On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:02 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > > Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet,
> > > 1:4294967295 should work too.
> >
> > 1:4294967295 doesn't really fill me with joy either -- that assumes
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:32 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Or if you want flags for messages you haven't even seen yet,
> > 1:4294967295 should work too.
>
> 1:4294967295 doesn't really fill me with joy either -- that assumes that
> a UID is limited to 32 bits unsigned...
It is, as defined b
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 18:04 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the
> > 1:* in it
>
> I changed it in v2.0.
>
> > -- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating to
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> And thanks for not (yet) making it reject the invalid command with the
> 1:* in it
I changed it in v2.0.
> -- I'll need to come up with a strategy for migrating to the
> 'correct' command on the client side, given that older versions o
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:40 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Whops. Looks like I read the RFC a bit wrong. Fixed in v2.0 and v1.2
> hg now. I guess I should release 1.2.14 then. Could you try that the
> fix works properly? At least it doesn't give any errors anymore.
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 16:15 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> A00131 SELECT lists.bluez (QRESYNC (1154090296 1861
> (1,120,1578,2064,2226,2280,2298 1,120,12037,12523,12685,12739,12757)))
>
> Dovecot doesn't like that though:
>
> A00131 BAD Error in IMAP command SELECT: Invalid QRESYNC parameters
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:37 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file
> > mail-index-transaction.c:
> > line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
> > (seq >= t->first_n
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:37:16 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c:
>> line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
>> (seq >= t->first_new_seq
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 18:37 +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/70fa6178380e
Thanks. Obviously you've been able to test on exactly the same mailbox
I'm using, so you'll not be surprised to hear that the patch works fine
here too.
Do shout if you see
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:27 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c:
> line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
> (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
>
> A00131 SELECT lists.bluez (QRE
Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c:
line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
(seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
* PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT
SORT=DISPLAY THREA
11 matches
Mail list logo