[DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread John W. Bairen, Jr.
ok, here's a strange one... on Friday at work on a win2k, i.e. 6 machine, i closed 2.5.8 beta 8 and logged off/on then i installed and opened 2.5.8 beta 9 i had no problems.dqsd ran fine. todaywhen i turned my pc on the text areafor the toolbar was the samegray color as my taskbar and i

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Will Dean
At 10:42 10/06/2002 -0500, you wrote: I see the same problem. I didn't see it after a logoff/logon, only after I had rebooted. I'm not seeing this, but it is the behaviour you get if the window.close() I put in version.js fires. Normally there's a message box displayed first as a warning

RE: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Sarah Sweeney
I am having what I *think* is the same problem. I couldn't get the calendar to open (I got an error message "Line: 121; Char: 5; Error: Class not registered; Code: 0; URL: file://C:\Program Files\Quick Search Deskbar\search.htm"), so I tried running "regsvr32 "C:\Program Files\Quick Search

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread John W. Bairen, Jr.
it worked originally for me. but again when i shutdown/rebooted i had the same problem. - Original Message - From: Sarah Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:00 PM Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9 That worked for me. Sarah

RE: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Sarah Sweeney
Oops. Same here. Once I rebooted again, I had to close and open the toolbar (a couple of times actually) to get it to work. On the bright side, at least it's not totally broken. BTW, I am also on a Win2K, IE6 machine. Sarah -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Will Dean
At 13:00 10/06/2002 -0300, you wrote: That worked for me. Weired. What version of IE/OS are you using? Are you being given warnings about bad versions? What happens if you do a 'refresh' on DQSD, or enter a ! to restart it? Do you get a warning then? Is the DQSDTools.dll on a 'funny'

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Will Dean
At 12:59 10/06/2002 -0400, you wrote: i had to regsvr32 -u dqsdt258.dll not dqsdtools258.dll Yes sorry, I couldn't remember what it gets called. it acutally seemed to work for one reboot... but a second reboot did not make it. Are you saying it worked _after_ you'd done regsvr32 -u

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread John W. Bairen, Jr.
Are you saying it worked _after_ you'd done regsvr32 -u dqsdt258.dll? aah, i did the unregister of the 258 dll and then ran the beta 9 install. then i rebooted and it worked through one reboot. hoping that would be the solution, i decided to try through a second reboot to be sure, but no luck.

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Will Dean
At 13:06 10/06/2002 -0400, you wrote: should we consider pulling beta 9 for a bit? I don't think so - there's no point in beta-ing it if you don't use the feedback to find the bugs. b8 is available for download if people can't use b9. Will

Re: [DQSD-Users] 2.5.8 beta 9

2002-06-10 Thread Glenn Carr
should we consider pulling beta 9 for a bit? I don't think so - there's no point in beta-ing it if you don't use the feedback to find the bugs. b8 is available for download if people can't use b9. Agreed. I've got some more clues... The VersionIsCorrect method appears to be not handling