Fw: [drakelist] Test (2)

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- From: Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:15 AM Subject: Re: [drakelist] Test (2) Thanks Richard. I

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Thanks Max, that's what I saw too. How does the reflector look stateside? (Someone?) (Anyone?) Thanks again, Terry G3VFO - Original Message -

RE: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread John A. Stringer
John A. Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Also no longer receiving posts! John. GI3KDR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of AirRadio Sent:

[drakelist] Re: Drake Reflector in US

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Thanks Larry. That appears to be the case, as I now have reports that others in the UK are not receiving posts, either. The reflector appears to be

RE: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread John A. Stringer
John A. Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- But I have just received my own post!! John. GI3KDR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John A.

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Yessame hereand that is what I find REALLY odd! I seem to receive from the reflector my own and other UK-originated posts, but none (yet) from

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Don Cunningham
Don Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Very quiet here too the last couple of days, Terry. Good weather taking all the Drakesters outside, I guess, hi. 73, Don, WB5HAK

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:23:18PM +0100, Terry Hart wrote: Yessame hereand that is what I find REALLY odd! I seem to receive from

RE: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread John A. Stringer
John A. Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Received yours fine Geoff. John GI3KDR -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Geoffrey S. Mendelson

[drakelist] Hamvention and Drake Forum

2008-04-29 Thread k9sqg
We?cordially invite all Drake enthusiasts to the Dayton Hamvention and the Drake Forum.? The Forum has changed the day, time, and location, from previous years.? This year the Forum will be on Friday, May 16, 230-345, Room 2. For the first 150 to arrive, they will be given a free ticket for our

Re: [drakelist] Hamvention and Drake Forum

2008-04-29 Thread k9sqg
As a side note, unless you've participated in a Hamvention as a volunteer, it is hard to comprehend the amount of effort that goes into preparing for?and conducting such an event.? So when you see a Hamvention volunteer, I encourage you to just say thanks.? Too, if we combine our efforts, we

Re: [drakelist] Hamvention and Drake Forum

2008-04-29 Thread Duane Calvin
What time will the forum be? 73, Duane AC5AA At 07:33 AM 4/29/2008, you wrote: We cordially invite all Drake enthusiasts to the Dayton Hamvention and the Drake Forum. The Forum has changed the day, time, and location, from previous years. This year the Forum will be on Friday,

Re: [drakelist] Hamvention and Drake Forum

2008-04-29 Thread k9sqg
Duane, The Drake Forum will be Friday, May 16, starting at 230 and ending at 345. 73, Evan -Original Message- From: Duane Calvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 9:47 am Subject: Re: [drakelist] Hamvention and Drake Forum What time will the

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Received OK, Geoff. Hopefully things are working again, but there seems to have been a period where US posts were being seen over at your end but not

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Terry Hart
Terry Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Enjoy while it lasts! 73, Terry G3VFO - Original Message - From: Don Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29,

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread k9sqg
Please be aware that AOL deletes incoming and outgoing email periodically without any error messages to either the sender or receiver.? This contributes to missing posts from reflectors, general email, etc.? In addition, some email gets delayed for days or weeks and then magically appears.? Not

Re: [drakelist] TR-4 TX Hang-Up

2008-04-29 Thread Garey Barrell
Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Byron - OK. Relays take more coil current to pull in than they do to hold in. It takes a certain amount of current through the coil (pull) to drag

Re: [drakelist] TR-4 TX Hang-Up

2008-04-29 Thread Gypsymt34
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Byron WA5THJ. My TR4 with the original (fixed) relay would not pull in originally. After cleaning the relay points it wouldn't release as you describe. After putting the VOX VOX delay pots mid range and on the third cleaning it did work ...sometimes. If

Re: [drakelist] TR-4 TX Hang-Up

2008-04-29 Thread wb4hfn
I saw once where the relay iron core was expanding do to the heat the coil generated around it, which to this point is normal. But in this case as the core expanded it shorted against a bare coil winding. The core itself being at ground potential, when shorted against the coil winding

Re: [drakelist] TR-4 TX Hang-Up

2008-04-29 Thread Garey Barrell
Garey Barrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Ron - That's a NEW one! :-) How long did the relay have to be energized to generate enough heat? Garey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I saw once

RE: [drakelist] TR-4 TX Hang-Up

2008-04-29 Thread Ron Baker
Ron Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Garey,about 30 to 45 seconds is all the time it took. Ron -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread Ron Wagner
Ron Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Be aware that almost all ISPs now delete potential spam e-mail. The stats are that close to 80% of the e-mail traffic that is on the net is spam.

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread K9SQG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- I hear you Ron. Personally, I would rather get spam so that I don't miss any incoming messages. Too, AOL (almost online) deletes the outgoing as well as incoming

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread John_Hudson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Bottom Line, Get a REAL Internet provider and experience less SPAM, manage your e-mail without loosing information, and have less headaches. I receive EVERY message

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread neil
neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang --

Re: [drakelist] Test

2008-04-29 Thread John_Hudson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] made an utterance to the drakelist gang -- Understand Neil, I use Cox Internet for my personal e-mail and receive less SPAM on Cox than I do at work. I know you're right, we get less I have 32 Million Dollars