .active_sieve file for reprocessing?
&g
I thought this was working as intended, but I have recently been getting some
random messages put into this mailbox that definitely have list-ip headers
(including some messages from this list) and that do not have multiple
addresses. I believe this started happening on 20200922, which would hav
On 09 Oct 2020, at 02:15, Olivier Cailloux wrote:
> My question is really: are there providers out there that satisfy these
> two conditions:
> a) offer free e-mail accounts (similar to Yahoo, GMail, and so on)
Doubtful, and if so I don't know any.
> b) implement correctly the IMAP SEARCH featur
On 09 Oct 2020, at 02:16, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> It turns out that dovecot had been running uninterrupted since august
> 13th, the certificate was renewed on september 7th and I suspect it
> expired on october 7th.
The ACME protocol that LE uses has a specific feature for specifying a script
to r
> On 10 Oct 2020, at 08:35, Olivier Cailloux
> wrote:
>
> Le samedi 10 octobre 2020 à 03:31 -0600, @lbutlr a écrit :
>> On 09 Oct 2020, at 02:15, Olivier Cailloux <
>> olivier.caill...@dauphine.fr
>>> wrote:
>>> My question is really: are the
On 12 Oct 2020, at 02:51, webad...@exalt.com.au wrote:
> I created a client library to send emails for a webapp.
>
> When the client library makes a connection to the SMTP server, and then do
> NOT add Message-Id header, Message-ID (with a capital D) header is added,
> and the SMTP server adds
> On 12 Oct 2020, at 03:06, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> On 12-10-2020 10:16, Robert Martin wrote:
>> I created a client library to send emails for a webapp.
>>
>>
>> After connecting to the SMTP server with credential setup in CPANEL, and
>> then do NOT add Message-Id header, the DKIM signatur
When using autoexpunge = 14 days in, for example. The trash of junk folders,
does that physically remove the messages from disk or simply mark them to be
removed and some other action needs to be taken?
I ask because my mail server crapped out today and I discovered a Junk folder
with 490,000 m
On 13 Oct 2020, at 21:54, webad...@exalt.com.au wrote:
> I am investigating whether dovecot(https://github.com/dovecot/core/) handles
> case insensitive Message-ID headers as per RFC.
What do you mean by "handles"? Dovecot is an LDA, it has no interaction with
the Message-ID headers.
You've been
On 13 Oct 2020, at 20:36, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> I am using Dovecot 2.3.4.1 with maildirs. Just found out that MacOS Mail
> clients cannot work with nested folders, presumably because the MacOS
> Mail does not understand "." as the IMAP separator.
This is not correct. Mac Mail has no problems wi
On 14 Oct 2020, at 04:24, Sami Ketola wrote:
> On 14. Oct 2020, at 12.51, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> Those Mac clients who do not use nested folders do not seem to be
>> affected. That is, I've already suggested to the Mac Mail user that he
>> start Thunderbird, move all his mailboxes into the IMAP
On 14 Oct 2020, at 05:39, Sami Ketola wrote:
>> On 14. Oct 2020, at 14.20, @lbutlr wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Oct 2020, at 04:24, Sami Ketola wrote:
>>> On 14. Oct 2020, at 12.51, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>>>> Those Mac clients who do not use nested folders do not
1 - 100 of 547 matches
Mail list logo
