Re: [Doxygen-users] doxygen recent versioning

Hi, I would add a related question: does doxygen follow the SemVer rules? Thank you, Liviu ___ Doxygen-users mailing list Doxygen-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/doxygen-users

Re: [Doxygen-users] Controllable URLs for static pages?

> On 1 Jun 2023, at 21:55, Dimitri van Heesch wrote: > > Hi Luviu, > > A similar issue has been reported and fixed, see > https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/issues/10089 > > If you think your issue is different, please file a new issue and include a > self-contained example. Frankly I'm no

[Doxygen-users] Controllable URLs for static pages?

Hi, Is there any trick to control the URLs of static pages? In my case I have a Getting Started file named `install.md`, which gets `md_website_2pages_2install.html`, not exactly intuitive, not to mention that it changed from 1.9.6 to 1.9.7. The reason I stumbled upon it is that in my home pag

[Doxygen-users] Customised look

-os-plus.github.io). The doxygen related files are publicly available from: https://github.com/micro-os-plus/cmsis-plus/tree/xpack/doxygen Best Regards, Liviu Ionescu http://gnuarmeclipse.github.io http://micro-os-plus.github.io

Re: [Doxygen-users] Explicit cross reference section name

On Feb 6, 2013, at 20:51, wrote: > I am not sure I understand what you mean. Does \sa (see also) do what you > want? I did not use \sa, but my understanding is that it adds a new section, with other explicitly given links. The issue I have is with default cross reverences, more specifically w

[Doxygen-users] Explicit cross reference section name

As a long time fan of cross references, I enabled them on my docs, and I'm quite happy with content. However, I have some suggestions regarding the presentation. I would be happy to see an explicit section name equivalent to \par Cross references just before the cross section lines. In some of

[Doxygen-users] Explicit 'Detailed Description' section name

I recently enabled the ALWAYS_DETAILED_SEC and I like the result, which made me think on how things can be further improved. I would be very happy to see the \detailed section also explicitly marked on all other elements (members, attributes, etc), using the same style as for \param or \return,

[Doxygen-users] Improved html structure for cross reference lines

I tried to change something in the look of the cross reference lines and when I checked the html code used to display the 'Definition at line' and 'References by' I noticed these are anonymous paragraphs. I suggest to add some css class names to them, or even better, change them to sections.