[Dovecot] Single quote email addresses

for any help anyone can give. Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Dovecot timeout over NFS

/dev2_aluminati.net/Maildir/.Deleted Items/dovecot.index.log Is there anything I can do to compensate for situations like this? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot timeout over NFS

On 24/04/2008, Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you set maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=yes? Yes, that's already set. I've also added: default_mail_env = maildir:%h/Maildir/:INDEX=MEMORY after reading the suggestion somewhere. The server is only running one domain so far so it's not

[Dovecot] Corrupted transaction logs

access to both mail stores and I'm assuming that that is what's causing the problem. I'm running dovecot 1.0.10 (Ubuntu - so I'm using only packages provides by aptitude at the moment). Should dovecot be able to handle access by multiple machines for the indexes? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do

[Dovecot] Install from source of dovecot 1.1.2

/etc and when I try and start dovecot it looks for the libexec dir in /usr/local instead of /usr. Is there something I'm missing on the configure? I've very, very little experience (rather obviously) installing directly from source so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Guy -- Don't

Re: [Dovecot] Install from source of dovecot 1.1.2

Thanks for everyone's input. I was already sudoed to root before running any of the operations so it wasn't that. May have been that --with-storages error I'd made. I tried your config John, with mods for my system and besides having to add the dovecot user/group manually it seems to be running

[Dovecot] allow_nets overridden by cache

. Is there a gotcha that I'm unaware of or have I done something stupid (which seems the most likely :P)? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

Re: [Dovecot] allow_nets overridden by cache

to 15 seconds it would still fail the allow_nets check and then get a cache hit and be logged in. If there's any other information I can provide please let me know. Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0 progress?

Dovecot/Maildrop/Maildir to Dovecot/deliver/mdbox if 2.0 is likely to be reasonably safe to use in the next month or so. Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Dovecot director - silly questions

to a random mail server (they both have access to the NFS shares), won't I run into the same index problem? Should I look at per user transports before then or can director also be used to effect Dovecot deliver? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

Re: [Dovecot] Can't receive emails

/syslog or /var/log/mail.log or similar. The postfix mailing list is probably what you're looking for: http://www.postfix.org/lists.html And you should give this a quick read before posting: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Error message in logs since 1.1.6 upgrade

:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed or bad record mac If this isn't already a known error, is there any extra data I can collect that would help diagnose what's causing it? I haven't a clue where to start with this sort of debugging I'm afraid. Thanks Guy -- Don't just do

[Dovecot] Intermittent certificate cannot be verified error

intermittent I'm not sure where to start. Since there are no real errors in the Dovecot logs I'm suspecting that haproxy is perhaps not routing every packet correctly leading to Dovecot not getting all the data needed for the connection. Are there any other possibilities I've missed? Thanks Guy r

[Dovecot] Seperate auth per protocol (pop3/imap)

for the userdb and passdb lookups at the moment. Is it possible to specify separate auth files with different MySQL lookups per protocol? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Dovecot + DRBD/GFS mailstore

NFS. I'm looking for better performance but still keeping the HA element I have now with shared storage over NFS. Has anyone had experience with a setup like the one I'm suggesting? What was performance like with Dovecot using GFS? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] 1.1.8 upgrade to 1.2

included dovecot -n below. Thanks Guy #dovecot -n # 1.1.8: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.24-23-server x86_64 Ubuntu 8.04.2 protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s listen(default): *:143 listen(imap): *:143 listen(pop3): *:110 ssl_listen(default): *:993 ssl_listen(imap): *:993 ssl_listen(pop3

[Dovecot] Funky quota things

. If the account is still using over 100% of quota after the 7 days then the 100% quota is enforced so no new mail will be accepted. So is something like this burst quota possible in the Dovecot plugin? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2.2

, which is running just fine, but is there anything I can do to help trace what was causing the problem? Unfortunately I don't have a clue where to start. Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] Internal server

peoples' experience with 2.0 is like so far? Is it reasonably stable already? Is there also a page showing the differences in config for dbox over maildir? Or is it simply just the change in mail_location and nothing else? Thanks Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

Re: [Dovecot] NFS random redirects

wouldn't use NFS with multiple servers accessing it again for Dovecot. Looking at a clustered FS on SAN solution at the moment. Cheers Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot not delivering mail.

installing Dovecot from source under Ubuntu as they're lagging well behind. Karmic still only has Dovecot 1.1.11. Cheers Guy -- Don't just do something...sit there!

[Dovecot] SiS

Hello, SiS is implemented and stable in the last version ? Best Regards Guy

Re: [Dovecot] mail_max_userip_connections=10

Timo Sirainen tss at iki.fi writes: On 19.9.2011, at 11.27, Tom Clark wrote: Is there anyway of whitelisting an IP so that it can ignore mail_max_userip_connections=10? With v2.0 in theory: remote 1.2.3.4 { mail_max_userip_connections = 0 } I don't know if it actually works.