On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:32:24 -0500, Gary Poland wrote:
> Got have that mic preamp for more " swing ". Nothing like saturating a 16
> pill solid state amp and having a little negative modulation to be loud and
> proud !!! HI HI.
Strong, the power of the dark side is
--
Ham Radio NU0C
L
I have a fair number of D104 microphones. Most have the preamp, but for
my older tube state rigs, I have two without the amp. I have a very
deep bass voice, and the amplified D104 mics do a great job so long as I
follow Garey's advice and keep the gain in the microphone down to a
pretty low l
Garey,
Got have that mic preamp for more " swing ". Nothing like saturating a 16
pill solid state amp and having a little negative modulation to be loud and
proud !!! HI HI.
73, Gary___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zer
Richard Knoppow wrote:
Jim's on the right track. I'd check the Carrier Oscillator as
described in the manual in Section VIII, Para. B, 1-4. It should
require very little adjustment, unless someone has been "fixing" it!
Then go back to Section IV, Para. C to rebalance the Carrier Oscillat
Check the opposite sideband. If its not the carrier oscillator it could be a
bad sideband filter ... it happens.
73, Gary W8PU
http://home.roadrunner.com/~w8pu
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/list
Curt -
Jim's on the right track. I'd check the Carrier Oscillator as described
in the manual in Section VIII, Para. B, 1-4. It should require very
little adjustment, unless someone has been "fixing" it! Then go back to
Section IV, Para. C to rebalance the Carrier Oscillator.
The amplified
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:32:56 +0200, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> From what I understand (Garey help!!) the impedance of the D-104 is a
>good match to the impedance of any of the Drake tube gear and no
>amplifer is needed. The amplifer was designed as an impedance matching
>device, not a gain
Geoffry is correct. Your Drake needs a high impedance mic to get "that
Drake sound".
Hulett, Russell wrote:
Trying out my T-4X on SSB, using an old D-104 microphone with T-UG8 stand. Comments were
audio was ok but sounded like I was "in a tunnel". Another mentioned that the
audio was higher
On Feb 28, 2010, at 10:13 PM, Hulett, Russell wrote:
Trying out my T-4X on SSB, using an old D-104 microphone with T-UG8
stand. Comments were audio was ok but sounded like I was "in a
tunnel". Another mentioned that the audio was higher pitched than
my other rigs. My T-4XB never received
Trying out my T-4X on SSB, using an old D-104 microphone with T-UG8 stand.
Comments were audio was ok but sounded like I was "in a tunnel". Another
mentioned that the audio was higher pitched than my other rigs. My T-4XB never
received any similar reports, though the microphone used with that
10 matches
Mail list logo
