2014-10-26 22:53 GMT+01:00 Zieris, Franz :
> This is only a partial answer; there are two sentences that look odd to
> me.
>
>
>
> > This affects only the JRE launching the IDE.
>
> I’m not sure I get that point: It sounds like a mitigation – but the
> IDE-launching JRE is all that matters for t
I do not find any OpenJFX binaries. There is only an instruction on how
to compile them.
Just looking at the *normal* Windows "overload" (Cygwin etc ... instead
of Visual Studio) that is needed to compile the sources ... well native
code = dll / so files.
Have fun to distribute that properly
This is only a partial answer; there are two sentences that look odd to me.
> This affects only the JRE launching the IDE.
I’m not sure I get that point: It sounds like a mitigation – but the
IDE-launching JRE is all that matters for the argument in favor of Java 6.
We want developers who are bo
