Pada 6 Mac 2012 7:13 PTG, Umarzuki Mochlis umarz...@gmail.com menulis:
Pada 6 Mac 2012 6:57 PTG, Kaloyan Kovachev kkovac...@varna.net menulis:
addendum:
what i want to do is storage failover since email service's clustering
is handled by zimbra-cluster and rgmaner + cman on centos
the
Hi,
now you've cleared things up for me, thanks.
On 03/06/2012 04:27 AM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
without drbd, A3 would automatically mount A1's LUN run as
A1 while resuming A1's role via rgmanager
Without DRBD? How does this work? Are those LUNs on a SAN?
With DRBD, you would need to set
Pada 6 Mac 2012 4:45 PTG, Felix Frank f...@mpexnet.de menulis:
On 03/06/2012 04:27 AM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
without drbd, A3 would automatically mount A1's LUN run as
A1 while resuming A1's role via rgmanager
Without DRBD? How does this work? Are those LUNs on a SAN?
With DRBD, you
On 03/06/2012 11:18 AM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
yes, the mailbox storages are LUN's on a SAN. it manages to do
clustering with rgmanager + cman, so A3 would take where A1 or A2 left
off by mounting A1's or A2's mailbox storage on itself since it is
already running a standby mailbox service
Hi,
On 03/06/2012 11:34 AM, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
Yes. You may use floating IP for DRBD and have one instance (IP) in site A
and another in site B for each service.
Do not use the service IP as floating IP as you will have problems moving
the service from A to B.
If A1 is active, you
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:40:22 +0100, Felix Frank f...@mpexnet.de wrote:
Hi,
On 03/06/2012 11:34 AM, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
Yes. You may use floating IP for DRBD and have one instance (IP) in
site
A
and another in site B for each service.
Do not use the service IP as floating IP as you will
Pada 6 Mac 2012 6:57 PTG, Kaloyan Kovachev kkovac...@varna.net menulis:
Keep in mind that this is shared storage we're talking about here, no
local disks in either A1 *or* B1. I believe DRBD could be made to
operate thus, but there might be performance issues.
Again Yes. Performance will be
Hi,
sorry I forget to CC the list (again), so let me bring this back to
everyone's vision.
On 03/05/2012 11:01 AM, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
Pada 5 Mac 2012 5:21 PTG, Felix Frank f...@mpexnet.de menulis:
Hi,
this is unfortunately not very clear at all.
So A1 and A2 are failover partners
Pada 5 Mac 2012 7:44 PTG, Felix Frank f...@mpexnet.de menulis:
but what i did not understand/know, would i be able to make A3 mount
disk/LUN of A1 or A2 so A3 can resume A1's or A2's zimbra-cluster
service? without drbd, A3 would automatically mount A1's LUN run as
A1 while resuming A1's
