to:david.bl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 9:00 AM
> To: DQSD users mailing list
> Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Ubiquity...
>
> It's one of the most important applications on my computer.
> My favorite feature is still the ":" suffix for the mwd
> se
It's one of the most important applications on my computer. My favorite
feature is still the ":" suffix for the mwd search, because I'm constantly
checking definitions and usage. Here's a post from two years ago:
http://dblume.livejournal.com/65402.html If we checked my history usage
you'd proba
> Well, personnaly I still couldn't live without dqsd and use it on a
> minutely basis. :)
>
> The low volume maybe means it's a mature product now.
I agree, on both counts.
I think it would be cool to have it as a Sidebar gadget, but otherwise I'm
quite happy with it as-is.
--
I meant to include this link...
http://lifehacker.com/5145709/make-ubiquity-your-ultimate-firefox-commander
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:21:06 +
From: tom.corco...@moonbade.com
Subject: [DQSD-Users] Ubiquity...
Is the mailing list traffic (handfuls of threads in the last 9 months)
as indicator o
Hi Tom,
I dunno, I still use it a lot, but I notice that I haven't had much
time to develop it further lately...
But I notice I often wish it worked differently, not docked to the
taskbar, for example. Maybe new users have found the competitors more
fulfilling.
- Kim
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:
Well, personnaly I still couldn't live without dqsd and use it on a
minutely basis. :)
The low volume maybe means it's a mature product now.
MLL
tom.corco...@moonbade.com wrote:
> Is the mailing list traffic (handfuls of threads in the last 9 months)
> as indicator of dqsd's waning popularity
